Skip to main content
Log in

Bounded Rationality in the Economics of Organization: Present Use and (Some) Future Possibilities

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The way in which bounded rationality enterscontemporary organizational economicstheorizing is examined. It is argued that,as it is being used, bounded rationalityis not necessary for producing the results of organizationaleconomics. It is at best a rhetorical device,used for the purpose of loosely explainingincomplete contracts. However, it is possibleto incorporate much richer notions of boundedrationality, founded on research in cognitivepsychology, and to illuminate the study ofeconomic organization by means of such notions. A number of examples are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G.A.: 1991, “Procrastionation and Obedience”, American Economic Review 81: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A.: 1950, “Uncertain, Evolution, and Economic Theory”, in idem.: 1977, Economic Forces at Work (Indianapolis: Liberty Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A. and H. Demsetz: 1972, “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization”, American Economic Review 62(5): 772–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, L. and G. Loewenstein: 1997, “Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A.: 1977, Social Learning Theory (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.W.: 1992, Cognitive Psychology: An Overview for Cognitive Scientists (Hillsdale: Erlbaum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y.: 2000, “On Fallacies in Certain Theories of the Firm,”, mimeo.

  • Blackwell, D.: 1965, “Discounted Dynamic Programming”, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 36: 226–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, E. and M. Fares: 2000, “Incomplete Contracts and Governance Structures”, in Claude Ménard (ed.) (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho, A. and J.J. Persky: 1988, “The Internal Organization of Complex Teams”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 9: 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C.: 1998, “Behavioral Economics and Nonrational Organizational Decision Making”, in J.J. Halpern and R.N. Stern (eds.), Debating Rationality (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, L. and W.B. MacLeod: 1999, “Caring About Sunk Costs: A Behavioral Solution to Hold-Up Problems with Small Stakes”, University of Southern California Law School, Olin Working Paper: 99-19.

  • Carter, M.J.: 1995, “Information and the Division of Labour: Implications for the Firm's Choice of Organization”, Economic Journal 105: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H.: 1984, “The New Institutitonal Economics”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 140: 229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlisk, J.: 1996, “Why Bounded Rationality?”, Journal of Economic Literature 34: 669–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N.: 2001a. “Simon's Grand Theme in the Theory of Economic Organization,” Journal of Management and Governance (this issue).

  • Foss, N.: 2001b. “The Problem With Bounded Rationality: On Behavioral Assumptions in the Theory of the Firm,” paper presented at the DRUID conference in Honor of Sidney Winter and Richard Nelson, Aalborg, Denmark, 6-8 June, 2001.

  • Foss, K. and N. Foss: 2000, “Theoretical Isolation in Contract Theory: Suppressing Margins and Entrepreneurship”, Journal of Economic Methodology 7.

  • Foss, K. and N. Foss: 2001, “Assets, Attributes and Ownership”, International Journal of the Economics of Business 8: 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn, E.: 1999, “Economic Efficiency in a World of Frictions”, European Journal of Law and Economics 8: 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn, E.: 2001, “The New Institutional Economics and the Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (forthcoming).

  • Furubotn, E. and R. Richter: 1997, Institutions and Economic Theory (Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, S.: 1999, “Limited Attention and the Optimal Incompleteness of Contracts”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15: 468–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A.: 2001, Organizations and Economic Behavior (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. and O. Hart: 1986, “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Lateral and Vertical Integration”, Journal of Political Economy 94: 691–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.R. and J.G. March: 1984, “Decision Making and Postdecision Surprises”, Administrative Science Quarterly 29: 26–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O.: 1990, “Is ‘Bounded Rationality’ an Important Element of a Theory of Institutions?”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 146: 696–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O.: 1995, Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. and J. Moore: 1990, “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm”, Journal of Political Economy 98: 1119–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. and J. Moore: 1999, “Foundations of Incomplete Contracts”, Review of Economic Studies 66: 115–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., M. Knez and C. Camerer: 1993: “The Strategic Management of the Entitlement Process in the Employment Relationship”, Strategic Management Journal 14: 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B. and P. Milgrom: 1994, “The Firm as an Incentive System”, American Economic Review 84: 972–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B. and J. Tirole: 1989, “The Theory of the Firm”, in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Organization (Amsterdam: North Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L.: 1972, Victims of Groupthink (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and K. Wruck: 1994, “Science, Specific Knowledge and Total Quality Management”, in M.C. Jensen: 1998, Foundations of Organizational Strategy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., J.L. Knetsch and R.H. Thaler: 1990, “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem”, Journal of Political Economy 98: 1325–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., R.G. Crawford and A.A. Alchian: 1978, “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process”, Journal of Law and Economics 21: 297–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M.: 1996, “Markets and Hierarchies and (Mathematical) Economic Theory”, Industrial and Corporate Change 5: 561–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1970, “Falsificationism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in idem.: 1978, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D., F. Malerba, R. Maxfield and L. Orsenigo: 1996, “Choice and Action”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 6: 43–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latsis, S.: 1972, “Situational Determinism in Economics”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23: 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latsis, S. (ed.): 1976a., Method and Appraisal in Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latsis, S. (ed.): 1976b. “The Limitations of Single-Exit Models: Reply to Machlup,” British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 27: 51–78.

  • Lazear, E.P.: 1991, “Labor Economics and the Psychology of Organizations,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.: 1990, “Homo Socio-Oeconomicus: The Emergence of a General Model of Man in the Social Sciences”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 146: 727–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B.J.: 1971, “Hypothesis and Paradigm in the Theory of the Firm”, Economic Journal 81: 863–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J.: 1995, “Running a Business: An Appraisal of ‘Economics, Organization and Management’”, Industrial and Corporate Change 4: 471–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F.: 1967, “Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial”, in idem.: 1978, Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, W.B.: 2000, “Complexity and Contract”, Revue d'Économie Industrielle 92: 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G.: 1996, “Learning to Be Risk Averse”, Psychological Review 10: 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G.: 1999, The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Z. Shapira: 1992, “Variable Risk Preferences and the Focus of Attentions”, Psychological Review 99: 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J. and R. Radner: 1972, The Theory of Teams (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E. and J. Tirole: 1999a, “Unforeseen Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts”, Review of Economic Studies 66: 83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E. and J. Tirole: 1999b, “Two Remarks on the Property Rights Literature”, Review of Economic Studies 66: 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts: 1988, “Economic Theories of the Firm: Past, Present and Future”, in N.J. Foss: 2000, The Theory of the Firm, Vol. 1 (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts: 1990, “Bargaining Costs, Influence Costs, and the Organization of Economic Activity”, in J. E. Alt and K. Shepsle (eds.), Perspectives on Positive Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts: 1992, Economics, Organization, and Management (Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjee, S.: 1998, “Ambiguity Aversion and Incompleteness of Contractual Form”, American Economic Review 88: 1207–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.: 1992, “Comment”, in L. Werin and L. Wijkander (eds.), Contract Economics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, L.J.: 1996, Management and Organizational Behavior (London: Pitman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter: 1973, “Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Economic Capabilities”, American Economic Review 63: 440–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J.W.: 1993, “The Scarecrow's Search: A Cognitive Pyschologist's Perspective on Organizational Decision-Making”, in Z. Shapira (ed.), Organizational Decision-Making (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.T.: 1952, “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm”, American Economic Review 42: 804–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M. and M. Shanley: 1997, “Social Learning and the ‘Fundamental Paradox’ of Transaction Cost Economics”, Advances in Strategic Management 14: 193–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R.: 1993, “Ronald Coase and Methodology”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postrel, S. and R.P. Rumelt: 1992, “Incentives, Routines, and Self-Command”, Industrial and Corporate Change 1: 397–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M.: 1998, “Psychology and Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature 36: 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R.: 1996, “Bounded Rationality, Indeterminacy, and the Theory of the Firm”, Economic Journal 106: 1360–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A.: 1998, Modeling Bounded Rationality (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R.K. and J.E. Stiglitz: 1985, “Human Fallibility and Economic Organization”, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 75: 292–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, I.: 1999, “Complexity and Renegotiation: A Foundation for Incomplete Contracts”, Review of Economic Studies 66: 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlicht, E.: 1990, “Rationality, Bounded or Not, and Institutional Analysis”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Analysis 146: 703–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Z.: 2000, “Governance in Creative Organizations: A Cognitive Perspective”, forthcoming in Journal of Management and Governance.

  • Simon, H.A.: 1955, “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1976, “From Substantive to Procedural Rationality”, in Spiro Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1979, “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations”, American Economic Review 69: 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C.: 1999, “Cognition and Cost-Benefit Analysis”, John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper No. 85, University of Chicago.

  • Tirole, J.: 1999, “Implicit Contracts: Where Do We Stand?”, Econometrica 67: 741–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1987, “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions”, in R.M. Hogarth and M. Reder (eds.), Rational Choice: the Contrast Between Economics and Psychology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1971, “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations”, American Economic Review 61: 112–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1979, “Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations”, Journal of Law and Economics 22: 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1993, “Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization,” Journal of Law and Economics 36: 453–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1996, The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1998, “Human Actors and Economic Organization”, Paper for the 1998 Paris ISNIE Conference.

  • Witt, U.: 1996, “Bounded Rationality, Social Learning, and Viable Moral Conduct in a Prisoner's Dilemma”, in E. Helmstädter and M. Perlman (eds.), Behavioral Norms, Technological Progress and Economic Dynamics: Studies in Schumpeterian Economics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenger, T. and W.S. Hesterly: 1997, “The Disaggregation of Corporations: Selective Intervention, High-Powered Incentives, and Molecular Units”, Organization Science 8: 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foss, N.J. Bounded Rationality in the Economics of Organization: Present Use and (Some) Future Possibilities. Journal of Management & Governance 5, 401–425 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014007330294

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014007330294

Keywords

Navigation