Skip to main content
Log in

Child Labor and Multinational Conduct: A Comparison of International Business andStakeholder Codes

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing attention to the issue of child labor has been reflected in codes of conduct that emerged in the past decade in particular. This paper examines the way in which multinationals, business associations, governmental and non-governmental organizations deal with child labor in their codes. With a standardized framework, it analyzes 55 codes drawn up by these different actors to influence firms’ external, societal behavior. The exploratory study helps to identify the main issues related to child labor and the use of voluntary instruments such as codes of conduct. Apart from a specific indication of the topics covered by the code, especially minimum-age requirements, this also includes monitoring systems and monitoring parties. Most important to company codes are the sanctions imposed on business partners in case of non-compliance. Severe measures may be counterproductive as they do not change the underlying causes of child labor and can worsen the situation of the child workers by driving them to more hazardous work in the informal sector. This underlines the importance of a broad rather than a restrictive approach to child labor in codes of conduct. The paper discusses the implications of this study, offering suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basu, K.: 1999a, ‘Child Labor: Cause, Consequence, and Cure, with Remarks on International Labor Standards’, Journal of Economic Literature XXXVII, 1083-1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K.: 1999b, ‘International Labor Standards and Child Labor’, Challenge (September-October), 80-93.

  • Bowie, N. and P. Vaaler: 1999, ‘Some Arguments for Universal Moral Standards’, in G. Enderle (ed.), International Business Ethics. Challenges and Approaches (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN), pp. 160-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, P. F., J. J. Kohls and K. S. Andersen: 1997, ‘A Model for Addressing Cross-cultural Ethical Conflicts’, Business and Society 26(2), 169-193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleek, M. A. and S. L. Leonard: 1998, ‘Can Corporate Codes of Ethics Influence Behavior?’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 619-630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.: 1997, ‘Fundamental Rights and Multinational Duties’, in N. E. Bowie (ed.), Ethical Theory and Business, Fifth Edition (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ), pp. 535-545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, A. and M. Jankanish: 1997, Trade Unions and Child Labour (ILO, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • George, I.: 1990, Child Labour and Child Work (Ashish Publishing House, New Delhi).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, L. P., B. Shaw and R. Stevenson: 1999, ‘Balancing Sweatshop Ethics and Economics’ Labor Standards Working Paper No. 9901 <http://www.ssrn.com>.

  • Hindman, H. D. and C. G. Smith: 1999, ‘Crosscultural Ethics and the Child Labor Problem’, Journal of Business Ethics 19, 21-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K. T.: 1997, ‘Globalizing Corporate Ethics Programs: Perils and Prospects’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1227-1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO: 1998, ‘Statistics on Working Children and Hazardous Child Labour in Brief’, Bureau of Statistics, Geneva.

  • Kolk, A., R. van Tulder and C. Welters: 1999, ‘International Codes of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility: Can Transnational Corporations Regulate Themselves?’, Transnational Corporations 8(1), 143-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., R. van Tulder and I. Sloekers: 2001, ‘Werken gedragscodes kinderarbeid?’, ESB 86(4295), 160-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, C. C. and B. B. Schlegelmilch: 1990, ‘Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United States’, Journal of International Business Studies 21(4), 519-539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A.: 2000, ‘Responsible Care: An Assessment’, Business and Society 39(2), 183-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Save the Children: 2000, Big Business, Small Hands-Responsible Approaches to Child Labour (The Wolsey Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. J.: 2001, ‘Ethical Codes of Conduct and Organizational Context: A Study of the Relationship Between Codes of Conduct, Employee Behavior and Organizational Values’, Journal of Business Ethics 30, 185-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulder, R. van and A. Kolk: 2001, ‘Multinationality and Corporate Ethics: Codes of Conduct in the Sporting Goods Industry’, Journal of International Business Studies 32(2), 267-283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF: The State of the World’s Children (Oxford University Press, New York).

  • Weaver, G. R.: 2001, ‘Ethics Programs in Global Businesses: Culture’s Role in Managing Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 30, 3-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolk, A., van Tulder, R. Child Labor and Multinational Conduct: A Comparison of International Business andStakeholder Codes. Journal of Business Ethics 36, 291–301 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014009313508

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014009313508

Navigation