Skip to main content
Log in

Enabling BPR in Maintenance Through a Performance Measurement System Framework

  • Published:
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With ever-increasing importance, plant maintenance is no more regarded as second line or non-productive activity. It is about time maintenance received due attention from various business improvement initiatives such as total quality management or business process reengineering (BPR). This paper builds on previous work by the authors that examines the role of performance measurement systems (PMS) in maintenance, with particular reference to developing a new PMS framework using the quality function deployment (QFD) technique. In the light of the fact that there is only limited evidence of BPR applications pertinent to equipment maintenance, this paper explores the use of the PMS framework to enable and guide sound BPR endeavors in maintenance. Condensed literature on BPR is presented followed by an outline of the PMS framework. The benefits of utilizing such a framework are examined with reference to BPR in maintenance. The practical implications of the findings are discussed based on a case study conducted in a local company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, P. K. and Simintiras, A. C., “Conceptualizing Business Process Re-engineering,” Business Process Reengineering & Management Journal, Vol. 2, No.2, pp. 73–92 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashein, B. J., Markus, M. L., and Riley, P., “Preconditions for BPR Success and How to Prevent Failures,” Information Systems Management, Vol. 11, No.2, pp. 7–13 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belmiro, T. R., Gardiner, P. D., and Simmons J. E. L., “Business Process Re-engineering—A Discredited Vocabulary?” International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 17, No.1, pp. 21–33 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicheno, J., The Quality 50: A Guide to Gurus, Tools, Wastes, Techniques and Systems, PICSIE Books, Buckingham (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. G., Hitchcock, D. E., and Willard, M. L., Why TQM Fails? Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H., “Reliance on Manufacturing Performance Measures, Total Quality Management and Organizational Performance,” Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, pp. 187–206 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, C. F. and Chan, S. L., “Business Process Re-engineering: Evocation, Elucidation and Exploration,” Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 39–63 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, J. L., Maintenance, Maintenance Publishers Ltd., Hatfield (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson-Thomas, C. J., “Reengineering in Practice,” The Financial Times Handbook of Management: The State of the Art, S. Crainer (Ed.), FT Pitman Publishing, London, pp. 245–258 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupello, J. M., “A New Paradigm for Measuring TQM Progress,” Quality Progress, Vol. 27, No.5, pp. 79–82 (May 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. and Stoddard, D. B., “Reengineering: Business Change of Mythic Proportions?” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No.2, pp. 121–127 (June 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI, SME Statistics for the UK, Small Firms Statistical Unit, Sheffield, UK (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, M., “How New Is Business Process Engineering?” European Management Journal, Vol. 12, No.1, pp. 20–30 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., Thomasson, B., and Ovretveit, J., Quality of Service, McGraw-Hill, London (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • EUREKA, “European Benchmark Study on Maintenance,” Brussels (1993).

  • Evans, J. R. and Lindsay, W. M., The Management and Control of Quality, West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, N., Management Masterclass, Nicholas Brealey Publishing Ltd., London (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K., “Reengineering History,” Organization, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 179–202 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V., Jeong, S., Kettinger, W., and Teng, J., “The Implementation of business Process Reengineering,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, No.1, pp. 109–144 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V., Seung, R. J., and Teng, J. T. C., “Survey of Reengineering Challenges,” Information Systems Management, Vol. 15, pp. 53–59 (Spring 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., “ReengineeringWork: Don't Automate, Obliterate,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 104–112 (July–August 1990).

  • Hammer, M. and Champy, J., Reengineering the Corporation, Harper Business, New York (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E., Successfully Installing TPM in a Non-Japanese Plant, TPM Press, Allison Park, PA (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder, R., “Major Payoffs for Rover and LMP as TPM Proves Itself,” Works Management, Vol. 49, No.8, pp. 16–17 (August 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husband, T. M., Maintenance Management & Terotechnology, Gower Publishing Company Ltd., Hampshire (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P., “The Balance Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 71–79 (January–February 1992).

  • Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P., “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 75–84 (January–February 1996).

  • Kelly, A., “Maintenance and its Management,” Conference Communication (1989).

  • Klein, M. M., “Re-Engineering Methodologies and Tools, A Prescription for Enhancing Success,” Information Systems Management, pp. 30–35 (Spring 1994).

  • Kutucuoglu, K. Y., Hamali, J., Sharp, J. M., and Irani, Z., “A Framework for Managing Maintenance Using Performance Measurement Systems,” International Journal of Operations & Productions Management (1999).

  • Light, B. and Holland, C. P., “The Influence of Legacy Information Systems upon Business Process Reengineering Strategies,” BIT 98, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggard, B. N. and Rhyne, D. M., “Total Productive Maintenance: A Timely Integration of Production and Maintenance,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, pp. 6–11 (Fourth Quarter 1992).

  • March Group Report, “Managing Maintenance in the 1990s,” March Consulting Group Report No. 3, London (1988).

  • Marsh, J., The Quality Toolkit, IFS Ltd., UK (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, R. and O'Hare, C., “An Improved BPR Approach for Offline Enabling Processes,” Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 4, No.3, pp. 226–240 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meekings, A., “Unlocking the Potential of Performance Measurement: A Practical Implementation Guide,” Public Money & Management, pp. 5–12 (October–December 1995).

  • Morgan, C., “TQM & BPR Compared,” Examining Business Process Reengineering—Current Perspectives and Research Directions, G. Burke and J. Peppard (Eds.), The Cranfield Management Series, Kogan Page, London (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, H. R., The Deming Dimension, SPC Press Inc., Knoxville, TN (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newitt D. J. H., “Beyond BPR & TQM—Managing Through Processes: Is Kaizen Enough?” IEE Colloquium (Digest), No. 125, pp. 3/1–3/5 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, J. S., Total Quality Management: Text with Cases, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovretveit, J., Measuring Service Quality, Technical Communication (Publishing) Ltd., Hertfordshire (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehanich, M., “Behind the Lines,” Prepared Foods, Vol. 164, No.12, p. 87 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummler, G. A. and Brache, A. P., Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsion, G.C., “A Methodology for Business Process Re-Engineering,” IFIP Transactions A—Computer Science and Technology, Part A-54, pp. 61–69 (1994).

  • Sinclair, D. and Zairi, M., “Performance Measurement as an Obstacle to TQM,” The TQM Magazine, Vol. 7, No.3, pp. 42–62 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, D. and Zairi, M., “Assessing the Effectiveness of Performance Measurement Systems: A Case Study,” Total Quality Management, Vol. 7, No.4, pp. 367–378 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiker, B. K. and Lesser, E., “We Have Met the Enemy,” Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 16, No.2 (1995).

  • Valentine, R. and Knights, D., “TQM and BPR—Can You Spot the Difference,” Personnel Review, Vol. 27, No.1, pp. 78–85 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weight, T., “Business Process Reengineering from a Deming Viewpoint,” Paper presented at the 1994 Annual Conference of the British Deming Association on behalf of the BDA Alliance of Consultants (1994).

  • White, G. P., “A Survey and Taxonomy of Strategy-Related Performance Measures of Manufacturing”, International Journal of Operations & Productions Management, Vol. 16, No.3, pp. 42–62 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, P., Total Productive Maintenance: The Western Way, Butterworth–Heinemann Ltd., Oxford (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wireman, T., World Class Maintenance Management, Industrial Press, New York, NY (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kutucuoglu, K.Y., Hamali, J., Sharp, J.M. et al. Enabling BPR in Maintenance Through a Performance Measurement System Framework. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 14, 33–52 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013870802492

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013870802492

Navigation