Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Globalization, The State and Public Administration: A Theoretical Analysis with Policy Implications for Developmental States

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the relationship between globalization, the state, and public administration, with implications for developmental states. Using a political economy analysis, globalization is discussed as the latest dynamic change in the context of the continuity within the process of surplus accumulation by corporate capitalism at the global level, a phenomenon with far reaching implications for the modern state, governance, and public administration. First, the context of change and continuity is briefly discussed, followed by a presentation of several theoretical perspectives on, and meanings of, globalization as defined by different people from different disciplines. Then, the causes and consequences of globalization are discussed with implications for the state and public administration. Finally, a number of policy choices are suggested in response to globalization by developmental states, with another discussion on the changing character and role of the state under globalization with implications for the state and public administration worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron, Henry. Ralph Bryant, Susan Collins, and Robert Lawrence. (1995). “Preface to the Studies on Integrating National Economies.'' In Vito Tanzi (ed.), Taxation in an Integrating World. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, VI–XXIV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, George. (1967). “Cosmocorporations: The Importance of Being Stateless.'' Columbia Journal of World Business.

  • Boyer, Robert and Daniel Drache, eds. (1996). States Against Markets: The Limits of Globalization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, Jeremy and Tim Costello. (1994). Global Village or Global Pillage: Economic Reconstruction from the Bottom Up. Boston, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Seyom. (1992). International Relations in a Changing Global System: Toward a Theory of World Polity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1982). The Turning Point. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cern, Philip G. (1995). “Globalization and the Changing Logic of Collective Action.'' International Organization 64(Autumn), 595–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Anthony Bing-Leung. (2000). “Globalization, Governance and Asian Values: Can There Be a Universal Administrative paradigm?.'' Paper presented at the International Conference on Public Management and Governance in the New Millennium: Lessons From the past and Challenges for the Future held at the City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, January 10-11, 2000.

  • Cottam, Richard. (1979). “Goodbye to America's Shah.'' Foreign Policy, 3–14.

  • Cox, R. W. (1993). “Structural Issues of Global Governance.'' In S. Gill (ed.), Gramci. Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 259–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, Joseph. (1995). The New Social Contract: America's Journey from Welfare State to Police State. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • During, Alan. (1992). How Much is Enough: The Consumer Society and the Future of the Earth. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edstrom, A. and J. Galbraith. (1977). “Transfer of Managers as Coordination of and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations.'' Administrative Science Quarterly 22, 248–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, Peter. (1995). The State in the American Political Economy. Englewood: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, Daniel. (1994). Greening the GATT: Trade. Environment, and the Future. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Richard. (1995). On Humane Governance: Towards a New Global Politics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Richard. (1997). “States of Siege: Will Globalization Win Out?'' International Affairs 73 (January).

  • Farazmand, Ali. (1989). The State, Bureaucracy, and Revolution: Agrarian Reform and Regime Politics in Modern Iran. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (1994). “The New World Order and Global Public Administration: A Critical Essay.'' In Garcia-Zamor, Jean-Claude and Khator Renu (eds.), Public Administration in the Global Village. Westport, CT: Praeger, 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (1997a). “From Civil to Non-civil Administration: The Biggest Challenge to the State and Public Administration.'' Paper presented at the national conference of the American society for public administration, Philadelphia, July.

  • Farazmand, Ali. (1997b). “Institutionalization of the New Administrative State/Role Under Globalization.'' Paper presented at the annual conference of the American political science review, Washington, DC, August 28-31.

  • Farazmand, Ali. (1997c). Modem Systems of Government. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (1999a). “Globalization and Public Administration.'' Public Administration Review 59(6), 509–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (1999b). “Privatization Or Reform? Public Enterprise Management in Transition.'' International Review of Administrative Sciences, December, 65(4): 551–567.

  • Farazmand, Ali. (1999c). “Building Partnerships for Governance: Sharing Power and Responsibility,'' Background Paper Prepared for the UN and Presented at the Plenary Session on Partnership Building at the UN Organized World Congress on Governance, Manila, June 1-5.

  • Farazmand, Ali. (1999d). “The Elite Question: Toward a Normative, Elite Theory of Organization.'' Administration & Society 31(3)/July, 322–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (2000a). “Ethics and Accountability Problems Under Globalization and Privatization,'' paper presented at the World Congress of the International Political Science Association (IPSA), Quebec, Canada, August 1-6.

  • Farazmand, Ali. (2000b). Privatization and Public Enterprise Reform: Implications for Public Management. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (2001a). “Globalization and Privatization: Challenges to the Governance and Management of Giant Cities and Communities.'' Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), Newark, NJ, March 2001.

  • Farazmand, Ali. (2001b). “Globalization and Privatization: A theoretical Analysis with Implications for Governance and Public Management Education and Training,'' Public Finance and Management, also presented at the Annual Conference of the International Association of Schools and Institutes of Administration (IASIA), Athens, Greece, July 7-14, 2001.

  • Farazmand, Ali. (2001c). Administrative Reform in Developing Nations. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (2002). Emergent Theories of Organization: An Overview and Analysis. In Ali Farazmand (ed.) Modern Organizations: Theory and Practice. Wesport, CT. Praeger, 2nd Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (forthcoming). The New American Administrative State: Institutionalization and Globalization.

  • Frank, Thomas. (2002). One Market Under God. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, George. (1997). The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidman, Thomas. (1999). The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Farrar, Straus, Girous.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen and Law David. (1991). The Global Political Economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graycar, A. (1983). Retreat from the Welfare State. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. (1974). “The Public Sphere.'' New Government Critique 3, 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, Fred. (1979). Iran: Dictatorship and Development. New York: Penguin Books, 2nd Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankock, John. (1989). Lords of Poverty. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, R. (1995). The Return of the Strong: The Drift to Global Disorder. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, Ferrel. (1998). “Comparative and International Public Administration: Building Intellectual Bridges.'' Public Administration Review 58(1), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner, Robert (1991). An Inquiry Into the Human Prospect. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. and G. Thompson. (1996). Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julius, Deanne. (1997). “Globalization and Stakeholder Conflicts: a corporate perspective'', International Affairs, 76(3): 453–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert and Joseph Nye. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, Jan. (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Relations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korbin, Stephen. (1996). “Back to the Future: Neomedievalism and the Postmodern Digital World Economy.'' Journal of International Affairs 51(2), 367–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, David. (1995). When Corporations Rule the World. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, David. (1999). The Post-corporate World: Life After Capitalism. Kumarian Press.

  • Krasner, Stephen. (1993). “Economic Interdependence and the Independent Statehood.'' In R. H. Jackson and A. James (eds.), States in a Chanaing World: A Contemporary Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kregel, Jan. (1998). “The Strong Arm of the IMF.'' Report of the Jerome Levy Economic Institute of Bard College 8(1), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudrle, Robert, (1999). “Three Types of Globalization: Communication, Market, and Direct.'' In Raimo Vayrynen (ed.), Globalization and Global Governance. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazlo, E. (1977). Goals for Mankind: A Report to the Club of Rome. NY: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazlo, E. (1987). Evolution: The Grand Synthesis. Boston: Shambhala New Science Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles. (1977). Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economy Systems. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles. (1990). Inquiry and Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, Michael. (1984). “Bureaucratic Disentitlement in Social Welfare Programs.'' Social Service Review 58(1), 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Theodore. (1996). The End of the Republican Era. Norman, OK: University of Oaklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loye, David and Riane Eisler. (1987). “Chaos and Transformation: Implications of Nonequilibrium Theory for Social Science and Society.'' Behavioral Sciences 32, 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C. B. (1987). The Rise and Fall of Economic Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, Ernest. (1999). Late Capitalism. London, New York: VERSO. Trans. by Joris De Bres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander, Jerry and Edward Goldsmith, eds. (1996). The Case Against the Global Economy and for A Return Toward Local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. (1980). States, War and Capitalis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, Christopher (1996). “Globalization, Culture, and Neighborhood Change: Reinventing the Lower East Side of New York.'' Urban Affairs Review 32(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, Brinton. (1994). “Nonprofit Contracting and the Hollow State: A Book Review.'' Public Administration Review 54(1), 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingst, Karen. (1999). “Global Governance: The American Perspective.'' In Raimo Vayrynen (ed.), Globalization and Global Governance. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modelski, George, ed. (1979). Transnational Corporations and the World Order. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Company.

  • Mueller, Dennis. (1989). Public Choices II. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Richard. (1988). Protecting the U.S. Interests in the [Persian] Gulf. Washington, DC: National Council on U.S.-Arab Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naisbitt, John. (1994). The Global Paradox: The Bigger the World Economy the More Powerful its Smallest Players. London: Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1985). Disorganized Capitalism. Cambrdige, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, Kenichi. (1990). The Borderless World. London: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, Michael. (1995). Democracy for the Few. New York: St. Martin's press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Guy (1994). “Reorganization and Reform: A Theoretical Analysis.'' In Ali Farazmand (ed.), Modern Organizations: Administrative Theory in Contemporary Society. Westport, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, S. (1991). “The Internationalization of the State.'' Capital & Class 43,Spring, 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (1991). The Workof Nations: Preparing for 21st Century Capitalism. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, Jeremy. (1996). The End of Work. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, Frederick. (1998). “Public Administration in America: Why Our Uniqueness is Exceptional and Important.'' Public Administration Review 58(1), 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothknopf, David. (1998). “Cyberpolitik: The Changing Nature of Power in The Information Age.'' Journal of International Affairs 51(2), 325–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Alfred A. Knoph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salk, J. (1983). The Anatomy of Reality. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (1997). “Global Capitalism and The State.'' International Affairs 73(3), 427–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, I. (1995). Sociology of The Global System. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheef.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. (1985). “Bringing the State Back in: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.'' In Peter B. Evan, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol (eds.), Bringing The State Back In. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. (1996). The Retreat of The State: Diffusion of Power in The World Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy, Paul. (1997). “More (or less) on Globalization.'' Monthly Review. 49(4), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, Harry. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuanthail, Gearoid, Andrew Herod and Susan Roberts. (1997). “Negotiating Unruly Problematics.'' In Herod, Roberts and Tuathail (eds.), An Unruly World: Globalization. Governance, and Geography. New York: Routledge, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at Bay. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo, Dwight. (1980). The Enterprise of Public Administration. Navota, CA: Chandler & Sharp Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth. (1999). “Globalization and Governance.'' Ps: Political Science & Politics XXXII 4, December, 693–700.

  • Weber, Max. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by A. M. Henderson and Tolcott Parsons. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettenhall, Roger (2000). “Public and Private in the NPMC (New Public Management) State.'' Paper presented at the International Conference on Public Management and Governance in the New Millennium: Lessons from the Past and Challenges for the Future, City University of Hong Kong. January 10-11.

  • Wilson, David. (1994). “Bureaucracy in International Organizations: Building Capacity and Credibility in A Newly Interdependent World.'' In Ali Farazmand (ed.), Handbookof Bureaucracy. New York: Marcel Dekker, 305–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zysman, J. (1996). “The Myth of A 'Global' Economy: Enduring National Foundations and Emerging Regional Realities.'' New Political Economy 1, July, 157–184.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farazmand, A. Globalization, The State and Public Administration: A Theoretical Analysis with Policy Implications for Developmental States. Public Organization Review 1, 437–463 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013787932072

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013787932072

Navigation