Social Justice Research

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 327–342 | Cite as

The Effects of Belief in a Just World and Victim's Innocence on Secondary Victimization, Judgements of Justice and Deservingness

Article

Abstract

Several studies have shown that victims judged to be innocent are more liked and helped by observers than victims judged to be noninnocent. Nevertheless, objectively innocent victims are very often secondarily victimized (blamed, devalued, avoided, or have their suffering minimized), and judged as deserving or as being in a just situation. An impressive amount of literature shows that high believers in a just world victimize the victims more than low believers, judge them as more deserving and think they are in a fairer situation. But the evaluation of the joint impact of the innocence of the victim and of the observers' BJW (belief in a just world) on the observers' reactions to the victim has been left undone. This study aims to throw some light on this subject. An experimental study was conducted using a 2 BJW (high; low) by 2 victim's innocence (innocent; noninnocent) between-subjects design. No interaction effects were found, but the forms of secondary victimization, as well as the judgements of justice and deservingness, were more positively correlated in the condition where the threat to BJW is higher.

belief in a just world victimization justice victim's innocence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Brickman, P., Rabinowitz, V. C., Karuza, J., Coates, D., Cohen, E., and Kidder, L. (1982). Models of helping and coping. Am. Psych. 37: 368-384.Google Scholar
  2. Cadwell, S. (1991). Twice removed: The stigma suffered by gay men with AIDS. Smith College Stud. Soc. Work 61: 236-246. (Special Issue: Men and men's issues in social work theory and practice.)Google Scholar
  3. Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., and Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74: 1516-1530.Google Scholar
  4. Clyman, R. I., Roth, R. S., S niderman, S. H., and Charrier, J. (1980). Does a belief in a “just world” affect health care provides reactions to perinatal illness? J. Med. Educ. 55: 538-539.Google Scholar
  5. Comby, L., Devos, T., and Deschamps, J. C. (1995). Croyance en un monde juste: Responsabilit's comportamentale et morale attribu'es aux personnes s' ropositives. Rev. Int. Psychol. Soc. 2: 83-106.Google Scholar
  6. Connors, J., and Heaven, P. C. L. (1990). Authoritarianism and just world beliefs. J. Soc. Psychol. 127: 345-346.Google Scholar
  7. Correia, I., Brito, R., and Vala, J. (2001). Normes anti-racistes et persistance du racisme flagrant: Analyse comparative des attitudes face aux Tziganes et face aux Noirs au Portugal, Working Paper, CIS.Google Scholar
  8. Crandall, C. S., and Martinez, R. (1996). Culture, ideology and anti-fat attitudes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22: 1165-1176.Google Scholar
  9. Dalbert, C., Montada, L., and Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier skalen. Psychologische Beitrage 29: 596-615.Google Scholar
  10. Drout, C. E., and Gaertner, S. L. (1994). Gender differences in reactions to female victims. Soc. Behav. Pers. 22: 267-277.Google Scholar
  11. Furnham, A., and Procter, E. (1992). Sphere-specific just world beliefs and attitudes to AIDS. Hum. Rel. 45: 265-280.Google Scholar
  12. Glennon, F., Joseph, S., and Hunter, J.A. (1993). Justworld beliefs in unjust societies: Northern Ireland. J. Soc. Psychol. 133: 591-592.Google Scholar
  13. Gros, D., and De Puy, J. (1993). Pieg's par le virus: Sida et discriminations dans la vie quotidienne, Editions Staepfli+Cie SA, Berne.Google Scholar
  14. Hafer, C. (2000a). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified stroop task. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79: 165-173.Google Scholar
  15. Hafer, C. (2000b). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26: 1059-1073.Google Scholar
  16. Herbert, T. B., and Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1992). Negative reactions to victims: An overviewof responses and their determinants. In Montada, L., Fillip, S. H., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Life Crises and Experiences of Loss in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 497-518.Google Scholar
  17. Herek, G. M., and Glunt, E. K. (1993). Public attitudes toward AIDS-related issues in the United States. In Pryor, J. B., and Reeder, G. D. (eds.), The Social Psychology of HIV Infection, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 229-261.Google Scholar
  18. Johnston, M., Wright, S., and Weinman, J. (1995). Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio, NFER-Nelson, Berkshire.Google Scholar
  19. Karuza, J., and Carey, T. O. (1984). Relative preference and adaptiveness of behavioral blame for observers of rape victims. J. Pers. 52: 249-260.Google Scholar
  20. Kerr, N. L., and Kurtz, S. T. (1977). Effects of a victim's suffering and respectability on mock jury judgements: Further evidence on the justworld theory. Representative Res. Soc. Psychol. 8: 42-56.Google Scholar
  21. Kieselbach, T. (1997). Unemployment, victimization, and perceived injustices: Future perspectives for coping with occupational transitions. Soc. Just. Res. 10: 127-151.Google Scholar
