Skip to main content
Log in

Enclosure Smoke Filling and Management with Mechanical Ventilation

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enclosure smoke filling and management are addressed from the standpoint of the volumetric flow rates commonly used for mechanical ventilation system design. In this context, fire-induced gas expansion is treated as a volumetric source term. A two-layer analysis developed previously for enclosure smoke filling without mechanical ventilation is extended to consider the impact of mechanical ventilation on smoke layer descent rates and conditions within the smoke layer. A spreadsheet-based model of enclosure smoke filling developed in conjunction with the previous unventilated analysis is also extended to consider both mechanical extraction and injection systems. Some implications of mechanical ventilation on the development and descent of a smoke layer in an enclosure fire are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.Y. Cooper, “A Mathematical Model for Estimating Available Safe Egress Time from Fires,” Fire and Materials, vol. 6, 1982, pp. 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  2. NFPA, Guide for Smoke Management Systems in Malls, Atria, and Large Areas, NFPA 92B-1995, Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BSI, “Fire Safety Engineering in Buildings. Part 1. Guide to the Application of Fire Safety Engineering Principles” DD240: Part 1: 1997, London: British Standards Institute, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fire Code Reform Centre Limited, Fire Engineering Guidelines, Sydney, 1996.

  5. J.A. Milke, and F.W. Mowrer, “An Algorithm for the Design Analysis of Atrium Smoke Management Systems,” FP93-04, University of Maryland at College Park: Department of Fire Protection Engineering, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E.E. Zukoski, “Development of a Stratified Ceiling Layer in the Early Stages of a Closedroom Fire,” Fire and Materials, vol. 2, 1978, pp. 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.D. Walton, “ASET-B: A Room Fire Program for Personal Computers,” Fire Technology, vol. 21, 1985, pp. 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.E. Nelson, “FPETOOL: Fire Protection Engineering Tools for Hazard Estimation,” NISTIR 4380, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, October 1990, 120 p.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.W. Portier, R.D. Peacock, and P.A. Reneke, “FASTLite: Engineering Toolsfor Estimating Fire Growth and Smoke Transport,” NIST SP 899, Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standardsand Technology, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F.W. Mowrer, “Enclosure Smoke Filling Revisited,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 33, 1999, pp. 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F.W. Mowrer, “Methods of Quantitative Fire Hazard Analysis,” TR-100443, Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute, May 1992 (reprinted by the Society of Fire Protection Engineers with permission from EPRI).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L.Y. Cooper, “Compartment Fire-Generated Environment and Smoke Filling,” in SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd ed., P.J. DiNenno, Ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Tewarson, “Generation of Heat and Chemical Compounds in Fire,” in SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd ed., P.J. DiNenno, Ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H.W. Emmons, “Vent Flows,” in SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd ed., P.J. DiNenno, Ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.H. Klote, and J.A. Milke, Design of Smoke Management Systems, Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Ho, N. Siu, and G. Apostolakis, “COMPBRN III—A Fire Hazard Model for Risk Analysis,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 13, 1988, pp. 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K.L. Foote, P.J. Pagni, and N.J. Alvares, “Temperature Correlations for Forced-Ventilation Compartment Fires,” in Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the First International Symposium, 1986.

  18. C. Beyler, “Analysisof Compartment Fireswith Overhead Forced Ventilation,” in Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, 1991.

  19. C.L. Beyler, “Major SpeciesProduction by Diffusion Flamesin a Two-layer Compartment Environment,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 10, 1986, pp. 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D.T. Gottuk and R.J Roby, “Effectsof Combustion Conditionson SpeciesProduction, ” in SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd ed., P.J. DiNenno, Ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Huggett, “Estimation of Rate of Heat Release by Means of Oxygen Consumption Measurements,” Fire and Materials, vol. 6, 1980, pp. 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Janssens, “Calorimetry,” in SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd ed., P.J. DiNenno, Ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E.E. Zukoski, S.J. Toner, J.H. Morehart, and T. Kubota, “Combustion Processes in Two-Layered Configurations,” in Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the Second International Symposium, 1988, pp. 295–304.

  24. J.H. Morehart, E.E. Zukoski, and T. Kubota, “Characteristics of Large Diffusion Flames Burning in a Vitiated Atmosphere,” in Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, 1991, pp. 575–583.

  25. E.E. Zukoski, T. Kubota, and B. Cetegen, “Entrainment in Fire Plumes,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 3, 1980/81, pp. 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C.L. Beyler, “'Fire Plumesand Ceiling Jets,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 11, no.53, 1986, pp. 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.G. Quintiere, and B.S. Grove, “Correlationsfor Fire Plumes,” NIST GCR 98-744, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1998, 207 p.

    Google Scholar 

  28. P.S. Ziesler, F.S. Gunnerson, and S.K. Williams, “Advances in Positive Pressure Ventilation: Live Fire Tests and Laboratory Simulation” Fire Technology, vol. 30, no.2, 1994, pp. 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S.P. Nowlen, “Enclosure Environment Characterization Testing for the Base Line Validation of Compute Fire Simulation Codes,” NUREGCR-5681, SAND86-1296, Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Professional Loss Control, “Fire Induced Vulnerability Evaluation (FIVE),” TR-100370, Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute, April 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  31. F.W. Mowrer, and B. Gautier, “Comparison of Fire Model Features and Computations,” in 14thP ost-SMIRT Conference Proceedings, Lyons, France, 1997.

  32. R. Alpert and E. Ward, “Evaluation of Unsprinklered Fire Hazards,” Fire Safefy Journal, vol. 7, 1984, pp. 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M.A. Delichatsios, “The Flow of Fire Gases Under a Beamed Ceiling,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 43, no.1, 1981.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mowrer, F.W. Enclosure Smoke Filling and Management with Mechanical Ventilation. Fire Technology 38, 33–56 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013476730932

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013476730932

Navigation