Genetica

, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 9–32 | Cite as

The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution

  • Stevan J. Arnold
  • Michael E. Pfrender
  • Adam G. Jones
Article

Abstract

An adaptive landscape concept outlined by G.G. Simpson constitutes the major conceptual bridge between the fields of micro- and macroevolutionary study. Despite some important theoretical extensions since 1944, this conceptual bridge has been ignored in many empirical studies. In this article, we review the status of theoretical work and emphasize the importance of models for peak movement. Although much theoretical work has been devoted to evolution on stationary, unchanging landscapes, an important new development is a focus on the evolution of the landscape itself. We also sketch an agenda of empirical issues that is inspired by theoretical developments.

adaptive landscape macroevolution microevolution phenotypic evolution quantitative genetics selection surface selective line of least resistance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, S.J., 1988. Quantitative genetics and selection in natural populations: microevolution of vertebral numbers in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans, pp. 619–636 in Proc. 2nd Intern. Conf. Quantitative Genetics, edited by B.S. Weir, E.J. Eisen, M.M. Goodman & G. Namkoong. Sinauer, Sunderland, M.A.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, S.J., 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140: S85–S107.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, S.J., 1994. Multivariate inheritance and evolution: a review of the concepts, pp. 17–48 in Quantitative Genetic Studies of the Evolution of Behavior, edited by C.R.P. Boake. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, S.J. & A.F. Bennett, 1988. Behavioral variation in natural populations. V. Morphological correlates of locomotion in the garter snake Thamnophis radix. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 34: 175–190.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, S.J. & P.C. Phillips, 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. II. Coastal-inland divergence in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 53: 1516–1527.Google Scholar
  6. Badyaev, A.V. & G.E. Hill, 2000. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the house finch. I. Population divergence on morphological covariance structure. Evolution 54: 1784–1794.Google Scholar
  7. Barton, N.H. & M. Turelli, 1987. Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genet. Res. 49: 157–173.Google Scholar
  8. Brodie, E.D. III, 1992. Correlational selection for color pattern and antipredator behavior in the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Evolution 47: 1284–1298.Google Scholar
  9. Brodie, E.D. III, A.J. Moore & F.J. Janzen, 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 313–318.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, J.S. & T.L. Vincent, 1992. Organization of predator-prey communities as an evolutionary game. Evolution 46: 1269–1283.Google Scholar
  11. Bull, J.J., 1987. Evolution of phenotypic variance. Evolution 41: 303–315.Google Scholar
  12. Charlesworth, B., 1993a. The evolution of sex and recombination in a varying environment. J. Hered. 84: 345–350.Google Scholar
  13. Charlesworth, B., 1993b. Directional selection and the evolution of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. 61: 205–224.Google Scholar
  14. Charlesworth, B., R. Lande & M. Slatkin, 1982. A neo-Darwinian commentary on macroevolution. Evolution 36: 474–498.Google Scholar
  15. Cheverud, J.M., 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J. Theor. Biol. 110: 155–171.Google Scholar
  16. Curtsinger, J.W., 1984a., Evolutionary landscapes for complex selection. Evolution 38: 359–367.Google Scholar
  17. Curtsinger, J.W., 1984b. Evolutionary principles for polynomial models of frequency-dependent selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81: 2840–2842.Google Scholar
  18. Dawkins, R., 1996. Climbing Mount Improbable. W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Dudley, S.A., 1996. The response to differing selection on plant physiological traits: evidence for local adaptation. Evolution 50: 103–110.Google Scholar
  20. Eldredge, N., 1999. The Pattern of Evolution. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York.Google Scholar
  21. Eldredge, N. & J. Cracraft, 1980. Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. Columbia University Press, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  22. Emerson, S.B. & S.J. Arnold, 1989. Intra-and interspecific relationships between morphology, performance, and fitness, pp. 295–314 in Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution, edited by D.B. Wake & G. Roth. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.Google Scholar
  23. Endler, J.A., 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  24. Ewens, W.J., 1979. Mathematical Population Genetics. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Feder, J.F., 1998. The apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella: flies in the face of conventional wisdom, pp. 130–144 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D.J. Howard & S.H. Berlocher. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Felsenstein, J., 1973. Maximum likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25: 471–492.Google Scholar
  27. Felsenstein, J., 1979. Excursions along the interface between disruptive and stabilizing selection. Genetics 93: 773–795.Google Scholar
  28. Felsenstein, J., 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1–15.Google Scholar
