Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of a Congruence Scale Based on the Satir Model

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Congruence Scale derives from the construct of congruence, the goal of therapeutic change in the Satir model. Congruence is conceptualized as a state of awareness, openness, and connection in three human dimensions: the Intrapsychic, Interpersonal, and Universal-Spiritual. Procedures in developing the Congruence Scale are described. Results provide evidence of concurrent validity with the Satisfaction With Life Scale and the Outcome Questionnaire. Four factors of the Congruence Scale are extracted from factor analysis: Intrapsychic-Interpersonal, Spiritual, Creative, and Communal. Further research to confirm the reliability and validity of the congruent construct is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alexander, J. F., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Jameson, P. B. (1994). The process and outcome ofmarital and family therapy: Research, review and evaluation. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of pychotherapy and bhavior change (pp. 595–630). New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banmen, A., & Banmen, J. (Eds.). (1991). Meditations of Virginia Satir. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becvar, D., & Becvar, R. (1996). Family therapy: A systemic integration. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., McLendon, J., Freeman, M., Hill, N., Loberg, J., Lester, T. & Huber, C. (1996). Satir and congruence: A response. In B. J. Brothers (Ed.), Couples and the Tao of congruence (pp. 143–148). New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, pp71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhl, B. (1989). Virginia Satir: In memoriam. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, I. & Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family therapy: An overview (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A. S., Kniskern, D. P., & Pinsof, W. M. (1986). Research on marital and family therapies. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 565–624). New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., & Burlingame, G. M. (1996). Outcome questionnaire. NJ: American Professional Credentialing Services LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., Okiishi, J. C., Finch, A. E., & Johnson, L.D. (1998). Outcome assessment: From conceptualization to implementation. Professional Psychology, 29, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. (2002). Congruence in Satir's model: Its spiritual and religious significance. Contemporary Family Therapy, 24(1), pp57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, H. A. (1991). Empirical values and the culture of family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 227–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeschen, S. (1998). Systematic training in the skills of Virginia Satir. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1998). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (1976). Bridging research, theory, and application: The triple threat in science. In D. Olson (Ed.), Treating relationships (pp. 565–579). Lake Mills, IA: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V. (1964). Conjoint family therapy. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V. (1986). A partial portrait of a family therapist in process. In C. Fishman & B. Rosman (Eds.), Evolving models for family change (pp. 278–293). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V. (1988). The new peoplemaking. Mountain View, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V., & Banmen, J. (1983). Virginia Satir verbatim. North Delta, B.C.: Delta Psychological Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V., Banmen, J., Gerber, J., & Gomori, M. (1991). The Satir model: Family therapy and beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D., Keeney, B., & Sutton, P. (1982). Theorists who influence clinical members of AAMFT: A research note. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8, 367–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D., & Moon, S. (Eds.). (1996). Research methods in family therapy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umphress, V. J., Lambert, M. J., Smart, D. W., Barlow, S. H., & Clouse, G. (1997). Concurrent and construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 15, 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 145 Jean-Jacques Lussier St., P.O. Box 450, Stn. A, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada

    Bonnie K. Lee

Authors
  1. Bonnie K. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, B.K. Development of a Congruence Scale Based on the Satir Model. Contemporary Family Therapy 24, 217–239 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014390009534

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014390009534

Search

Navigation