Skip to main content
Log in

Microbiological and chemical properties of soil associated with macropores at different depths in a red-duplex soil in NSW Australia

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some agricultural soils in South Eastern Australia with duplex profiles have subsoils with high bulk density, which may limit root penetration, water uptake and crop yield. In these soils, a large proportion (up to 80%) of plant roots maybe preferentially located within the macropores or in the soil within 1–10 mm of the macropores, a zone defined as the macropore sheath (MPS). The chemical and microbiological properties of MPS soil manually dissected from a 1–3 mm wide region surrounding the macropores was compared with that of adjacent bulk soil (>10 mm from macropores) at 4 soil depths (0–20 cm, 20–40 cm, 40–60 cm and 60–80 cm). Compared to the bulk soil, the MPS soil had higher organic C, total N, bicarbonate-extractable P, Ca+, Cu, Fe and Mn and supported higher populations of bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., cellulolytic bacteria, cellulolytic fungi, nitrifying bacteria and the root pathogen Pythium.In addition, analysis of carbon substrate utilization patterns showed the microbial community associated with the MPS soil to have higher metabolic activity and greater functional diversity than the microbial community associated with the bulk soil at all soil depths. Phospholipid fatty acids associated with bacteria and fungi were also shown to be present in higher relative amounts in the MPS soil compared to the bulk soil. Whilst populations of microbial functional groups in the MPS and the bulk soil declined with increasing soil depth, the differentiation between the two soils in microbiological properties occurred at all soil depths. Soil aggregates (< 0.5 mm diameter) associated with plant roots located within macropores were found to support a microbial community that was quantitatively and functionally different to that in the MPS soil and the bulk soil at all soil depths. The microbial community associated with these soil aggregates thus represented a third recognizable environment for plant roots and microorganisms in the subsoil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken R M and Smucker A J M 1996 Root system regulation of whole plant growth. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 34, 325–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander M 1977 Introduction to soil microbiology. pp 19–83. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali-Shtayeh M S, Len L-H C and Dick M W 1986 An improved method andmedium for quantitative estimates of Pythium species from soil. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 86, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker G H, Carter P J, Barrett V J, Kilpin G P, Buckerfield J C and Dalby P R 1994 The introduction and management of earthworms to improve soil structure and fertility in south-eastern Australia. In Soil Biota: Management in Sustainable Farming Systems. Eds. Pankhurst C E, Doube B M, Gupta V V S R and Grace B R. pp 42–49. CSIRO, East Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellgard S E 1993 The topsoil as the major store of the propagules of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in southeast Australian sandstone soils. Mycorrhiza 3, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown G G 1995 How do earthworms affect microfloral and faunal community diversity? Plant Soil 170, 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell H P and Kirkegaard J A 1995 Subsoil amelioration by plant roots-the process and the evidence. Aust. J. Soil Res. 33, 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doube B M, Stephens P M, Davoren C W and Ryder M H 1994 Earthworms and the introduction and management of beneficial soil microorganisms. In Soil Biota: Management in Sustainable Farming Systems. Eds. Pankhurst C E, Doube B M, Gupta V V S R and Grace P R. pp 32–41. CSIRO, East Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V V S R and Roper M M 1994 A most-probable-number method to enumerate the populations of cellulolytic bacteria and fungi in soils. In Soil Biota: Management in Sustainable Framing Systems, Poster Papers. Ed. Pankhurst C E. pp 115–117. CSIRO, East Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harch B D, Correll R L, Meech W, Kirkby C A and Pankhurst C E 1997 Using the Gini coefficient with BIOLOG substrate utilization data to provide an alternative quantitative measure for comparing bacterial soil communities. J. Microb. Meth. 30, 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby C A, Smythe L J, Cox J W and Chittleborough D J 1997 Phosphorus movement down a toposequence from a landscape with texture contrast soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 35, 399–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P 1988 Earthworm activities and the soil system. Biol. Fert. Soils 6, 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K E 1985 Earthworms. Their Ecology and Relationships with Land Use. 441 pp. Academic Press New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K E and Smettem K R J 1995 Identification and manipulation of soil biopores for the management of subsoil problems. In Subsoil Management Techniques. Eds. Jayawardane N S and Stewart B A. pp 211–244. Lewis Publishers Inc., Boca Raton, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehl D B, Mcgee P A, Torrisi V, Pattinson g S and Allen S J 1999 Patterns of arbuscular mycorrhiza down the profile of a heavy textured soil do not reflect associated colonization potential. New Phytol. 142, 495–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P A 1999 Signature fatty acids provide tools for determination and distribution of mycorrhizal fungi in soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 29, 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst C E, McDonald H J and Hawke B G 1995 Influence of tillage and crop rotation on the epidemiology of Pythium infections of wheat in a red-brown earth of south Australia. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 1065–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst C E, Hawke B G, McDonald H J, Kirkby C A, Bucker-field J C, Michelsen P, O'Brien K A, Gupta V V S R and Doube B M 1995 Evaluation of soil biological properties as potential bioindicators of soil health. Aust. J. Expt. Agric. 35, 1015–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst C E, Yu S, Hawke B G and Harch B D 2001 Capacity of fatty acid profiles and substrate utilization patterns to describe differences in soil microbial communities associated with increased salinity or alkalinity at three locations in South Australia. Biol. Fert. Soils 33, 204–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin T B and Berry E C 1999 Microbial nitrogen transformations in earthworm burrows. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 1765–1771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J B 1991 Soil structure and plant growth. Aust. J Soil Res. 29, 717–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret J, Prasher S O, Kantzas A and Langford C 2000 A twodomain approach using CAT scanning to model solute transport in soil. J. Environ. Qual. 29, 995–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierret A, Moran C J and Pankhurst C E 1999 Differentiation of soil properties related to the spatial association of wheat roots and soil macropores. Plant Soil 211, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasse D P and Smucker A J M 1998 Root recolonization of previous root channels in corn and alfalfa rotations. Plant Soil 204, 203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayment G E and Higginson F R 1992 Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods. Inkata Press, Melbourne. 330pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt E L and Belser L W 1994 Autotrophic nitrifying bacteria. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. Editorial committee R W Weaver chair. pp 159–178. Soil Science Society of America Inc, Madison WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva R G, Cameron K C, Di H J, Smith N P and Buchan G D 2000 Effect of macropore flow on the transport of surface-applied cow urine through a soil profile. Aust. J. Soil Res. 38, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff 1998 Keys to soil taxonomy. U.S.D.A., Natural Resources Conservation Service.

  • Stewart J B, Moran C J and Wood J T 1999 Macropore sheath: quantification of plant root and soil macropore association. Plant Soil 211, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiunov A V and Scheu S 1999 Microbial respiration, biomass, biovolume and nutrient status in burrow walls of Lumbricus terrestris L. (Lumbricidae). Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 2039–2048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner N C, Perry M W, Gregory P J and Belford R K 1992 Crop production on duplex soils. Aust. J. Expt. Agric. 32, 797–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinther F P, Eiland F, Lind A-M and Elsgaard J 1999 Microbial biomass and numbers of denitrifiers related to macropore channels in agricultural and forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 603–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zogg G P, Zak D R, Ringelberg D B, MacDonald N W, Pregitzer K S and White D C 1997 Compositional and functional shifts in microbial communities due to soil warming. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 475–481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pankhurst, C., Pierret, A., Hawke, B. et al. Microbiological and chemical properties of soil associated with macropores at different depths in a red-duplex soil in NSW Australia. Plant and Soil 238, 11–20 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014289632453

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014289632453

Navigation