Skip to main content
Log in

Macroeconomic Performance and Wage Bargaining in a Monetary Union

  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building on a micro-founded model of a two-region monetary union, this paperanalyses the macroeconomic impact of institutional reforms in labour marketsand central banking that may occur as a result of monetary unification. Thepaper shows that monopoly distortions in the labour market are a key factorin evaluating the effects of central bank's conservativeness and wagecentralisation on inflation and unemployment. Wage restraint is favoured ina highly decentralised wage bargaining setup as well as under a liberalcentral bank, provided competition is high in the labour market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R. and Gordon, D. (1983) ‘A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural Rate Model', Journal of Political Economy 91, 589–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, H., Eijffinger, S., and de Haan, J. (2001) ‘Central Bank's Independence: An Update of Theory and Evidence', Journal of Economic Surveys 15, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors, L. (2001) ‘Wages and Wage Bargaining Institutions in EMU: A Survey', Empirica (this issue).

  • Calmfors, L. and Driffill, J. (1988) ‘Bargaining Structure, Corporativism and Macroeconomic Performance', Economic Policy 6, 14–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallari, L. (2001a) ‘Inflation and Openness with Non-atomistic Wage-setters', Scottish Journal of Political Economy 48, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallari, L. (2001b) ‘Inflationary Performance in a Monetary Union with Large Wage-setters', mimeo, University of Rome I.

  • Cubitt, R.P. (1992) ‘Monetary Policy Games and Private Sector Precommitment, Oxford Economic Papers 44, 513–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubitt, R.P. (1995) ‘Corporativism, Monetary Policy and Macroeconomic Performance: A Simple Game Theoretic Analysis', Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97, 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coricelli, F., Cukierman, A., and Dalmazzo, A. (2000) ‘Monetary Institutions, Monopolistic Competition, Unionized Labor Markets and Economic Performance', CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2407.

  • Cukierman, A. and Lippi, F. (1999) ‘Central Bank Independence, Centralisation of Wage Bargaining, Inflation and Unemployment: Theory and Some Evidence', European Economic Review 43, 1395–1434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A. and Lippi, F. (2001) ‘Labour Markets and Monetary Union: A Strategic Analysis', The Economic Journal 473, 541–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A., Rodriguez, P., and Webb, S. (1998) ‘Central Bank Autonomy and Exchange Rate Regimes: Their Effects Upon Monetary Accommodation and Activism', in S. Eijffinger and H. Huizinga, eds., Positive Political Economy: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK and NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüner and Hefeker (1999) ‘How Will EMU Affect Inflation and Unemployment in Europe', Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101, 1, 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Franzese, R. (1998) ‘Mixed Signals: Central Bank Independence, Coordinated Wage Bargaining and European Monetary Union', International Organization 52(3), 505–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S. (1999) ‘Monetary Regimes and the Coordination of Wage Setting', mimeo, University of Oslo.

  • Kydland, F. and Prescott, E. (1977) ‘Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans', Journal of Political Economy 85, 473–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.R. (2001) ‘The New Open Economy Macroeconomics: a Survey', Journal of International Economics (forthcoming).

  • Lawler, P., (2000) ‘Centralised Wage Setting, Inflation Contracts and the Optimal Choice of Central Banker', The Economic Journal 110(463), 559–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippi, F. (2000) ‘Revisiting the Case for a Populist Central Banker', European Economic Review (forthcoming).

  • Obstfeld, M. and Rogoff, K. (1996) Foundations of International Macroeconomics, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A. (1982) ‘The Microeconomic Theory of the Trade Union', The Economic Journal 92, 576–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piga, G. (2000) ‘Dependent and Accountable: Evidence from the Modern Theory of Central Banking', Journal of Economic Surveys 14, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rama, M. (1994) ‘Bargaining Structure and Economic Performance in the Open Economy', European Economic Review 38, 403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1985a) ‘Can InternationalMonetary Policy Cooperation be Counterproductive?', Journal of International Economics 18, 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1985b) ‘The Optimal Degree of Commitment to a Monetary Target', Quarterly Journal of Economics 100, 1169–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skott, P. (1997) ‘Stagflationary Consequences of Prudent Monetary Policy in a Unionized Economy’, Oxford Economic Papers 49, 36–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D. and Iversen, T. (1998) ‘Multiple Wage-bargaining Systems in the Single European Currency Area', Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14(3), 110–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D. and Iversen, T. (2000) ‘The Non-neutrality of Monetary Policy with Large Price orWage Setters', Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasco, A. and Guzzo, V. (1999) ‘The Case for a Populist Central Banker', European Economic Review 43, 1317–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zervoyanni, A. (1997) ‘Monetary Policy Games and Coalitions in a Two-country Model with Unionized Wage-setting’, Oxford Economic Papers 49, 57–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cavallari, L. Macroeconomic Performance and Wage Bargaining in a Monetary Union. Empirica 28, 419–433 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013996219173

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013996219173

Navigation