Skip to main content
Log in

Implied Volatility of Interest Rate Options: An Empirical Investigation of the Market Model

  • Published:
Review of Derivatives Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze the empirical properties of the volatilityimplied in options on the 13-week US Treasury bill rate. These options havenot been studied previously. It is shown that a European style put optionon the interest rate is equivalent to a call option on a zero-coupon bond.We apply the LIBOR market model and conduct a battery of validity tests tocompare three different volatility specifications: contact, affine, and exponentialvolatility. It appears that the additional parameter in the affine and theexponential volatility function is not justified. Overall, the LIBOR marketmodel fares well in describing these options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin, K. I., and A. J. Morton. (1994). “Implied Volatility Functions in Arbitrage-Free Term Structure Models,” Journal of Financial Economics 35, 141–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, K. I., and V. K. Ng. (1997). “Inferring Future Volatility from the Information in Implied Volatility in Eurodollar Options: A New Approach,” Review of Financial Studies 10,2, 333–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, L., and J. Andreasen. (2000). “Volatility Skews and Extensions of the LIBOR Market Model,” Applied Mathematical Finance 7,1.

  • Black, F. (1976). “The Pricing of Commodity Contracts,” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., and M. Scholes. (1973). “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy 81 (May/June), 637–654.

  • Bliss, R. R., and E. I. Ronn. (1998). “Callable U.S. Treasury Bonds: Optimal Calls, Anomalies, and Implied Volatility,” Journal of Business 71,2, 211–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T., and J. M. Wooldridge. (1992). “Quasi:maximum Likelihood Estimation Dynamic Models with Time Varying Covariances,” Econometric Reviews 11, 143–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, A., D. Gatarek, and M. Musiela. (1997). “The Market Model of Interest Rate Dynamics,” Mathematical Finance 7,2, 127–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canina, L. and S. Figlewski. (1993). “The Informational Content of Implied Volatility,” The Review of Financial Studies 6, 659–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiras, D. P., and S. Manaster. (1978). “The Information Content of Prices and a Test of Market Efficiency,” Journal of Financial Economics 6, 213–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, B. J., and N. R. Prabhala. (1998). “The Relation Between Implied and Realized Volatility,” Journal of Financial Economics 50, 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, T. E., and C. M. Lewis. (1988). “The Behavior of the Volatility Implicit in the Prices of Stock Index Options,” Journal of Financial Economics 22, 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, T. E., and C. M. Lewis. (1992). “Stock Market Volatility and the Information Content of Stock Index Options,” Journal of Econometrics 52, 267–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, F., J. Driessen, and A. Pelsser. (1999). LIBOR and Swap Market Models for the Pricing of Interest Rate Derivatives: An Empirical Comparison, Working Paper, University of Amsterdam.

  • Dumas, B., J. Fleming, and R. E. Whaley. (1998). “Implied Volatility Functions: Empirical Tests,” The Journal of Finance 6, 2059–2106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P. H. (1997). “Bond and Bond Option Pricing Based on the Current Term Structure.” In Mathematics of Derivative Securities, M. A. H. Dempster and S. R. Pliska, (eds.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–293.

  • Heath, D., R. Jarrow, and A. Morton. (1992). “Bond Pricing and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: A New Methodology for Contingent Claims Valuation,” Econometrica 60, 77–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidian, F. (1997). “LIBOR and Swap Market Models and Measures,” Finance and Stochastics 1, 293–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow, R. A. (1996). Modelling Fixed Income Securities and Interest Rate Options, McGraw-Hill.

  • Lamoureux, C. G., and W. D. Lastrapes. (1993). “Forecasting Stock-Return Variance: Toward an Understanding of Stochastic Implied Volatilities,” Review of Financial Studies 6,2, 293–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, H. A., and R. J. Rendleman. (1976). “Standard Deviations of Stock Price Ratios Implied in Option Prices,” The Journal of Finance 31,2, 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miltersen, K. R., K. Sandmann, and D. Sondermann. (1997). “Closed Form Solutions for Term Structure Derivatives with Log-Normal Interest Rates,” Journal of Finance 52,1, 409–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraleda, J. M., and T. C. F. Vorst. (1997). “Pricing American Interest Rate Claims with Humped Volatility Models,” Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 1131–1157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musiela, M., and M. Rutkowski. (1998). Martingale Methods in Financial Modelling, Springer.

  • Whaley, R. (1982). “Valuation of American Call Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks,” Journal of Financial Economics 10, 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christiansen, C., Strunk Hansen, C. Implied Volatility of Interest Rate Options: An Empirical Investigation of the Market Model. Review of Derivatives Research 5, 51–80 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013860216764

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013860216764

Navigation