Skip to main content
Log in

Token Majority: The Work Attitudes of Male Flight Attendants

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the work experiences of men, a traditional workplace majority, as minority members of a female-dominated occupation. We used tokenism and social categorization theories to propose and test a set of hypotheses that link token status (a less than 15% minority) with male flight attendants' work attitudes through intervening psychological and job factors. Survey data from a sample of 236 male and female flight attendants supported a model in which a negative relationship between token status and the work attitudes of job satisfaction and organizational attachment was mediated by low self-esteem, increased role ambiguity, and poor job fit. The uncovering of these previously unmeasured intervening variables strengthens theoretical connections between demography and work outcomes and suggests leverage points for improving the work attitudes of individuals in the minority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.). (1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 1-9). Hertfordshire: HarvesterWheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, H. L., & Perry, J. L. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranya, N., Kushnir, T., & Valency, A. (1986). Organizational commitment in a male-dominated profession. Human Relations, 39, 433-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1996, July 26). Job of a flight attendant is no walk in the clouds. Wall Street Journal, pp. B1, B9.

  • Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. H., & Harquail, C. V. (1991). Career paths and career success in the early career stages of male and female MBAs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39, 54-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipboye, R. L. (1987). Problems and progress of women in management. In K. S. Loziara, M. S. Moskow, & L. D. Tanner (Eds.), Working women: Past, present, and future (pp. 118-153). Washington, DC: BNA Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1995). Job stressors, job involvement and employee health: A test of identity theory. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68, 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J. E. (1987). Men's career advantages in nursing: The principle of Peter. Current Research on Occupations and Professions, 4, 181-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikes, J. E. (1991). When men are the minority: The case of men in nursing. Sociological Quarterly, 32(3), 389-401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, M., & Jardim, A. (1977). The managerial woman. New York: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrebiniak, L. G., & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 555-572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.D. (1992). Anote on the effect of increasing female representation on the evaluation of a previously male-dominated profession. Journal of Psychology, 126, 211-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin, T. (1955). Construction of a new type of attitude measure. Personnel Psychology, 8, 65-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1995). Psychological stress in the workplace. In R. Crandall & P. L. Perrewe (Eds.), Occupational stress: A handbook. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain, B. E., O'Reilly, C. A., III, & Pfeffer, J. (1983). The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 626-641.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntire, S., Moberg, D. J., & Posner, B. Z. (1980). Preferential treatment in preselection decisions according to sex and race. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 738-749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittman, B. S. (1992). Theoretical and methodological issues in the study of organizational demography. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 10, 3-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 408-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. M., & VonGlinow, M.A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisson, A. M., White, R. P., VanVelsor, E., & The Center for Creative Leadership. (1987). Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America's largest corporations? Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottaz, C. J. (1989). An analysis of the relationship between attitudinal commitment and behavioral commitment. Sociological Quarterly, 30, 143-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R., Porter, L., & Steers, R. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, G. P. (1982). From sky girl to flight attendant:Women and the making of a union. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Reilly, C. A., III, Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 299-357). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. D., & Imhoff, A. R. (1997). Women and career development: A decade of research. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 31-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., Lawler, E., III, & Hackman, J. R. (1974). Behavior in organizations. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, C. M. (forthcoming). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management.

  • Rosenberg, M. (1962). The association between self-esteem and anxiety. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1(2), 135-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A. G., III. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, C. T. (1979). Changing places: Men and women in transitional occupations. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, B. (1962). Male nurses: A case study in status contradictions and prestige loss. Social Forces, 41, 31-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangler, E., Gordon, M., & Pipkin, R. (1978). Token women: An empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 28, 960-971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroh, L. K., Brett, J. M., & Reilly, A. H. (1992). All the right stuff: A comparison of female and male managers' career progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 251-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S.Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgment. In D. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (pp. 518-540). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social-cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research, (Vol. 2, pp. 77-121). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., & Avolio, B. J. (1986). A meta-analysis of age differences in job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 33-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, A. S., & Baron, J. N. (1987). So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work. American Sociological Review, 52(5), 574-587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, A. S., & Baron, J. N. (1991) Satisfaction? The psychological impact of gender segregation on women at work. Sociological Quarterly, 32(3), 365-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L. (1989). Gender differences at work: Women and men in nontraditional occupations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L. (1995). Still a man's world: Men who do women's work. Berkeley,CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erika Hayes James.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, J.L., James, E.H. Token Majority: The Work Attitudes of Male Flight Attendants. Sex Roles 45, 299–319 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014305530335

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014305530335

Keywords

Navigation