  29. Felsenstein, J., 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 445–471.Google Scholar
  30. Flury, B., 1988. Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models. Wiley, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  31. Garcia-Ramos, G. & M. Kirkpatrick, 1997. Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51: 21–28.Google Scholar
  32. Gavrilets, S., 1997. Evolution and speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 307–312.Google Scholar
  33. Gould, S.J., 1997. Self-help for a hedgehog stuck on a molehill. Evolution 51: 1020–1023.Google Scholar
  34. Gould, S.J. & N. Eldredge, 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiol. 3: 115–151.Google Scholar
  35. Hansen, T.F. & E.P. Martins, 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50: 1404–1417.Google Scholar
  36. Hansen, T.F., 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51: 1341–1351.Google Scholar
  37. Hendry, A.P. & M.T. Kinnison, 1999. The pace of modern life: measuring rates of microevolution. Evolution 53: 1637–1653.Google Scholar
  38. Hendry, A.P., J.K. Wenburg, P. Bentzen, E. C. Volk & T. P. Quinn, 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290: 516–518.Google Scholar
  39. Hendry, A.P., T. Day & E. B. Taylor, 2001. Population mixing and the adaptive divergence of quantitative characters in discrete populations: a theoretical framework for empirical tests. Evolution 55: 459–466.Google Scholar
  40. Janzen, F.J. & H.S. Stern, 1998. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52: 1564–1571.Google Scholar
  41. Karn, M.L. & L.S. Penrose, 1951. Birth weight and gestation time in relation to maternal age, parity, and infant survival. Ann. Eugenics 16: 147–164.Google Scholar
  42. Kimura, M., 1965. Attainment of quasi-linkage equilibrium when gene frequencies are changing by natural selection. Genetics 52: 875–890.Google Scholar
  43. Kingsolver, J.G., H.E. Hoekstra, J.M. Hoeskstra, D. Berrigan, S.N. Vignieri, C.E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gilbert & P. Beerli, 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245–261.Google Scholar
  44. Kirkpatrick, M., 1982. Quantum evolution and punctuated equilibrium in continuous genetic characters. Am. Nat. 119: 833–848.Google Scholar
  45. Kurtén, B., 1959. Rates of evolution in fossil mammals. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 24: 205–215.Google Scholar
  46. Lande, R., 1976a. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30: 314–334.Google Scholar
  47. Lande, R., 1976b. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet. Res. 26: 221–235.Google Scholar
  48. Lande, R., 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain-body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402–416.Google Scholar
  49. Lande, R., 1980a. Microevolution in relation to macroevolution. Paleobiol. 6: 233–238.Google Scholar
  50. Lande, R., 1980b. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292–305.Google Scholar
  51. Lande, R., 1980c. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutation. Genetics 94: 203–215.Google Scholar
  52. Lande, R., 1981. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics 99: 541–553.Google Scholar
  53. Lande, R., 1986. The dynamics of peak shifts and the pattern of morphological evolution. Paleobiol. 12: 343–354.Google Scholar
  54. Lande, R., 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455–1460.Google Scholar
  55. Lande, R. & S.J. Arnold, 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210–1226.Google Scholar
  56. Lande, R. & S. Shannon, 1996. The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment. Evolution 50: 434–437.Google Scholar
  57. Lewontin, R.C., 1958. A general method for investigating the equilibrium of gene frequencies in a population. Genetics 43: 419–434.Google Scholar
  58. Lynch, M., 1990. The rate of morphological evolution in mammals from the standpoint of neutral expectation. Am. Nat. 136: 727–741.Google Scholar
  59. Lynch, M. & R. Lande, 1993. Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change, pp. 234–250 in Biotic Interactions and Global Change, edited by P. Kareiva, J.G. Kingsolver & R.B. Huey. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  60. Martins, E.P. & T.F. Hansen, 1996. A microevolutionary link between phylogenies and comparative data, pp. 273–288 in New Uses of New Phylogenies, edited by P.H. Harvey, A.J. Leigh Brown, J. Maynard Smith & S. Nee. Oxford University Press, Oxford,U.K.Google Scholar
  61. Mather, K., 1941. Variation and selection of polygenic characters. J. Genetics 41: 159–193.Google Scholar
  62. Partridge, L., 1978. Habitat selection, pp. 351–376in Behavioral Ecology, edited by J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  63. Pfrender, M., 1998. Evolutionary dynamics of molecular and quantitative genetic variation in ephemeral pond populations of Daphnia pulex. Thesis Dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.Google Scholar
  64. Phillips, P.C. & S.J. Arnold, 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43: 1209–1222.Google Scholar
  65. Phillips, P.C. & S.J. Arnold, 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53: 1506–1515.Google Scholar
  66. Phillips, P.C., M.C. Whitlock & K. Fowler, 2001. Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158: 1137–1145.Google Scholar
  67. Price, T.D., P.R. Grant & P.T. Boag, 1984. Genetic changes in the morphological differentiation of Darwin' ground finches, pp. 49–66 in Population Biology and Evolution, edited by K Wohrmann & V. Loeschske. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  68. Provine, W.B., 1986. Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, I.L.Google Scholar
