Skip to main content
Log in

Trade and the Transmission of Technology

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper integrates earlier studies on the link of productivity and research and development (R&D) in different industries of a closed economy with the more recent emphasis on R&D-driven growth and international trade in open economies. In this framework, technology in the form of product designs is transmitted to other industries, both domestically as well as internationally, through trade in differentiated intermediate goods. I present empirical results based on a new industry-level data set that covers more than 65 percent of the world’s manufacturing output and most of the world’s R&D expenditures between 1970 and 1991. The analysis considers productivity effects from R&D in the domestic industry itself, from R&D in other domestic industries, as well as in the same and other foreign industries. I estimate strong productivity effects both from own R&D spending and R&D conducted elsewhere. The contribution of R&D in the industry itself is about 50 percent in this sample. Domestic R&D in other industries is the source of 30 percent of the productivity increases, and the remaining 20 percent are due to R&D expenditures in foreign industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. (1992). “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction,” Econometrica 60, 323–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. (1999). “Higher-order Improvements of a Computationally Attractive k-step Bootstrap for Extremum Estimators.” Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1230, Yale University, August.

  • Branstetter, L. (2001). “Are Knowledge Spillovers International or Intranational in Scope? Micro-econometric Evidence from the U.S. and Japan,” Journal of International Economics.

  • Coe, D. T., and E. Helpman. (1995). “International R&D Spillovers,” European Economic Review 39, 859–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D. T., E. Helpman, and A. W. Hoffmaister. (1997). “North-South R&D Spillovers,” Economic Journal 107, 134–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D. T., and A. Hoffmaister. (1999). “Are There International R&D Spillovers Among Randomly Matched Trade Partners? A Response to Keller.” IMF Working Paper 99/18, February.

  • Eaton, J., and S. Kortum. (1999). “International Patenting and Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement,” International Economic Review.

  • Eaton, J., and S. Kortum. (1996). “Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD,” Journal of International Economics 40, 251–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmond, C. (2000). “Some Panel Cointegration Models of International R&D Spillovers.” Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of California at Los Angeles; Journal of Macroeconomics (forthcoming)

  • Englander, A., R. Evenson, and M. Hanazaki. (1998). “R&D, Innovation and the Total Factor Productivity Slowdown,” OECD Economic Studies 11, 7–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R., J. Putnam, and S. Kortum. (1991). Estimating Patent Counts by Industry using the Yale-Canada Concordance, Final Report to the National Science Foundation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., and M. Karayannis. (1993). “United States.” Chapter 10 in Jorgenson and Landau (1993a), pp. 333–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1995). “R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues.” In P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 52–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1992). “The Search for R&D Spillovers,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1984). R&D, Patents, and Productivity (ed.), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1979). “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth,” Bell Journal of Economics 10, 92–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., and J. Mairesse. (1998). “Production Functions: The Search for Identification.” Chapter 6 in S. Strom (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–203.

  • Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the World Economy. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E. (1990). “Invariance Properties of Solow's Productivity Residual.” In Diamond (ed.), Growth/Productivity/Employment, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 71–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, J. (1997). “Technology, Factor Supplies, and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model,” American Economic Review 87, 475–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, K., H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. (1997). “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels.” Mimeo, Cambridge University, December.

  • Jaffe, A. B. (1986). “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value,” American Economic Review 76, 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., and R. Evenson. (1997). “Innovation and Invention in Canada,” Economic Systems Research 9, 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W. (1993), “Introduction and Summary.” Chapter 1 in Jorgenson and Landau (1993a), pp. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W., and R. Landau. (1993a). Tax Reform and the Cost of Capital (eds.), Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W., and R. Landau. (1993b). “Appendix.” In Jorgenson and Landau (1993a), pp. 369–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. (2001a), “Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion.” Mimeo, University of Texas; forthcoming, American Economic Review.

  • Keller, W. (2001b), “International Technology Diffusion.” NBER Working Paper No. 8573, October.

  • Keller, W. (2000). “Do Trade Patterns and Technology Flows Affect Productivity Growth?” World Bank Economic Review 14, 17–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. (1998). “Are International R&D Spillovers Trade-related? Analyzing Spillovers Among Randomly Matched Trade Partners,” European Economic Review 42, 1469–1481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. (1996). “Absorptive Capacity: On the Creation and Acquisition of Technology in Development,” Journal of Development Economics 49, 199–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W., and P. Pedroni. (1999). “Does Trade affect Growth? Estimating R&D-Driven Models of Trade and Growth at the Industry Level.” Paper presented at the The Role of Technology Transfer in East Asian Economic Growth conference, University of California at Davis, August 1999.

  • Kortum, S., and J. Putnam. (1997). “Assigning Patents to Industries: Tests of the Yale Technology Concordance,” Economic Systems Research 9, 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, C. (1986). World Trade and Production. Methodology and Tables in ISIC. Hamburg: Verlag Weltarchiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F., and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. (1998). “International R&D Spillovers: A Comment,” European Economic Review 42, 1483–1491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumenga-Neso, O., M. Olarreaga, and M. Schiff (2001), “On ‘Indirect’ Trade-Related R&D Spillovers,” working paper, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G., and I. Kim. (1998). Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change. Cambridge University Press.

  • Mohnen, P. (1999). “International R&D Spillovers and Economic Growth.” Mimeo, Universite du Quebec a Montreal, February.

  • Nadiri, M. I. (1993). “Innovations and Technological Spillovers.” NBER Working Paper No. 4423, Cambridge, MA.

  • Nadiri, M. I., and I. R. Prucha. (1993). “Estimation of the Depreciation Rate of Physical and R&D Capital in the U.S. Total Manufacturing Sector.” NBER Working Paper No. 4591, Cambridge, MA.

  • OECD (2000). The OECD Input-Output (I/O) Database, available at http://www.oecd.org, not dated.

  • OECD (1994). STAN Database for Industrial Analysis. OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1991). Basic Science and Technology Statistics, various years, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (1999). “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors,” forthcoming, Oxford Bullet of Economics and Statistics.

  • Pedroni, P. (1997). “Panel Cointegration; Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis Test; New Restuls.” Working paper, Indiana University, April.

  • Phillips, P., and H. Moon. (1999). “Linear Regression Limit Theory for Non-stationary Panel Data,” Econometrica 67, 1057–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Batiz, L., and P. M. Romer. (1991). “Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics CVI: 531–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, F., and D. Rodrik. (2000). “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, (eds.) B. Bernanke and K. Rogoff.

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy 98, S71–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1984). “Using Linked Patent and R&D Data to Measure Interindustry Technology Flows.” In Griliches (1984), pp. 417–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terleckyj, N. E. (1974). “Effects of R&D on the Productivity Growth of Industries: An Exploratory Study.” Washington, D.C.: National Planning Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trefler, D. (1995). “The Case of the Missing Trade and other Mysteries,” American Economic Review 85, 1029–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (1994). “Benchmark input-output Accounts for the U.S. Economy, 1987,” Survey of Current Business, April.

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (1991), “Benchmark input-output Accounts for the U.S. Economy, 1982,” Survey of Current Business, July, 30–71.

  • Wolff, E. N., and M. I. Nadiri. (1993). “Spillover Effects, Linkage Structure, and Research and Development,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 4, 315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1987). World Development Report 1987. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, W. Trade and the Transmission of Technology. Journal of Economic Growth 7, 5–24 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013461025733

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013461025733

Navigation