Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

Cultural explanation and organizational crime

  • Neal Shover
  • Andy Hochstetler


Both the number and influence of organizations increased dramatically during the 20th century, which helps explain why the problem of organizational crime has received attention from investigators. Growing interest in organizational and corporate crime has been matched by interest in organizational culture. Variation in organizational culture is employed to explain many aspects of organizational performance, from effectivenessin goal attainment to criminal conduct. There are reasons, however, to be critical of theoretical constructions and empirical investigations of organizational culture. There is both considerable ambiguity about its meaning and an implicit assumption of intra-organizational cultural uniformity. Cultural explanations were developed principally in case studies, empirical analyses are flawed, and supportive post hoc interpretations ofinteresting or enigmatic findings are commonplace. The influence of hierarchy and agency as constraints on organizational culture has received insufficient attention. We interpret the appeal of organizational culture despite the absence of demonstrated predictive value, and we call for additional research on sources of variation in organizational crime.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnett, Harold C., “Industry Culture and Industry Economy: Correlates of Tax Noncompliance in Sweden” Criminology 1985 (24), 553–574.Google Scholar
  2. Baucus, Melissa S. and Terry Morehead Dworkin, “What is Corporate Crime? It is Not Illegal Corporate Behavior,” Law & Policy 1991 (13), 231–244.Google Scholar
  3. Baucus, Melissa S. and Janet P. Near, “Can Illegal Corporate Behavior be Predicted? An Event History Analysis,” Academy of Management Journal 1991 (34), 9–36.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, Trevor and Richard T. Wright, Burglars on Burglary (Hampshire, U.K.: Gower, 1984).Google Scholar
  5. Books in Print (New York: R.R. Bowker, 1997).Google Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, John, “Criminological Theory and Organizational Crime,” Justice Quarterly 1989) (6), 333–358.Google Scholar
  7. Braithwaite, John and Toni Makkai, “Testing an Expected Utility Model of Corporate Deterrence,” Law & Society Review 1991 (25), 7–40.Google Scholar
  8. Clinard, Marshall B. Corporate Ethics and Crime (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1983).Google Scholar
  9. Clinard, Marshall B. and Richard Quinney, Criminal Behavior Systems: A Typology, 2nd ed. (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973).Google Scholar
  10. Clinard, Marshall B. and Peter C. Yeager, Corporate Crime (New York: Free Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, James S., The Asymmetric Society (Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, James W., “Respectable Crime,” in Joseph F. Sheley (ed.), Criminology: A Contemporary Handbook (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1991).Google Scholar
  13. The Criminal Elite, 4th ed. (New York: St. Martin's, 1998).Google Scholar
  14. Cressey, Donald R., “Poverty of Theory in Corporate Crime Research,” in Gilbert Geis, Robert F. Meier, and Lawrence M. Salinger (eds.), White-Collar Crime: Classic and Contemporary Views, 3rd ed. (New York: Free Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  15. Czarniawska-Joerges, Barbara, Exploring Complex Organizations: A Cultural Perspective (Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 1992).Google Scholar
  16. Deal, Terrence E. and Allan A. Kennedy, Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1982).Google Scholar
  17. Denzin, Norman, “Notes on the Criminogenic Hypothesis: A Case Study of the American Liquor Industry,” American Sociological Review 1977 (42), 905–920.Google Scholar
  18. Feeney, Floyd, “Robbers as Decision Makers,” in Derek B. Cornish and Ronald V. Clarke (eds.), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986).Google Scholar
  19. Fine, Gary Alan, “Negotiated Orders and Organizational Cultures,” Annual Review of Sociology 1984 (10), 239–262.Google Scholar
  20. Frederick, William C., “An Ethics Roundtable: The Culprit is Culture,” Management Review 1988 (77), 48–50.Google Scholar
  21. Values, Nature and Culture in theAmerican Corporation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  22. Geis, Gilbert, “White-collar Crime: The Heavy Electrical Equipment Antitrust Cases of 1961,” in Marshall B. Clinard and Richard Quinney (eds.), Criminal Behavior Systems: A Typology (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1967).Google Scholar
  23. Granovetter, Mark, “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology 1985 (91), 481–510.Google Scholar
  24. Gregory, Kathleen L., “Native View Paradigms: Multiple Cultures and Culture Conflicts in Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly 1983 (28), 359–376.Google Scholar
  25. Hambrick, Donald C. and Phyllis A. Mason, “Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers,” Academy of Management Review 1984 (9), 193–206.Google Scholar
  26. Hills, Stuart L., “Epilogue: Corporate Violence and the Banality of Evil,” in Stuart L. Hills (ed.), Corporate Violence (Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1987).Google Scholar
  27. Hofstede, Geert, Bram Neuijen, Denise Daval Ohayv, and Geert Sanders, “Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study across Twenty Cases,” Administrative Science Quarterly 1990 (35), 286–316.Google Scholar
  28. Jaques, Elliot, The Changing Culture of a Factory (London: Tavistock, 1951).Google Scholar
  29. Kagan, Robert A. and John T. Scholz, “The ‘Criminology of the Corporation’ and Regulatory Enforcement Strategies,” in Keith Hawkins and John M. Thomas (eds.), Enforcing Regulation (Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1984).Google Scholar
  30. Katz, Jack, Seductions of Crime: Moral and Sensual Attractions in Doing Evil (New York: Basic Books, 1988).Google Scholar
  31. Kilmann, Ralph H., Mary J. Saxton and Roy Serpa (eds.). Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985).Google Scholar
  32. Kotter, John P. and James L. Heskett, Corporate Culture and Performance (New York: Free Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  33. Lee, Matthew T. and M. David Ermann, “Pinto, ‘Madness’ as a Flawed Landmark Narrative: An Organizational and Network Analysis,” Social Problems 1999 (46), 30–47.Google Scholar
  34. Lorsch, Jay W., “Strategic Myopia: Culture as an Invisible Barrier to Change,” in Ralph H. Kilmann, Mary J. Saxton and Roy Serpa (eds.), Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985).Google Scholar
  35. Los Angeles Times, “Army's Sex Convictions: Now the Larger Questions,” 1997 (April 30), B8.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, Joanne, Cultures in Organizations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  37. Martin, Joanne and Caren Siehl, “Organizational Culture and Counterculture: An Uneasy Symbiosis,” Organizational Dynamics 1983 (12), 52–64.Google Scholar
  38. Messerschmidt, James W., “Managing to Kill:Masculinities and the Space Shuttle Challenger Explosion,” in Cliff Cheng (ed.), Masculinities in Organizations (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1996).Google Scholar
  39. Newsweek, “Anchors Aweigh,” 1996 (February 5), 69–71.Google Scholar
  40. New York Times, “U.S. Fines 500 Mine Companies for False Air Tests,” 1991 (April 5), A12.Google Scholar
  41. Ibid., “Navy Settles a Fraud Case on Stanford Research Costs,” 1994 (October 19), A16. Ibid., “At Big Kidney Chain, Deals for Doctors, Ruins for Rivals,” 1995 (December 5), A1.Google Scholar
  42. Ott, J. Steven, The Organizational Culture Perspective (Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1989).Google Scholar
  43. Paternoster, Raymond and Sally Simpson, “A Rational Choice Theory of Corporate Crime,” in Ronald V. Clarke and Marcus Felson (eds.), Routine Activity and Rational Choice (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 1993).Google Scholar
  44. Pearce, Frank, “Corporate Rationality as Corporate Crime,” Studies in Political Economy 1993 (40), 135–162.Google Scholar
  45. Peters, Thomas J. and Robert H. Waterman, Jr., In Search of Excellence (New York: Harper and Row, 1982).Google Scholar
  46. Pettigrew, Andrew M., “On Studying Organizational Cultures,” Administrative Science Quarterly 1979 (24), 570–581.Google Scholar
  47. Pugh, Derek L. and David J. Hickson, Writers on Organizations, 5th ed. (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997).Google Scholar
  48. Reichers, Arnon E. and Benjamin Schneider, “Climate and Culture: An Evolution of Constructs,” in Benjamin Schneider (ed.), Organizational Climate and Culture (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990).Google Scholar