  69. Rensch, B., 1959. Evolution Above the Species Level. Wiley, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  70. Reznick, D.N. & C.K. Ghalambor, 2001. The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112–113: 183–198.Google Scholar
  71. Reznick, D.N., F.H. Shaw, F.H. Rodd & R.G. Shaw, 1997. Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275: 1934–1937.Google Scholar
  72. Rieseberg, L.H., M.A. Archer & R.K. Wayne, 1999. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83: 363–372.Google Scholar
  73. Rice, S.H., 1998. The evolution of canalization and the breaking of von Baer' laws: modeling the evolution of development with epistasis. Evolution 52: 647–656.Google Scholar
  74. Roff, D.A., 2000. The evolution of the G matrix: selection or drift? Heredity 84: 135–142.Google Scholar
  75. Rundle, H.D. & M.C. Whitlock, 2001. A genetic interpretation of ecologically dependent isolation. Evolution 55: 198–201.Google Scholar
  76. Schluter, D., 1984. Morphological and phylogenetic relations among the Darwin' finches. Evolution 38: 921–930.Google Scholar
  77. Schluter, D., 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849–861.Google Scholar
  78. Schluter, D., 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50: 1766–1774.Google Scholar
  79. Schluter, D. & D. Nychka, 1994. Exploring fitness surfaces. Am. Nat. 143: 597–616.Google Scholar
  80. Schluter, D., 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  81. Schmalhausen, I.I., 1949. Factors of Evolution, The Theory of Stabilizing Selection. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, I.L.Google Scholar
  82. Shaw, F.H., R.G. Shaw, G.S. Wilkinson & M.H. Turelli, 1995. Changes in genetic variances and covariances: G whiz! Evolution 49: 1260–1267.Google Scholar
  83. Simpson, G.G., 1944. Tempo and Mode in Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  84. Simpson, G.G., 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  85. Sinervo, B., P. Doughty, R.B. Huey & K. Zamudio, 1992. Allometric engineering: a causal analysis of natural selection on offspring size. Science 258: 1927–1930.Google Scholar
  86. Slatkin, M. & R. Lande, 1976. Niche width in a fluctuating environment - density independent model. Am. Nat. 110: 31–55.Google Scholar
  87. Stanley, S.M., 1979. Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  88. Steppan, S.J., 1997a. Phylogenetic analysis of phenotypic covariance structure. I. Contrasting results from matrix correlation and common principal component analyses. Evolution 51: 571–586.Google Scholar
  89. Steppan, S.J., 1997b. Phylogenetic analysis of phenotypic covariance structure. II. Reconstructing matrix evolution. Evolution 51: 587–594.Google Scholar
  90. Svensson, E. & B. Sinervo, 2000. Experimental excursions on adaptive landscapes: density-dependent selection on egg size. Evolution 54: 1396–1403.Google Scholar
  91. Thompson, J.N., 1998. Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 329–332.Google Scholar
  92. Turelli, M., 1988. Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances, and the maintenance of additive variance. Evolution 42: 1342–1347.Google Scholar
  93. Via, S., 1991. The genetic structure of host plant adaptation in a spatial patchwork: demographic variability among reciprocally transplanted pea aphid clones. Evolution 45: 827–852.Google Scholar
  94. Vrba, E.S., 1983. Macroevolutionary trends: new perspectives on the roles of adaptation and incidental effect. Science 221: 387–389.Google Scholar
  95. Waddington, C.H., 1957. The Strategy of the Genes. MacMillan, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  96. Williams, G.C., 1992. Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  97. Willis, J.H., J.A. Coyne & M. Kirkpatrick, 1991. Can one predict the evolution of quantitative characters without genetics? Evolution 45: 441–444.Google Scholar
  98. Whitlock, M.C., 1995. Variance-induced peak shifts. Evolution 49: 252–259.Google Scholar
  99. Whitlock, M.C. & P. C. Phillips, 2000. The exquisite corpse: a shifting view of the shifting balance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 347–348.Google Scholar
  100. Whitlock, M.C., P.C. Phillips, F.B.-G. Moore & S.J. Tonsor, 1995. Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 601–629.Google Scholar
  101. Wright, S., 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159.Google Scholar
  102. Wright, S., 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. Proc. VI Inter. Congr. Genet. 1: 356–366.Google Scholar
  103. Wright, S., 1940. The statistical consequences of Mendelian heredity in relation to speciation, pp. 161–183 in The New Systematics, edited by J.S. Huxley. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  104. Wright, S., 1945. Tempo and mode in evolution: a critical review. Ecology 26: 415–419.Google Scholar
  105. Wright, S., 1955. Classification of the factors of evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20: 16–24.Google Scholar
  106. Wright, S., 1968. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 1. Genetic and Biometric Foundations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, I.L.Google Scholar
  107. Wright, S., 1969. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, I.L.Google Scholar
  108. Wright, S., 1982. Character change, speciation, and the higher taxa. Evolution 36: 427–443.Google Scholar
  109. Zeng, Z.-B., 1988. Long-term correlated response, interpopulation covariance, and interspecific allometry. Evolution 42: 363–374.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stevan J. Arnold
    • 1
  • Michael E. Pfrender
    • 2
  • Adam G. Jones
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations