Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a Psychology of Societal Change and Stability: The Case of Human Rights and Duties

  • Published:
International Journal of Group Tensions

Abstract

A distinction is made between two types of psychology concerned with: performance capacity, the abilities of individuals tested in isolation; and performance style, the way things get done and the meanings ascribed to phenomena. Causal explanations are appropriate for performance capacity, and normative ones for performance style. Traditional psychology has focused predominantly on performance capacity and causation. Societal change and stability, it is argued, involves meaning systems and are best understood in terms of performance style and normative models. Stability is achieved through “carriers,” flexible vehicles that help to sustain meaning systems. As our illustrative example, we consider the topic of human rights and duties. Carriers in some situations widen a gap between formal law and actual behavior. This gap, we argue, is in part due to the faster maximum speed of change in legal and other macrolevel spheres, relative to the psychological level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International U.S.A. (1998). Rights for all. New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International U.S.A. (1999). Statement of Dr. William F. Schulz, Executive Director, Amnesty International U.S.A. Press Release, June 8, 1999, Washington DC.

  • Asian Journal of Social Psychology. (1998), 1.

  • Avineri, S., & de-Shalit, A. (Eds.). (1992). Communitarianism and individualism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2000). Social psychology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1958). Two concepts of liberty. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, S. B. (1995). Discrimination, death, and denial: The toleration of racial discrimination in infliction of the death penalty. Santa Clara Law Review, February, 107–113.

  • Caplan, N., Choy, M. H., & Whitmore, J. K. (1992). Indochinese refugee families and academic achievement. Scientific American, 266, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, L. (1998). The annotated Alice: Alice's adventures in wonderland; Through the looking glass. New York: Random House (original work published 1871).

  • Cassin, R. (1972). La pens´ee et l'action. Paris: Lalou.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirot, D., & Seligman, M. E. P. (Eds). (2001). Ethnopolitical warfare: Causes, consequences, and possible solutions. Washington DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clémence, A., Doise, W., de Rosa, A. S., & Gonzalez, L. (1995). La représentation sociale des droits de l'homme: Une recherche internationale sur l'étendue et les limites de l'universalité. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 181–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W., Spini, D., & Clémence, A. (1999). Human rights studied as social representations in a cross-national context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W., Staerklé, C., Clémence, A., & Savory, F. (1998). Human rights and Genevan youth: A developmental study of social representations. The Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 86–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimas, A. (1993). The perception of speech in early infancy. Scientific American, 204, 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N. P., Renwick, S., & Malone, B. (1983). The relationship between moral reasoning and political orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1073–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. (2000). Context is everything: The nature of memory. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figes, O., & Kolonitskii, B. (1999). Interpreting the Russian Revolution: The language and symbols of 1917. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, N. (1995). Commonsense justice: Jurors' notions of the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D., & Prilleltensky, I. (Eds.). (1997). Critical psychology: An introduction. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallatin, J., & Adelson, J. (1971). Legal guarantees of individual freedom: A crossnationalstudy of the development of political thought. Journal of Social Issues, 27, 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, selfesteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harff, B. (1987). Empathy for victims of massive human rights violations and support for government intervention: A comparative study of American and Australian attitudes. Political Psychology, 8, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, A. R. (1966). Origins of the common law. Bloomingdale: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm, A. F. (1990). The epidemiology of Alzheimer's and related disorders. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalat, J. W. (1999). Introduction to psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove: Brooks Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauren, P. G. (1998). The evolution of international human rights: Visions seen. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessnoff, M. (Ed.). (1990). Social contract theory. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B., & Maluso, D. (Eds.). (1995). The social psychology of interpersonal discrimination. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays, V. M., Rubin, J., Sabourin, M., & Walker, L. (1996). Moving toward a global psychology: Changing theories and practice to meet the needs of a changing world. American Psychologist, 51, 485–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midlebrook, D., & Edwards, D. (Eds.). (1990). Collective remembering. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlebrook, K. J. (1995). The paradox of revolution: Labor, state, and authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G., & Bersoff, D. M. (1994). Cultural influences on the moral status of reciprocity and the discounting of endogenous motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 592–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M. (1997). The specialized society: The plight of the individual in an age of individualism. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M. (1998). Social psychology: Exploring universals across cultures. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M. (1999). Carriers and change. Cross-Cultural Psychology Bulletin, 33, 11–17, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M. (2002). The individual and society: A cultural integration. New York: Worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M. (2000). Toward a cultural theory of human rights. Theory & Psychology, 10, 291–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M., Bianchi, C., Daniels, K., & Harré, R. (1999). Psychology and national development. Psychology and Developing Societies, 11, 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M., & Crystal, D. (1997). Reductons, samurai and revolutions: The paradoxes of change and continuity in Iran and Japan. Journal of Political Psychology, 18, 355–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M., & Harré, R. (1995). But is it science? Traditional and alternative approaches to the study of social behavior. World Psychology, 1, 47–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M., & Harré, R. (1996). Psychological limitations to political revolutions: An application of social reducton theory. In E. Hasselberg, L. Martienssen & F. Radtke (Eds.), Der Dialogbegriff am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts [The concept of dialogue at the end of the 20th century]. Berlin: Hegel Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M., & Taylor, D. M. (1985). Psychology in the developing world: An evaluation through the concepts of “dual perception” and “parallel growth.” American Psychologist, 40, 1144–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M., & Vuksanovic, V. (1990). Attitudes and behavior toward human rights across different contexts: The role of right-wing authoritarianism, political ideology, and religiosity. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 455–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. H., & Merrillis, J. G. (1996). Human rights in the world. New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. R. (1988). Psychology and United Nations Human Rights efforts. American Psychologist, 43, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabat, S. (2001). The experience of Alzheimer's disease: Life through a tangled veil. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. (1981). Cognitive psychology as ideology. American Psychologist, 36, 730–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, D. L. (1996). Searching for memory. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1995). Gender differences in science careers: The project access study. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, P., & Durkin, K. (1987). Moral reasoning and political orientation: The context sensitivity of political rights and democratic principles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 931–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spini, D., & Doise, W. (1998). Organizing principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 603–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stover, E., & Nightingale, E. O. (Eds.). (1985). The breaking of bodies and minds: Torture, psychiatric abuse, and the health professions. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, F. R. (1986). Substantive due process of law. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, S. (1999). Written in blood: Ethnic identity and the struggle for human harmony. New York: Worth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moghaddam, F.M., Lvina, E. Toward a Psychology of Societal Change and Stability: The Case of Human Rights and Duties. International Journal of Group Tensions 31, 31–51 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014212700468

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014212700468

Navigation