Skip to main content
Log in

Direct Evidence for the Homo—Pan Clade

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a long time, the evolutionary relationship between human and African apes, the 'trichotomy problem', has been debated with strong differences in opinion and interpretation. Statistical analyses of different molecular DNA data sets have been carried out and have primarily supported a Homo—Pan clade. An alternative way to address this question is by the comparison of evolutionarily relevant chromosomal breakpoints. Here, we made use of a P1-derived artificial chromosome (PAC)/bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) contig spanning approximately 2.8 Mb on the long arm of the human Y chromosome, to comparatively map individual PAC clones to chromosomes from great apes, gibbons, and two species of Old World monkeys by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. During our search for evolutionary breakpoints on the Y chromosome, it transpired that a transposition of an approximately 100-kb DNA fragment from chromosome 1 onto the Y chromosome must have occurred in a common ancestor of human, chimpanzee and bonobo. Only the Y chromosomes of these three species contain the chromosome-1-derived fragment; it could not be detected on the Y chromosomes of gorillas or the other primates examined. Thus, this shared derived (synapomorphic) trait provides clear evidence for a Homo—Pan clade independent of DNA sequence analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews P (1992) Evolution and environment in the hominoidea. Nature 360: 641–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caccone A, Powell JR (1989) DNA divergence among hominoids. Evolution 43: 925–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen F-C, Li W-H (2001) Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. Am J Hum Genet 68: 444–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djian P, Green H (1989) Vectorial expansion of the involucrin gene and the relatedness of the hominoids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 8447–8451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris SD, Wilson AC, Brown WM (1981) Evolutionarytree for apes and humans based on cleavage maps of mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 2432–2436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs S, Collard M, Woods B (2000) Soft-tissue characters in higher primate phylogenetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 11130–11132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gläser B, Grützner F, Willmann U et al. (1998) Simian Y chromosomes: species-specific rearrangements of DAZ, RBM, and TSPY versus contiguityof PAR and SRY. Mammalian Genome 9: 226–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gläser B, Myrtek D, Rumpler Y et al. (1999) Transposition of SRY into the ancestral pseudoautosomal region creates a new pseudoautosomal boundaryin a progenitor of simian primates. Hum Mol Genet 8: 2071–2078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman D, Rathna Giri P, O'Brien SJ (1987) A molecular phylogeny of the hominoid primates as indicated by two-dimensional protein electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 3307–3311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman M, Porter CA, Czelusniak J et al. (1998) Toward a phylogenetic classification of primates based on DNA evidence complemented byfossil evidence. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9: 585–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horai S, Satta Y, Hayasaka K et al. (1992) Man's place in hominoidea revealed bymitochondrial DNA genealogy. J Mol Evol 35: 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley TH (1863) Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature. New York: P. Appleton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch A, Wienberg J, Stanyon R et al. (1992) Reconstruction of genomic rearrangements in great apes and gibbons by chromosome painting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 8611–8615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji Y, Eichler EE, Schwartz S, Nicholls RD (2000) Structure of chromosomal duplicons and their role in mediating human genomic disorders. Genome Res 10: 597–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobling MA, Tyler-Smith C (2000) New uses for new haplotypes, the human Y chromosome, disease and selection. Trends Genet 16: 356–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura S, Tanabe H, Watanabe Y, Kurosaki K, Saitou N, Ueda S (1991) Evolutionaryrate of immunoglobulin alpha noncoding region is greater in hominoids than in Old World monkeys. Mol Biol Evol 8: 743–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahn BT, Page D (1999) Four evolutionarystrata on the human X chromosome. Science 286: 964–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RD (1993) Primate origins: plugging the gaps. Nature 363: 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao E, Weiss B, Fukami M et al. (1997) Pseudoautosomal deletions encompassing a novel homeobox gene cause growth failure in idiopathic short stature and Turner syndrome. Nature Genet 16: 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ried T, Lengauer C, Cremer T et al. (1992) Specific metaphase and interphase detection of the breakpoint region in 8q24 of Burkitt lymphoma cells by triple-color fluorescent in situ hybridization. Genes Chrom Cancer 4: 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers J (1994) Levels of the genealogical hierarchy and the problem of hominoid phylogeny. Am J Phys Anthropol 94: 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruvolo M (1997) Molecular phylogeny of the hominoids: inferences from multiple independent DNA sequence data sets. MolBiolEvol 14: 248–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent CA, Boucher CA, Kirsch S et al. (1999) The critical region of overlap defining the AZFa male infertilityinterval of proximal Yq contains three transcribed sequences. J Med Genet 36: 670–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarich V, Wilson AC (1967) Immunological time scale for hominid evolution. Science 158: 1200–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satta Y, Klein J, Takahata N (2000) DNA archives and our nearest relative: the trichotomyproblem revisited. Mol Phylogenet Evol 14: 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schempp W, Binkele A, Arnemann J et al. (1995) Comparative mapping of YRRM- and TSPY-related cosmids in man and hominoid apes. Chrom Res 3: 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semino O, Passarino G, Oefner PJ et al. (2000) The genetic legacyof paleolithic Homo sapiens sapiens in extant Europeans: a Y chromosome perspective. Science 290: 1155–1159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen P, Wang F, Underhill PA et al. (2000) Population genetics implications from sequence variation in four Y chromosome genes. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97: 7354–7359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley CG, Alquist JE (1984) The phylogeny of the hominoid primates, as indicated by DNA–DNA hybridization. Mol Evol 20: 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley CG, Alquist JE (1987) DNA hybridization evidence of hominoid phylogeny, results from an expanded data set. J Mol Evol 26: 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley CG, Comstock JA, Alquist JE (1990) DNA hybridization evidence of hominoid phylogeny: reanalysis of the data. J Mol Evol 30: 202–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit AFA, Riggs AD (1996) Tiggers and other DNA transposon fossils in the human genome. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 93: 1443–1448.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wimmer, R., Kirsch, S., Rappold, G.A. et al. Direct Evidence for the Homo—Pan Clade. Chromosome Res 10, 55–61 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014222311431

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014222311431

Navigation