  49. Rousseau, Denise M., “Assessing Organizational Culture: The Case for Multiple Methods,” in Benjamin Schneider (ed.), Organizational Climate and Culture (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990).Google Scholar
  50. Sackman, Sonja A., “Culture and Subcultures: An Analysis of Organizational Knowledge,” Administrative Science Quarterly 1992 (37), 140–161.Google Scholar
  51. Sathe, Victor, Culture and Related Corporate Realities (Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1985).Google Scholar
  52. Scott, Marvin B. and Stanford M. Lyman, “Accounts,” American Sociological Review 1968 (33), 46–61.Google Scholar
  53. Scott, W. Richard, Rational, Natural and Open Systems, 3rd ed. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1992).Google Scholar
  54. Shapiro, Susan P., “The New Moral Entrepreneurs: Corporate Crime Crusaders,” Contemporary Sociology 1983 (12), 304–307.Google Scholar
  55. Shover, Neal, “White-collar Crime,” in Michael Tonry (ed.), Handbook of Crime and Punishment (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  56. Shover, Neal and Kevin M. Bryant, “Theoretical Explanations of Corporate Crime,” in Michael Blankenship (ed.), Understanding Corporate Criminality (New York: Garland, 1993).Google Scholar
  57. Shover, Neal and David Honaker, “The Socially Bounded Decision Making of Persistent Property Offenders,” Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 1992 (31), 276–293.Google Scholar
  58. Simpson, Sally S. and Christopher S. Koper, “Deterring Corporate Crime,” Criminology 1992 (30), 347–375.Google Scholar
  59. Skolnick, Jerome and James J. Fyfe, Abve the Law: Police and the Excessive Use of Force (New York: Free Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  60. Sonnenfeld, Jeffrey and Paul R. Lawrence, “Why Do Companies Succumb to Price Fixing?,” Harvard Business Review 1978 (56), 145–157.Google Scholar
  61. Smirich, Linda, “Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly 1983 (28), 339–358.Google Scholar
  62. Sutherland, Edwin H., White Collar Crime: The Uncut Version (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  63. Sykes, Gresham and David Matza, “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency,” American Sociological Review 1957 (22), 667–670.Google Scholar
  64. Szwajkowski, Eugene, “The Myths and Realities of Research on Organizational Misconduct,” in J.E. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 8. (New York: JAI, 1986).Google Scholar
  65. Tonry, Michael and Albert J. Reiss, Jr. (eds.), Beyond the Law: Crime in Complex Organizations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  66. Trice, Harrison M., Occupational Subcultures in the Workplace (Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  67. Tunnell, Kenneth D., Choosing Crime (Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1992).Google Scholar
  68. U.S. Department of Commerce, Statistical Abstract of the U.S. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1996).Google Scholar
  69. Vaughan, Diane, The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  70. Ibid., “The Dark Side of Organizations: Mistake, Misconduct, and Disaster,” Annual Review of Sociology 1999 (25), 271–305.Google Scholar
  71. Wall Street Journal, “A No Contest Plea by Chem-Bio Averts Trial over Pap Smear,” 1995 (December 5), B-6.Google Scholar
  72. Washington Post, “Virginia Dairy Charged with Price Fixing,” 1991 (July 31), D6.Google Scholar
  73. Wilson, James Q., Thinking About Crime (New York: Basic Books, 1975).Google Scholar
  74. Wright, Richard T. and Scott H. Decker, Burglars on the Job: Streetlife and Residential Breakins (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  75. Ibid., Armed Robbers in Action: Stick-up and Street Culture (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  76. Yank, Hiyol (ed.), Business Periodicals Index (New York: H.W.Wilson, 1997).Google Scholar
  77. Yeager, Peter C., “Analyzing Corporate Offenses: Progress and Prospects,” in J.E. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 8. (New York: JAI, 1986).Google Scholar
  78. Zimring, Franklin E. and Gordon Hawkins, “Crime, Justice, and the Savings and Loan Crisis,” in Michael Tonry and Albert J. Reiss, Jr. (eds.), Beyond the Law: Crime in Complex Organizations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neal Shover
    • 1
  • Andy Hochstetler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleU.S.A
  2. 2.Iowa State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations