Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in the Balance between Membrane-Bound and Soluble Forms of CD95 (Fas) during Selection of Tumor Cells in vivo

  • Published:
Biochemistry (Moscow) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies concerning the expression of the receptor CD95 (Fas) by tumor cells and the role of this protein in apoptosis induced by the effector host cells that bear Fas-ligand are mainly focused on the membrane-bound form of Fas. There are only a few data about the production of the soluble form of Fas by the tumor cells, its role in the interaction with the effector host cells, and the possible changes in the synthesis of this protein during tumor progression. In the present work, three in vivo transformed parental cell lines of different origin and 24 of their variants isolated after a short cycle of natural selection in vivo were studied. It was demonstrated for the first time that: 1) production of the soluble Fas by all selected in vivo variant tumor cell lines increased significantly (2-10-fold) in comparison to the initial (parental) cell lines and did not depend on the origin of the parental lines. At the same time, the expression of the membrane bound form of Fas decreased considerably; 2) variations of the balance between membrane-bound and soluble forms of Fas in selected in vivo variant cells and the expression of the [H2O2 CA + PGES]-phenotype by these cells (this phenotype determines one of the essential mechanisms of the protection of a tumor cell in vivo) possibly represent independent secondary changes acquired during tumor progression in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Arase, H., Arase, N., and Saito, T. (1995) J. Exp. Med., 181, 1235–1238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nagata, S., and Golstein, P. (1995) Science, 267, 1449–1456.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cascino, I., Fiucci, G., Papoff, G., and Ruberti, G. (1995) J. Immunol., 154, 2706–2713.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cascino, I., Papoff, G., Eramo, A., and Ruberti, G. (1996) Front. Biosci., 1, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schumann, H., Morawietz, H., Hakim, K., Zerkowski, H. R., Eschenhagen, T., Holtz, J., and Darmer, D. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res., 239, 794–798.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hahne, M., Renno, T., Schroeter, M., Irmler, M., French, L., Bornard, T., McDonald, H. R., and Tschopp, J. (1996) Eur. J. Immunol., 26, 721–724.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rouvier, E., Luciani, M. F., and Golstein, P. (1993) J. Exp. Med., 177, 195–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Restifo, N. (2001) Nature Med., 7, 259.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schröter, M., Peli, J., Hahne, M., Tschopp, J., and Reichmann, E. (2000) Oncogene, 19, 1794–1800.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, J., Zhou, T., Liu, C., Shapiro, J. P., Brauer, M. J., Kiefer, M. C., Barr, P. J., and Mountz, J. D. (1994) Science, 263, 1759–1762.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O'Connell, J., O'sullivan, G. C., Collins, J. K., and Shanahan, F. (1996) J. Exp. Med., 184, 1075–1082.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deichman, G. I. (2000) Biochemistry (Moscow), 65, 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deichman, G. I., Matveeva, V. A., Kashkina, L. M., Dyakova, N. A., Uvarova, E. N., Nikiforov, M. A., and Gudkov, A. V. (1998) Int. J. Cancer, 75, 277–283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Deichman, G. I., Kashkina, L. M., Misenina, O. A., Gorojanskaya, E. G., Nikiforov, M. A., Gudkov, A. V., Dyakova, N. A., Komelkov, A. V., Prilutskaya, M. O., Kushlinsky, N. E., and Tatosyan, A. G. (1996) Int. J. Cancer, 66, 747–752.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abbasova, S. G., Kushlinsky, N. E., Murashev, A. N., Kostanian, I. A., Obysheva, M. N., Nikogosian, S. O., Britvin, T. A., Bagirova, N. F., Solovyev, Yu. N., Lipkin, V. M., and Trapeznikov, N. N. (1999) Byul. Eksp. Biol. Med., 127, 328–331.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Voller, A., Bidwell, D., and Bartlett, A. (1980) in Manual of Clinical Immunology (Rose, N. R., and Friedman, H., eds.) 2nd ed., American Society of Microbiology, Washington, D.C., pp. 359–371.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kluchareva, T. E., Matveeva, V. A., and Kuchlinsky, N. E. (1992) Immunol. Lett., 33, 239–246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, D. C., Hahne, M., Schroeter, M., Frei, K., Fontana, A., Villunger, A., Newton, K., Tschopp, J., and Strasser, A. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 14871–14876.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. I. Deichman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pirogov, A.V., Abbasova, S.G., Dyakova, N.A. et al. Changes in the Balance between Membrane-Bound and Soluble Forms of CD95 (Fas) during Selection of Tumor Cells in vivo. Biochemistry (Moscow) 67, 240–245 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014474316671

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014474316671

Navigation