  22. Kleinke, C. L., and Meyer, C. (1990). Evaluation of rape victim by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. Psychol. Women Q. 14: 343-353.Google Scholar
  23. Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1: 355-360.Google Scholar
  24. Lerner, M. J. (1980). Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Lerner, M. J. (1998). The two forms of belief in a just world: Some thoughts on why and how people care about justice. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimization and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Lerner, M. J., and Montada, L. (1998). An overview: Advances in belief in a just world theory and methods. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimization and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Lerner, M. J., and Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 4: 203-210.Google Scholar
  28. MacLean, M. J., and Chown, S. M. (1988). Just world beliefs and attitudes toward helping elderly people: A comparison of British and Canadian university students. International J. Aging Hum. Dev. 26: 249-260.Google Scholar
  29. Maes, J. (1994). Blaming the victim: Belief in control or belief in justice? Soc. Just. Res. 7: 69-90.Google Scholar
  30. Moatti, J. P., Dab, W., and Pollak, M. (1992). Les Frannais et le sida... Les comportements 'voluent. La Recherche 247: 1202-1211.Google Scholar
  31. Montada, L. (1992). Attribution of responsibility for losses and perceived injustice. In Montada, L., Filipp, S. H., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Life Crises and the Experience of Loss in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 133-161.Google Scholar
  32. Montada, L. (1998). Belief in a just world: A hybrid of justice motive and self-interest? In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimization and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (1998). Responses to Victimization and Belief in a Just World. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Nishimura, H., and Takahashi, Y. (1988). A study on victimization and its correlates among the aged: I. Various aspects of victimization and the vulnerability of victims to harms. Rep. Natl. Res. Inst. Police Sci. 29: 44-61.Google Scholar
  35. Otten, S., and Mummendey, A. (1999). To our benefict or at our expense? Justice considerations in intergroup allocations of positive and negative resources. Soc. Just. Res. 12: 19-38.Google Scholar
  36. Penfold, P. S. (1992). Sexual abuse by therapists: Maintaining the conspiracy of silence. Can. J. Community Ment. Health 11: 5-15.Google Scholar
  37. Penner, L. A., and Finkelstein, M. A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74: 525-537.Google Scholar
  38. Pettigrew, T. F., and Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 25: 57-75.Google Scholar
  39. Pryor, J. B., and Reeder, G.D. (1993). Collective and individual representations of HIV/AIDS stigma. In Pryor, J. B., and Reeder, G. D. (eds.), The Social Psychology of HIV Infection, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 263-286.Google Scholar
  40. Reichle, B., Schneider, A., and Montada, L. (1998). How do observers of victimization preserve their belief in a just world cognitively or actionally? Findings from a longitudinal study. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimization and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Rosewater, L. B. (1993). Counseling battered women. J. Train. Pract. Profession. Psychol. 7: 67-80. (Special Issue: Psychotherapy with women from a feminist perspective.)Google Scholar
  42. Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the National Draft Lottery. J. Soc. Issues 29: 73-93.Google Scholar
  43. Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? J. Soc. Issues 31: 65-89.Google Scholar
  44. Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the Victim, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71: 549-570.Google Scholar
  46. Smith, K. B. (1985). Seeing justice in poverty: The belief in a just world and ideas about inequalities. Soc. Spect. 5: 17-29.Google Scholar
  47. Stahly, G. B. (1988). Psychosocial aspects of the stigma of cancer: An overview. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. 6: 3-27.Google Scholar
  48. Steensma, H., den Hartigh, E., and Lucardie, E. (1994). Social categories, just world belief, locus of control and causal attributions of occupational accidents. Soc. Just. Res. 7: 281-299.Google Scholar
  49. Vala, J., Brito, R., and Lopes, D. (1999). O racismo subtil e o racismo flagrante em Portugal. In Vala, J. (ed.), Novos Racismos: Perspectivas Comparativas, Celta, Oeiras.Google Scholar
  50. Walton, E. (1994). The confrontation clause and the child victim of sexual abuse. Child Adolesc. Soc. Work J. 11: 195-207.Google Scholar
  51. Weiner, B., Perry, R., and Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 55: 738-748.Google Scholar
  52. Zucker, G. S., and Weiner, B. (1993). Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 23: 925-943.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Av das Fornas ArmadasLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations