Abstract
In this paper we refer to a machine learning method that reveals all the if–then rules in the data, and on the basis of these rules issues predictions for new cases. When issuing predictions this method faces the problem of choosing from competing theories. We dealt with this problem by calculating the probability that the rule is accidental. The lower this probability, the more the rule can be `trusted' when issuing predictions. The method was tested empirically and found to be accurate. On a broader scope this approach demonstrates how the dialog between researchers in machine learning and the philosophy of science can be beneficial for both sides.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, R., Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H. and Verkamo, A.I. (1996), 'Fast Discovery of Association Rules', in Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/AAAI Press.
Domingos, P. (1998), Occams's Two Razors: The Sharp and the Blunt, in Agrawal, R., Stolorz, P. and Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., eds., Proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, AAAI Press.
Gillies, D. (1996), Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Method, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glymour, C. (1998), AI is Philosophy, in Fetzer J., ed., Aspects of AI, D. Reidel.
Howson, C. and Urbach, F. (1989), Scientific Inference: The Bayesian Approach, Open Court.
Hume David (1739–40), A Treatise of Human Nature; L. A. Selby-Bigge, ed., revised P. H. Nidditch (1978), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liu, B., Hsu, W. and Ma, Y. (1988), Integrating Classification and Association Rule Mining, in Agrawal, R., Stolorz, P. and Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., eds., Proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, AAAI Press.
Mitchel, M. T. (1997), Machine Learning, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pollock, J. (1983), Epistemology and Probability, Synthese 55, pp. 231–252.
Russell, S. (1991), Inductive Learning by Machines, Philosophical Studies 64, pp. 37–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meidan, A., Levin, B. Choosing from Competing Theories in Computerised Learning. Minds and Machines 12, 119–129 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013748128879
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013748128879