Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New Public Management: Public Policymaking Dilemmas: Balancing between Administrative Capacity, Control and Democratic Governance

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Caiden, Gerald E. (1988). “The Problem of Ensuring the Public Accountability of Public Officials.'' In J. G. Jabbra and O. P. Dwivedi (eds.), Public Service Accountability. West Hartford, Conn.: Kumarian Press, pp. 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Steven and William Eimicke. (1998). Tools for Innovators. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobel, Patrick J. (2001). “Paradigms, Traditions, and Keeping the Faith.'' Public Administration Review 61(2), 166–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, Larkin. (1997). “New Insights into Old Theories: Contracting Relationships and the Separation of Powers.'' Journal ofHealth and Human Services Administration 20, 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Richard T. (1998). “Hamiltonian Public Administration.'' In Jay M. Shafritz (ed.), International Encyclopedia ofPublic Policy and Administration. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1039–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halachmi, Arie and Marc Holzer. (1993). Towards a Competitive Public Administration. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, Marc and Kathe Callahan. (1999). Government at Work: Best Practices and Model Programs. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, Richard C. and Steven W. Hays. (Fall 1998). “Reinventing Government, The New Public Management and Civil Service Systems in International Perspective.'' Review ofPublic Personnel Administration 18(4), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettl, Donald F. (1993). Sharing Power. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettl, Donald F. and John Dilulio, Jr., eds. (1995). Inside the Reinvention Machine: Appraising Governmental Reform. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, Laurence E. (2001). “The Myth of the Bureaucratic Paradigm: What Traditional Public Administration Really Stood For.'' Public Administration Review 61(2), 144–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Catherine. (1997). “Government, Funded Nonprofits, and Accountability.'' Nonprofit Management and Leadership 8(1), 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, Ronald C. (1994). “The “Reinventing Government'' Exercise: Misinterpreting the Problem, Misjudging the Consequences.'' Public Administration Review 54(2), 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, Ronald C. and Robert S. Gilmour. (1995). “Rediscovering Principles of Public Administration: The Neglected Foundation of Public Law.'' Public Administration Review 55(2), 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, David and Ted Gabler. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott J. Steven, Pitima Boonyarak, and Lisa A. Dicke. (2001, in press). “Public Sector Reform, and Moral and Ethical Accountability: Performance Measurement Technology Cannot Ensure Accountability for Contracted Human Services.'' Public Integrity 3(3).

  • Ott J. Steven and Lisa A. Dicke. (2001, in press). “Challenges Facing Public Sector Management in an Era of Downsizing, Devolution, Diffusion, Empowerment...and Accountability?'' Public Organization Review.

  • Peters B. Guy. (1996). The Future ofGoverning: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence, Kans.: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riccucci, Norma M. (2001). “The Old Public Management Versus the New Public Management: Where Does Public Administration Fit In?'' Public Administration Review 61(2), 172–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, David H.(2001). “History Lessons for Reinventors.'' Public Administration Review 61(2), 161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, Lester M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government-nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan H. J. (1987). “Privatization of Public Services: A Growing Threat to Constitutional Rights.'' Public Administration Review 47(6), 461–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svara, James H. (2001). “The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarily of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration.'' Public Administration Review 61(2), 176–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, Larry D. (1999). “From Greek Mythology to the Real World of the New Public Management and Democratic Governance (Terry Responds).'' Public Administration Review 59(3), 272–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zifcak, Spencer. (1994). New Managerialism: Administrative Reform in White Hall and Canberra. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. J. Steven Ott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pitima Boonyarak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ott, J.S., Boonyarak, P. New Public Management: Public Policymaking Dilemmas: Balancing between Administrative Capacity, Control and Democratic Governance. Public Organization Review 1, 487–492 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013744117051

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013744117051

Search

Navigation