Skip to main content
Log in

A Rejoinder to Bresnan and Aissen

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Bresnan, Joan W. and Judith Aissen. 2001. 'Optionality and Functionality: Objections and Refutations’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 81-95 (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: 2nd Edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, Geoffrey E. and S. J. Nowlan. 1987. 'How Learning Can Guide Evolution’ Complex Systems 1, 495-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, Paul J. 1987. 'Emergent Grammar’ Berkeley Linguistics Society 13, 139-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George. 1974. 'Interview’ in H. Parret (ed.), Discussing Language: Dialogues with Wallace L. Chafe, Noam Chomsky, Algirdas J. Greimas [and Others], Mouton, The Hague, pp. 151-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1986. Linguistic Theory in America: Second Edition, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language Form and Language Function, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, Russell S. 1986. Basic Word Order: Functional Principles, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newmeyer, F.J. A Rejoinder to Bresnan and Aissen. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 97–99 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014213624881

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014213624881

Keywords

Navigation