Abstract
p-Cresol at 17 mg l−1 in a nitrifying culture inhibited by 70% nitrate formation whereas at 10 mg l−1 there was no effect. p-Cresol at 220, 470, and 910 mg l−1 was converted to intermediates after adaptation times of 8 h, 24 h, and 40 h, respectively. The sludge recovered 44% of its activity after transformation of p-cresol.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes D, Bliss PJ (1983) Biological Control of Nitrogen in Wastewater Treatment., London: E & FN Spon Ldt., p. 33.
Benmoussa H, Martin G, Tonnard F, Richard Y, Leprince A (1986) Inhibition study of the nitrification by organic compounds. Water Res. 20: 1465-1470.
Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
Dyreborg S, Arvin E (1995) Inhibition of nitrification by creosotecontaminated water. Water Res. 29: 1603-1606.
Gernaey K, Maffei D, Vanrolleghem P, Verstraete W (1999) A new pH-based procedure to model toxic effects on nitrifiers in activated sludge. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 74: 679-687.
Kennes C, Lema JM (1994) Biodegradation of major compounds of creosotes (PAH and phenols) by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Biotechnol. Lett. 16: 759-764.
Kennes C, Mendez R, Lema JM (1997) Methanogenic degradation of p-cresol in batch and in continuous UASB reactors. Water Res. 31: 1549-1554.
Massone A, Gernaey K, Rozzi A, Verstraete W (1998) Measurement of ammonium concentration and nitrification rate by a new titrimeter biosensor. Wat. Environ. Res. 70: 343-350.
Ramanand K, Sulfita JM (1993) Carboxylation and mineralization of m-cresol by a sulfate-reducing bacterial enrichment. Curr. Microbiol. 26: 327-332.
Stafford DA (1974) The effect of phenols and heterocyclic bases on nitrification in activated sludge. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 37: 75-82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Texier, AC., Gomez, J. Tolerance of nitrifying sludge to p-cresol. Biotechnology Letters 24, 321–324 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014057907953
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014057907953