Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 183–197

Linear Programming Models for the Measurement of Environmental Performance of Firms—Concepts and Empirical Results

  • Daniel Tyteca


I use linear programming models to define standardised, aggregate environmental performance indicators for firms. The best practice frontier obtained corresponds to decision making units showing the best environmental behaviour. Results are obtained with data from U.S. fossil fuel-fired electric utilities, starting from four alternative models, among which are three linear programming models that differ in the way they account for undesirable outputs (pollutants) and resources used as inputs. The results indicate important discrepancies in the rankings obtained by the four models. Rather than contradictory, these results are interpreted as giving different, complementary kinds of information, that should all be taken into account by public decision-makers.

Linear programming environmental performance measurement fossil fuel-fired electric utilities 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Azzone, Giovanni and Raffaella Manzini. (1994). “Measuring Strategic Environmental Performance.” Business Strategy and the Environment 3(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, V. Eldon, C. A. Knox Lovell, Richard F. Nehring, and Agapi Somwaru. (1994). “Incorporating Undesirable Outputs into Models of Production: An Application to U.S. Agriculture.” Cahiers d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales 31, 60–74.Google Scholar
  3. Callens, Isabelle and Daniel Tyteca. (1995). “Towards Indicators of Sustainable Development for Firms—Concepts and Definitions.” Communication to the Fourth International Research Conference of the Greening of Industry Network, “Learning to Build Sustainable Industries for Sustainable Societies,” Toronto, Ontario, Canada, November 12–14, 1995, Submitted.Google Scholar
  4. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444.Google Scholar
  5. Connier, Denis, Michel Magnan, and Bernard Morard. (1993). “The Impact of Corporate Pollution on Market Valuation: Some Empirical Evidence.” Ecological Economics 8, 135–155.Google Scholar
  6. Devuyst, Dimitri. (1993). “Environmental Impact Assessment.” In B. Nath, L. Hens, and D. Devuyst (eds.), Environmental Management, Vol. 3: Instruments for Implementation. Brussels: VUB Press, chap. 6, 145–175.Google Scholar
  7. EIA-U.S. Energy Information Administration. (1993). Electric plant cost and power production expenses 1991. DOE/EIA-0455(91), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Färe, Rolf. (1992). “Productivity Gauging with Undesirable Outputs.” Mimeo, Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  9. Färe, Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf, C. A. Knox Lovell, and Carl A. Pasurka, Jr. (1989). “Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: a Nonparametric Approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics 71, 90–98.Google Scholar
  10. Färe, Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf, C. A. Knox Lovell, and Suthathip Yaisawarng. (1993). “Derivation of Shadow Prices for Undesirable Outputs: A Distance Function Approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics 75, 374–380.Google Scholar
  11. Färe, Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf, and Daniel Tyteca. (1996). “An Activity Analysis Model of the Environmental Performance of Firms—Application to Fossil Fuel-fired Electric Utilities.” Ecological Economics 18, 161–175.Google Scholar
  12. Haynes, Kingslcy E., Samuel Ratick, and James Cummings-Saxton. (1994). “Toward a Pollution Abatement Monitoring Policy: Measurements, Model Mechanics and Data Requirements.” Environmental Professional 16, 292–303.Google Scholar
  13. Jaggi, Bikki and Martin Freedman. (1992). “An Examination of the Impact of Pollution Performace on Economic and Market Performance: Pulp and Paper Firms.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 19, 697–713.Google Scholar
  14. James, Peter. (1994). “Business Environmental Performance Measurement.” Business Strategy and the Environment 3(2), 59–67.Google Scholar
  15. James, Peter and Martin Bennett. (1994). “Environment-Related Performance Measurement in Business—From Emissions to Profit and Sustainability?” Research Report AMRG 946, Ashridge Management Research Group, Herts (U.K.).Google Scholar
  16. Kirkpatrick, Neil. (1993). “Selecting a Waste Management Option Using a Life Cycle Analysis Approach.” Packaging Technology and Science 6, 159–172.Google Scholar
  17. Lovell, C. A. Knox. (1993). “Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency.” In Harold O. Fried, C. A. Knox Lovell, and Shelton S. Schmidt (eds.). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 3–67.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, Paul, David Wheeler, Mala Hettige, and Ralph Stengren. (1991). “The Industrial Pollution Projection System: Concept, Initial Development and Critical Assessment.” World Bank, Discussion paper, October 1991.Google Scholar
  19. Nestor, Deborah Vaughn and Carl A. Pasurka, Jr. (1993). “Measuring Progress in Pollution Prevention Using Frontier Production Functions: A Preliminary Assessment.” Discussion paper, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Pearce, David W. and Giles D. Atkinson. (1993). “Capital Theory and the Measurement of Sustainable Development: An Indicator of ‘Weak’ Sustainability.” Ecological Economics 8, 103–108.Google Scholar
  21. Rice, Faye. (1993). “Who Scores Best on the Environment.” Fortune July 26, 114–122.Google Scholar
  22. Seiford, Lawrence M. and Robert M. Thrall. (1990). “Recent Developments in DEA—The Mathematical Programming Approach to Frontier Analysis.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 7–38.Google Scholar
  23. Thiry, Bernard and Henry Tulkens. (1992). “Allowing for Inefficiency in Parametric Estimation of Production Functions for Urban Transit Firms.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 45–65.Google Scholar
  24. Tulkens, Henry. (1993). “On FDH Efficiency Analysis: Some Methodological Issues and Applications to Retail Banking, Courts, and Urban Transit.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 183–210.Google Scholar
  25. Tyteca, Daniel. (1996). “On the Measurement of Environmental Performance in Firms—A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective.” Journal of Environmental Management, 46, 281–308.Google Scholar
  26. Wehrmeyer, Walter (1993). “The Scientific Measurement of Environmental Performance.” Paper presented to ESRC workshop on Environmental Performance Measurement and Reporting, University of Wolverhampton (U.K.), 25 August 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Tyteca
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut d'Administration et de GestionUniversité Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations