Skip to main content
Log in

The Nature of the Firm – Static versus Developmental Interpretations

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different from the prevailing staticperspective in the theory of the firm, adevelopmental approach focuses on processes ofchange in firm organizations (rather than onstates and their properties). Although businesshistory provides ample evidence for systematicorganizational change, few contributions in theliterature take a developmental viewpoint andoffer explanations for the endogenous processesof change. To contrast static and developmentalinterpretations, the paper identifies threeparadigmatic questions for each of them. Theircomparison sheds some new light on the theoryof the firm and draws attention to theneglected entrepreneurial role inorganizational change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy, W.J. and J.M. Utterback: 1978, “Patterns of Industrial Innovation”, Technology Review 80: 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. and J. Tirole: 1997, “Formal and Real Authority in Organizations”, Journal of Political Economy 105(1): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A.: 1950, “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory”, Journal of Political Economy 58: 211–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A.: 1953, “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm: Comment”, American Economic Review (4): 600–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A. and H. Demsetz: 1972, “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization”, American Economic Review 62: 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H.E.: 1979, Organizations and Environments (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H.E.: 1999, Organizations Evolving (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhidé, A.V.: 2000, The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G.R.: 1984, “Organizational Ecology”, Annual Review of Sociology (10): 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.: 1977, The Visible Hand. The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D.: 1962, Strategy and Structure. Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D.: 1990, Scale and Scope. The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge: Belknap Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D.: 1992, “Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(3): 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S.: 1983, “The Contractual Nature of the Firm”, Journal of Law and Economics 26: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K.B.: 1985, “The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and Market Concepts in Technological Evolution”, Research Policy 14: 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.: 1937, “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica 4: 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal: 1990, “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H.: 1991, “The Theory of the Firm Revisited”, in O.E. Williamson and S.G. Winter (eds.), The Nature of the Firm. Origins, Evolution, and Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. and R.R. Nelson: 1994, “An Introduction to Evolutionary Theories in Economics”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 4: 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N.J. (ed.): 1997, Resources, Firms, and Strategies. A Reader in the Resource-Based Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N.J.: 1997a, “The Resource-Based Perspective: An Assessment and Diagnosis of Problems”, DRUID Working Paper No. 97-01, Copenhagen Business School.

  • Foss, N.J.: 2000, “The Theory of the Firm: An Introduction to Themes and Contributions”, in N.J. Foss (ed.), The Theory of the Firm. Critical Perspectives on Business and Management (London: Routledge), pp. xv–lxi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransman, M.: 1999, Visions of Innovation. The Firm and Japan (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A.: 1997, “Governance Structures, Coordination Mechanisms and Cognitive Models”, Journal of Management and Governance 1: 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A.: 2000, “Conjectures for a New Research Agenda on Governance”, Journal of Management and Governance 4: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S.J. and O.D. Hart: 1986a, “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration”, Journal of Political Economy 94: 691–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and J. Freeman: 1989, Organizational Ecology (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. and B. Holmström: 1987b, “The Theory of Contracts”, in T. Bewley (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. and J. Moore: 1990, “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm”, Journal of Political Economy 98(6): 1119–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B. and P. Milgrom: 1991, “Multitask Principial-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7: 24–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B. and P. Milgrom: 1994, “The Firm as an Incentive System”, American Economic Review 84(4): 972–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B.R. and J. Tirole: 1989, “The Theory of the Firm”, in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume I (Amsterdam: North-Holland), pp. 61–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling: 1976, “Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., R.G. Crawford and A.A. Alchian: 1978, “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process”, Journal of Law and Economics 21: 297–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S.: 1997, “Industry Life Cycles”, Industrial and Corporate Change 6(1): 145–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S. and K.L. Simons: 1997, “Technological Extinctions of Industrial Firms: An Onquiry into Their Nature and Causes”, Industrial and Corporate Change 6(2): 379–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and U. Zander: 1992, “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology”, Organization Science 3: 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M.: 1990, “Corporate Colture and Economic Theory”, in J.E. Alt and K.A. Shepsle (eds.), Perspectives on positive Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 90–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. (ed.): 1986, Economics as a Process. Essays in the New Institutional Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N.: 1992, “Transaction-Cost Economics in Real Time”, Industrial and Corporate Change 1(1): 99–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. and P.L. Robertson: 1995, Firms, Markets and Economic Change. A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B.J.: 1991, Equilibrium and Evolution. An Exploration of connecting Principles in Economics (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J.S.: 1994, “Competition, Fisher's Principle and Increasing Returns in the Selection Process”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 4: 327–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J.S. and M. Gibbons: 1988, “Technology, Variety and Organisation: A Systematic Perspective on the Competitive Process”, in R.S. Rosenbloom and R.A. Burgelman (eds.), Research on Technological Innovation, Management, and Policy (Greenwich: JAI Press), pp. 153–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C.: 1972, “A Life Cycle Theory of the Firm”, Journal of Industrial Economics 20: 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C.: 1996, On the Decline of Nations (Jena: Lectiones Jenenses).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R.: 1991, “Why Do Firms Differ, and How Does It Matter?”, Strategic Management Journal 12: 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R.: 1995, “Recent Evolutionary Theorising about Economic Change”, Journal of Economic Literature 23: 48–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter: 1978, “Forces Generating and Limiting Concentration und Schumpeterian Competition”, Bell Journal of Economics 9: 524–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.: 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 2nd edn (1995) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.T.: 1952, “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm”, American Economic Review 42(5): 804–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.T.: 1953, “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm: Rejoinder”, American Economic Review (4): 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R.E. and K. Cameron: 1983, “Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence”, Management Science 29(1): 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G.B.: 1972, “The Organisation of Industry”, The Economic Journal 82: 883–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Z.: 2000, “Governance in Organizations: A Cognitive Perspective”, Journal of Management and Governance 4: 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg, G., G. Dosi and L. Orsenigo: 1988, “Innovation, Diversity, and Diffusion: A Self Organizing Model”, Economic Journal 98: 1032–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1951, “A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship”, Econometrica 19: 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T.E. and J.M. Podolny: 1996, “Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities”, Strategic Management Journal 17: 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J.: 1980, “Economies of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 223–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R.: 1993, “The Firm and Technological Change: From Managerial Capitalism to Nineteenth-Century Innovation and Back Again”, Business and Economic History 22(2): 99–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies. Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U.: 1989, “Review of R.N. Langlois (ed)., Economics as a Process. Essays in the New Institutional Economics”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 145: 741–745.

  • Witt, U.: 1993, “Emergence and Dissemination of Innovations - Some Problems and Principles of Evolutionary Economics”, in R. Day and P. Chen (eds.), Nonlinear Dynamics and Evolutionary Economics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U.: 1998a, Between Entrepreneurial Leadership and Managerial Governance - the Contingent Ontogeny of the Firm Organization. Paper prepared for the DRUID Summer Conference on Competencies, Governance and Entrepreneurship, Bornholm, June 9-11, 1998.

  • Witt, U.: 1998b, “Imagination and Leadership - The Neglected Dimension of an Evolutionary Theory of the Firm”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35: 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U.: 2000, “Changing Cognitive Frames - Changing Organizational Forms: An Entrepreneurial Theory of Organizational Development”, Industrial and Corporate Change 9(4): 733–755.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rathe, K., Witt, U. The Nature of the Firm – Static versus Developmental Interpretations. Journal of Management & Governance 5, 331–351 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014051112548

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014051112548

Keywords

Navigation