Abstract
In periodic flows near walls transport effects may be considerably larger than in a steady turbulent boundary layer. The question explored in this contribution is, therefore, whether providing separate transport equations for each of the Reynolds stresses consequently leads to a better modelling of a periodic flow's evolution than an eddy viscosity scheme whose constitutive equation is inherently linked to the generation and dissipation terms being in balance (local equilibrium). Our conclusion is that, while a stress-transport scheme is indeed better equipped to reproduce the phenomena, it does not consistently out-perform the EVM over the range of flows studied. In some cases it is suggested that more attention must be paid to modelling diffusive transport in order to secure the benefits of second-moment closure. To illustrate sensitivity to diffusive transport, two different diffusion models are tested, one of which leads to different effective transport coefficients in each stress component.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cotton, M., Craft, T., Guy, A. et al. On Modelling Periodic Motion with Turbulence Closures. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 67, 143–158 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014002326410
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014002326410