Skip to main content
Log in

The Expression of Mutation sy2 Causing Nonhomologous Synapsis in Meiosis of Diploid Rye Secale cereale L.

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cytological expression of spontaneous mutation sy2 isolated from a population of weedy rye was examined. It was demonstrated that the primary defect of meiosis in the mutant plants is nonhomologous synapsis, which occurs simultaneously with the homologous one. An electron microscope study of the synaptonemal complex (SC) at prophase I showed synaptic abnormalities that were manifested as “switches” of synapting axial elements to the nonhomologous partner and the formation of foldbacks of lateral SC elements. The sy2 mutants are characterized by one to two such events per meiocyte. Nonhomologous synapsis leads to the appearance of univalents at metaphase I (on average 4.16 ± 0.002 per meiocyte) and multivalents (on average 0.12 ± 0.007 per meiocyte). The presence of multivalents in 12% of meiocytes at metaphase I may result from recombination in ectopic regions of homology. It is suggested that the sy2 mutation impairs a component of the system that limits synapsis in meiocytes to only homologous chromosome pairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Roeder, G.S., Meiotic Chromosomes: It Takes Two to Tango, Genes Dev., 1997, vol. 11, pp. 2600-2621.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walker, M.Y. and Hawley, R.S., Hanging on to Your Homolog: The Roles of Pairing, Synapsis and Recombination in Maintenance of Homolog Adhesion, Chromosoma, 2000, vol. 109, pp. 3-9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van Heemst, D. and Heyting, C., Sister Chromatid Cohesion and Recombination in Meiosis, Chromosoma, 2000, vol. 109, pp. 10-26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Santos, J.L., The Relationship between Synapsis and Recombination: Two Different Views, Heredity, 1998, vol. 82, pp. 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hawley, R.S. and Arbel, T., Yeast Genetics and the Fall of the Classical View of Meiosis, Cell (Cambridge, Mass.), 1993, vol. 72, pp. 301-303.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golubovskaya, I.N., The Genetic Control of Meiosis, Int. Rev. Cytol., 1979, vol. 58, pp. 247-290.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Backer, B.S., Carpenter, A.T.C., Esposito, M.S., et al., The Genetical Control of Meiosis, Annu. Rev. Genet., 1976, vol. 10, pp. 53-134.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gottschalk, W. and Kaul, M.L.H., Asynapsis and Desynapsis in Flowering Plants: II. Desynapsis, Nucleus, 1980, vol. 23, nos. 1–2, pp. 97-120

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koduru, P.R.K. and Rao, M.K., Cytogenetics of Synaptic Mutants in Higher Plant Meiosis, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1985, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 449-466.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sosnikhina, S.P., Fedotova, Yu.S., Smirnov, V.G., et al., Study of the Genetic Control of Meiosis in Rye, Genetika (Moscow), 1994, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1043-1056.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fedotova, Yu.S., Kolomiets, O.L., and Bogdanov, Yu.F., Electron Microscopic Analysis of Meiosis Prophase in Rye Mutants with Disturbed Chromosome Synapsis, Genetika (Moscow), 1989, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 462-468.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sosnikhina, S.P., Smirnov, V.G., Mikhailova, E.I., and Egorova, L.F., Disturbance of Homologous Synapsis in Meiotic Mutants of Diploid Rye, Genetika (Moscow), 1994, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 488-499.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fedotova, Yu.S., Bogdanov, Yu.F., Gadzhieva, S.A., et al., Meiotic Mutants of Rye Secale cereale L.: II. Non-Homologous Synapsis in Desynaptic Mutants sy7 and sy10, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1994, vol. 88, pp. 1029-1036.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jenkins, G. and Okumus, A., Indiscriminate Synapsis in Achiasmate Allium fistulosum L. (Liliaceae), J. Cell. Sci., 1992, vol. 103, pp. 415-422.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Timofeeva, L.P. and Golubovskaya, I.N., A New Desynaptic Gene Type Revealed in Maize by Microdissection of Synaptonemal Complexes, Tsitologiya, 1991, vol. 33, pp. 3-8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Golubovskaya, I.N., Grebennikova, Z.K., Auger, D.L., and Sheridan, W.F., The Maize desynaptic 1 Mutation Disrupts Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis, Dev. Genet., 1997, vol. 21, pp. 146-159.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baker, S.M., Bronner, C.E., Zhang, L., et al., Male Mice Defective in the DNA Mismatch Repair Gene PMS2 Exhibit Abnormal Chromosome Synapsis in Meiosis, Cell (Cambridge, Mass.), 1995, vol. 82, pp. 309-319.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sosnikhina, S.P., Kirillova, G.A., Mikhailova, E.I., et al., Genetic Control of Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis in Rye Secale cereale L.: The sy19 Gene Causing Heterologous Synapsis, Genetika (Moscow), 2001, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 81-90.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nairz, T.Q. and Klein, F., mre11S, a Yeast Mutation That Blocks Double-Strand-Break Processing and Permits Nonhomologous Synapsis in Meiosis, Genes Dev., 1997, vol. 11, pp. 2272-2290.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jun-Yi Leu, Chua, P.R., and Roeder, G.S., The Meiosis-Specific Hop2 Protein of S. cerevisiae Ensures Synapsis between Homologous Chromosomes, Cell (Cambridge, Mass.), 1998, vol. 94, pp. 375-386.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gerecke, E.E. and Zolan, M.E., An mre11 Mutant of Corpinus cinereus Has Defects in Meiotic Chromosome Pairing, Condensation and Synapsis, Genetics, 2000, vol. 154, pp. 1125-1139.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gobbe, M. and Heck, M.M.S., Review: SMCs in the World of Chromosome Biology—From Prokaryotes to Eukaryotes, J. Struct. Biol., 2000, vol. 129, pp. 123-143.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maguire, M.P., Paredes, A.M., and Riess, R.W., The Desynaptic Mutants of Maize as a Combined Defect of Synaptonemal Complex and Chiasmata Maintenance, Genome, 1991, vol. 34, pp. 879-887.

    Google Scholar 

  24. De Jong, J.H., Havekes, F., Roca, A., and Naranjo, T., Synapsis and Chiasmata Formation in Ditelo-Substitute Haploid of Rye, Genome, 1991, vol. 34, pp. 109-120.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moses, M.J., Poorman, P.A., Roderick, T.H., and Davis-son, M.T., Synaptonemal Complex Analysis of Mouse Chromosomal Rearrangements: IV. Synapsis and Synaptic Adjustment in Two Paracentric Inversions, Chromosoma, 1982, vol. 84, pp. 457-477.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fedotova, Yu.S., Kolomiets, O.L., and Gadzhieva, S.A., Electron Microscopic Analysis of Total Preparations of the Synaptonemal Complexes of Rye Heterozygous for a Paracentric Inversion, Tsitologiya, 1991, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 3-12.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson, L.K., Stack, S.M., and Sherman, I.M., Spreading Synaptonemal Complexes from Zea mays: I. No Synaptic Adjustment of Inversion Loops during Pachytene, Chromosoma, 1988, vol. 96, pp. 295-305.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jenkins, G., Chromosome Pairing in Triticum aestivum c.v. Chinese Spring, Carlsberg Res. Commun., 1992, vol. 53, pp. 191-208.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sosnikhina, S.P., Kirillova, G.A., Tikholiz, O.A. et al. The Expression of Mutation sy2 Causing Nonhomologous Synapsis in Meiosis of Diploid Rye Secale cereale L.. Russian Journal of Genetics 38, 156–164 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014382027071

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014382027071

Keywords

Navigation