Skip to main content
Log in

Optimality and Functionality: Objections and Refutations

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Aissen, Judith. 1999. 'Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory,' Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17, 673-711. Reprinted in Legendre et al. (eds.), pp. 61-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aissen, Judith. 2000. 'Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy’ Draft on-line, University of California, Santa Cruz: http://ling.ucsc.edu/~aissen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Stephen R. 1977. 'On Mechanisms by which Languages become Ergative’ in C. N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 317-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Stephen R. 1988. 'Morphological Change’ in F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 324-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anttila, Arto. 1997a. Variation in Finnish Phonology and Morphology, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anttila, Arto. 1997b. 'Deriving Variation from Grammar’ in Hinskens et al. (eds.), pp. 35-68.

  • Anttila, Arto. In press. 'Variation and Phonological Theory’ in J. Chambers, P. Trudgill and N. Schilling-Estes (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Anttila, Arto and Vivienne Fong. 2000. 'The Partitive Constraint in Optimality Theory’ Journal of Semantics 17, 281-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariel, Mira. 1991. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltin, Mark and Chris Collins (eds.). 2001. The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Chris. 1998. 'Partitives, Double Genitives, and Anti-Uniqueness’ Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16, 679-717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birner, Betty and Gregory Ward. 1998. Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, Paul. 1997. 'HowWe Learn Variation, Optionality, and Probability’ Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences 21, 43-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional Phonology: Formalizing the Interactions between Articulatory and Perceptual Drives, Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, Paul. 2000. 'Learning a Grammar in Functional Phonology’ in J. Dekkers, F. v. d. Leeuw and J. v. d. Weijer (eds.), Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 465-523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, Paul and Bruce Hayes. 2001. 'Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm’ Linguistic Inquiry 32, 45-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan. 2001a. 'Explaining Morphosyntactic Competition’ in Baltin and Collins (eds.), pp. 11-44.

  • Bresnan, Joan. 2001b. 'The Emergence of the Unmarked Pronoun’ in Legendre et al. (eds.), pp. 113-142.

  • Bresnan, Joan. 2002. 'The Lexicon in Optimality Theory’ in S. Stevenson and P. Merlo (eds.), The Lexical Basis of Sentence Processing: Formal, Computational, and Experimental Issues, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 39-58. Draft on-line, Stanford University: http://www-lfg.stanford.edu/bresnan/download.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan, Shipra Dingare and Christopher Manning. 2001. 'Soft Constraints Mirror Hard Constraints: Voice and Person in English and Lummi’ in M. Butt and T. H. King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, University of Hong Kong, on-line proceedings, CSLI Publications, Stanford: http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, Edward J. 2000. 'Grammatical Acquisition: Inductive Bias and Co-evolution of Language and the Language Acquisition Device’ Language 76, 245-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra. 1978. Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooreman, Ann. 1982. 'Topicality, Ergativity and Transitivity in Narrative Discourse: Evidence from Chamorro’ Studies in Language 6, 343-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooreman, Ann. 1987. Transitivity and Discourse Continuity in Chamorro Narratives. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, João. 2001. 'The Emergence of Unmarked Word Order’ in Legendre et al. (eds.), pp. 171-203.

  • Deane, Paul. 1987. 'English Possessives, Topicality, and the Silverstein Hierarchy’ Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA, pp. 65-77.

  • Dingare, Shipra. 2001. The Effect of Feature Hierarchies on Frequencies of Passivization in English. Master's thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. On-line, Rutgers Optimality Archive: http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/roa.html.ROA-467-0901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David. 1991. 'Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection’ Language 67, 547-619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estival, Dominique and John Myhill. 1988. 'Formal and Functional Aspects of the Development from Passive to Ergative Systems’ in M. Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 441-491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, Linda. 1994. 'The De-Transitive Clauses in Bella Coola: Passive vs. Inverse’ in T. Givón (ed.), pp. 147-168.

  • Garrett, Andrew. 1990. 'The Origin of NP Split Ergativity’ Language 66, 261-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón, Talmy. 1994. 'The Pragmatics of De-Transitive Voice: Functional and Typological Aspects of Inversion’ in T. Givón (ed.), 1994, pp. 3-44.

  • Givón, Talmy (ed.). 1994. Voice and Inversion, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Roger. 1981. 'Towards an Account of the Possessive Constructions: NP's N and the N of NP’ Journal of Linguistics 17, 179-392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinskens, Frans, Roeland van Hout, and W. Leo Wetzels (eds.). 1997. Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, Eloise and Richard Demers. 1983. 'The Agent Hierarchy and Voice in some Coast Salish Languages’ IJAL 49, 165-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, Simon. 1998. Function, Selection and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, Anthony. 2001. 'syntactic Change’ in Baltin and Collins, (eds), pp. 699-729.

  • Lee, Hanjung. 2001. Optimization in Argument Expression and Interpretation: A Unified Approach, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, Géraldine, Jane Grimshaw, and Sten Vikner (eds.). 2001. Optimality-Theoretic Syntax, Bradford Books and The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, Géraldine, William Raymond, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. 'An Optimality-Theoretic Typology of Case and Grammatical Voice Systems’ Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA, pp. 464-478.

  • Lyons, Christopher. 1985. 'The Syntax of English Genitive Constructions’ Journal of Linguistics 22, 123-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J. and Alan S. Prince. 1994. 'The Emergence of the Unmarked. Optimality in Prosodic Morphology’ Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, University of Massachusetts GLSA, Amherst, MA, pp. 333-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmeyer, Frederick. 1998. Language Form and Language Function, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmeyer, Frederick. 2000. 'Optimality and Functionality: Some Critical Remarks on OT Syntax’ Draft on-line, Rutgers Optimality Archive: http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/roa.html. ROA-402-08100.

  • Newmeyer, Frederick. 2002 (this volume). 'Optimality and Functionality: A Critique of Functionally-Based Optimality-Theoretic Syntax’ Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 43-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, Mary Catherine. 1999. 'Harmonic Alignment of Participant Hierarchy Features and the Structure of Possessive DP's in Northern Pomo’ Joint UCSC/StanfordWorkshop on Optimal Typology, UCSC.

  • O'Connor, Mary Catherine. 1999. 'The Interaction of Syntax and Pragmatics in Northern Pomo: Towards an Optimal Solution’ LFG1999, University of Manchester.

  • Oostendorp, Marc von. 1997. 'style Levels in Conflict Resolution’ in Hinskens et al. (eds.), pp. 35-68.

  • Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar, RuCCS Technical Report #2, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, Piscataway, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbach, Anette. 2000. Genitive Variation in English. Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies, University of Düsseldorf doctoral dissertation, Düsseldorf, Germany.

  • Rosenbach, Anette. To appear. 'Aspects of Iconicity and Economy in the Choice between the s-genitive and the of-genitive in English’ in B. Mondorf and G. Rohdenburg (eds.), Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, (Topics in English Linguistics), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

  • Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.). 1988. Passive and Voice, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Sandra A. 1987. 'The passive in English: A Discourse Perspective’ in R.Channon and L. Shockey (eds.), In Honor of Ilse Lehiste, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 497-511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trask, Robert L. 1979. 'On the Origin of Ergativity’ in F. Plank (ed.), Ergativity. Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Academic Press, New York, pp. 385-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Tessa and Edward Gibson. 2001. 'The Influence of Referential Processing on Sentence Complexity’ ms., MIT Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. 'Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change’ in W. P. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics. A Symposium, University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 95-188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aissen, J., Bresnan, J. Optimality and Functionality: Objections and Refutations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 81–95 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014222605182

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014222605182

Keywords

Navigation