Skip to main content
Log in

CEO Tenure, Board Composition, and Regulation

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the effect of deregulation in the 1970s and 1980s on the size of the board of directors, its composition, and on CEO tenure. Using panel data techniques, we consider those effects in the aggregate and for individual industries while controlling for firm size, CEO age, time and firm-specific effects. We conclude that deregulation significantly reduced the number of outsiders and the number of directors, but had little effect on the proportion of outsiders. We then examine the effect of deregulation on CEO tenure using hazard analysis. We find that deregulation increased the hazard rate, or reduced the tenure of CEOs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A. A., and R. A. Kessel. 1962. “Competition, Monopoly, and the Pursuit of Money.” In Aspects of Labor Economics, edited by H. Gregg Lewis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., and C. R. Knoeber. 2001. “Do Some Directors Play a Political Role?” Journal of Law and Economics 44(1): 179-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., and B. Black. 1999. “The Uncertain Relationship between Board Composition and Firm Performance.” Business Lawyer 54: 921-963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., and B. Black. 1998. “Board Independence and Long-term Firm Performance.” Stanford Law School John M. Olin Working Paper No. 188.

  • Brinckley, J. A., J. S. Linck, and J. L. Coles. 1999. “What Happens to CEOs After They Retire? New Evidence on Career Concerns, Horizon Problems, and CEO Incentives.” Journal of Financial Economics 52(3): 341-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, T. M., and D. H. Ciscel. 1982. “The Effects of Regulation on Executive Compensation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 64: 505-509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R., and D. Oakes. 1984. Analysis of Survival Data. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Alessi, L. 1974. “Managerial Tenure under Private and Government Ownership in the Electric Power Industry.” Journal of Political Economy 82: 645-653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, T., S. Sundgren, and M. T. Wells. 1998. “Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics 48: 35-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemington, T. R., and D. P. Harrington. 1991. Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, R. 1997. “Ownership, Regulation, and Managerial Monitoring in the Electric Utility Industry.” Journal of Law and Economics 40: 261-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, R., and H. D. Vinod. 1997. “CEO Age and Outside Directors: A Hazard Analysis.” Review of Industrial Organization 12: 767-780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertner, R., and S. N. Kaplan. 1996. “The Value-Maximizing Board.” University of Chicago Graduate School of Business and NBER working paper.

  • Hermalin, B. E., and M. S. Weisbach. 1998. “Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO.” American Economic Review 88(1): 96-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B. E., and M. S. Weisbach. 1991. “The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance.” Financial Management 20: 101-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B. E., and M. S. Weisbach. 1988. “The Determinants of Board Composition.” RAND Journal of Economics 19(4): 589-606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. 1993. “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control systems.” Journal of Finance 48: 831-880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. L., N. L. Rose, and A. Shepard. 1993. “Regulatory Constraints on CEO Compensation.” Brookings Papers on Economics Activity 1-58.

  • Joskow, P. L., N. L. Rose, and C. T. Wolfram. 1996. “Political Constraints on Executive Compensation: Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics 27: 165-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, N. M. 1988. “Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions.” Journal of Economic Literature 26: 646-679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kini, O., W. Kracaw, and S. Main. 1995. “Corporate Takeovers, Firm Performance, And Board Composition.” Journal of Corporate Finance 1: 383-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. 1998. “Affiliated Directors: Puppets of Management or Efficient Directors?” New York University, Stern School of Business working paper.

  • Kole, S. R., and K. M. Lehn. 1999. “Deregulation and the Adaptation of Governance Structure: The Case of the U.S. Airline Industry.” Journal of Financial Economics 52: 79-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L. 1996. “The Effectiveness of Outside Directors as a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Theories and Evidence.” Northwestern University Law Review 90: 898-976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M., and J. W. Lorsch. 1992. “A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance.” Business Lawyer 48(1): 59-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAvoy, P. W., S. Cantor, J. Dana, and S. Peck. 1983. “ALI Proposals for Increased Control of the Corporation by the Board of Directors: An Economic Analysis.” In: Statement of the Business Roundtable on the American Law Institute's Proposed Principles of Corporate Governance and Structure: Restatement and Recommendations. New York: Business Roundtable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrino, R. 1997. “CEO Turnover and Outside Succession: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics 46(2): 165-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1996. “A Survey of Corporate Governance.” Harvard University: NBER Working Paper No. 5554.

  • Weisbach, M. S. 1988. “Outside Directors and CEO Turnover.” Journal of Financial Economics 29: 431-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1964. The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objective in a Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, C. 1993. “Economic Deregulation: Days Of Reckoning for Microeconomists.” Journal of Economic Literature 31: 1263-1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D. 1996. “Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors.” Journal of Financial Economics 40: 185-211.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geddes, R., Vinod, H.D. CEO Tenure, Board Composition, and Regulation. Journal of Regulatory Economics 21, 217–235 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014343908183

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014343908183

Keywords

Navigation