Abstract
The paper tries to demonstrate how it is possible to gain evidencefor the detailed structure of grammatical systems by investigating languagechange. The decisive methodological question is: How must a system be structuredso that a certain change can take place? The paper presents several morphologicalchanges from the history of Germanic languages, on the basis of which someimportant questions concerning the structure of morphological lexicon representationscan be answered in a justified manner. Altogether, it is intended to contributeto the defeat of the fruitless strict separation of synchrony from diachronyin linguistics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bittner, A. 1996. Starke 'schwache' Verben-schwache 'starke' Verben. Deutsche Verb-flexion und Natürlichkeit. Stauffenburg, Tübingen.
DUDEN. 1996. Duden. Rechtschreibung der deutschen Sprache, 21. Auflage. Dudenverlag, Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, Zürich.
Kiparsky, P. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In: Bach, E.-Harms, R. (eds): Universals in linguistic theory, 171–202. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Vennemann, T. 1989. Language change as language improvement. In: Orioloes, V. (ed.): Modelli esplicativi della diacronia linguistica, 11–35 Giardini Editori, Pisa.
Wunderlich, D.-Fabri, R. 1995. Minimalist morphology. In: Zeitschrift für Sprachwis-senschaft 14: 236–94.
Wurzel, W.U. 1994. Grammatisch initiierter Wandel. Unter Mitarbeit von A. Bittner und D. Bittner. Projekt-Prinzipien des Sprachwandels-. Brockmeyer, Bochum.
Wurzel, W.U. In prep. Von der Diachronie zur Synchronie: Zur Struktur von Lexikonreprä-sentationen, Flexionsformen, Flexionsparadigmen und Flexionssystemen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wurzel, W.U. Morphological properties in the lexicon: Diachronic evidence. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47, 345–356 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014078918528
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014078918528