Skip to main content
Log in

F. A. Hayek: The Liberal as Communitarian

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the heart of Friedrich A. Hayek's social philosophy is a regard for the socially-constituted nature of man: the individual is not taken to be asocial or pre-social, but rather it is recognized that society defines the individual. The neglect of this aspect of Hayek's work by both liberal and communitarian, as well as libertarian, writers within political philosophy has led to his position being misrepresented, for Hayek's brand of liberalism is more akin to one variant of modern communitarianism than it is to the libertarian strain of liberal thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agassi, Joseph (1960) “Methodological Individualism.” The British Journal of Sociology, 11: 244-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoist, Alain de (1998) “Hayek: A Critique,” Telos 29: 71-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy (1997) A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Edmund (1790 [1986]) Reflections on the Revolution in France. With an Introduction by O'Brien Conor Cruise (ed.) Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cladis, Mark S. (1992) A Communitarian Defense of Liberalism: Emile Durkheim and Contemporary Social Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John (1999) Individualism, Old and New. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile (1893 [1997]) The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by Halls W. D. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile (1973) On Morality and Society. With an Introduction by Bellah, Robert N. (ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser, Edward (1997) “Hayek on Social Justice: Reply to Lukes and Johnston.” Critical Review, 11: 581-626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleetwood, Steve (1995) Hayek's Political Economy: The Socio-Economics of Order. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleetwood, Steve (1997) “Critical Realism: Marx and Hayek.” In Keizer, Willem, Tieben, Bert, and van Zijp, Rudy (eds.) Austrian Economics in Debate. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund (1930 [1961]) Civilization and Its Discontents. Standard ed. Translated and edited by James Strachey. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Jeffrey (1994) “The Politics of Communitarianism.” Critical Review, 8: 297-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, Anna Elisabetta (1987) “Individualism, Social Rules, Tradition: The Case of Friedrich A. Hayek.” Political Theory, 15: 163-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, David (1990) Moral Dealing: Contract, Ethics, and Reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John (1998) Hayek on Liberty. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1994) The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1944) The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1948) Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1952) The Sensory Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1967a) “Notes on the Evolution of Systems of Rules of Conduct.” In Hayek, F. A. (ed.) Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1967b) “The Principles of a Liberal Social Order.” In Hayek, F. A. (ed.) Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1976) Law, Legislation, and Liberty. Vol. II: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1979) The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1988) The Fatal Conceit. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W. F. (1821 [1996]) Philosophy of Right. Translated by Dyde, S.W. Amherst, N. Y.: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas (1651 [1981]) Leviathan. Macpherson, C. B. (ed.) Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1993) Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back Into Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Stephen (1993) The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Stephen (1995) Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, Hans-Hermann (1994) “F. A. Hayek on Government and Social Evolution: A Critique.” The Review of Austrian Economics, 7: 67-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt, Wilhelm von (1791/2 [1993]) The Limits of State Action. Burrow, J. W. (ed.) Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David (1777 [1975]) Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.) revised 3rd ed. by Nidditch, P. H. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, David (1997) “Hayek's Attack on Social Justice.” Critical Review, 11: 81-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1966) Two Essays on Analytical Psychology. 2nd ed. Translated by Hull, R. F. C. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1990) The Undiscovered Self. Translated by Hull, R. F. C. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [This is excerpted from Civilization in Transition, vol. 10 of Jung's Collected Works.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1797 [1996]) The Metaphysics of Morals. Translated and edited by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukathas, Chandran (1989) Hayek and Modern Liberalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Tony (1994) “Realism and Hayek: A Case of Continuing Transformation.” In Colonna, M., Hagemann, H., and Hamouda, O. F. (eds.) Capitalism, Socialism, and Knowledge: The Economics of F. A. Hayek, Vol. II. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Tony (1996) “Hayek and Keynes: A Commonality.” History of Economics Review, 25: 96-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Tony (1997) Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven (1997) “Social Justice: The Hayekian Challenge.” Critical Review, 11: 65-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair (1984) After Virtue. 2nd ed. South Bend, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair (1999) Dependent Rational Animals. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C. B. (1962) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl (1859 [1970]) A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Dobb, Maurice (ed.) New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, C. R., Jr. (1999) “Schumpeter, Democracy, and the Scottish Enlightenment.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155: 573-593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von (1949) Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von (1978) Liberalism: A Socio-Economic Exposition. 2nd ed. Translated by Raico, Ralph Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael (1991) Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Expanded ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael (1962) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Corrected ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard /Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas (1966) Distributive Justice: A Constructive Critique of the Utilitarian Theory of Distribution. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas (1975) Unselfishness: The Role of the Vicarious Affects in Moral Philosophy and Social Theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas (1987) Ethical Idealism: An Inquiry into the Nature and Function of Ideals. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas (1989) Moral Absolutes: An Essay on the Nature and Rationale of Morality. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, Murray N. (1998) The Ethics of Liberty. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael (1984) “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self.” Political Theory, 12: 81-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael (1996) Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael (1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahmitt, Carl (1925 [1986]) Political Romanticism. 2nd ed. Translated by Oakes, Guy Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1983) Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin (1998) Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam (1790 [1982]) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. 6th ed. Raphael, D. D., and Macfie, A. L. (eds.) Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, Robert (1993) “Normative Judgments and Spontaneous Order: The Contractarian Element in Hayek's Thought.” Constitutional Political Economy, 4: 393-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles (1995) Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, Viktor (1986) “Spontaneous Market Order and Social Rules: A Critical Examination of F. A. Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution.” Economics and Philosophy, 2: 75-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, Karen, I. (1999) “Hayek's Implicit Economics: Rules and the Problem of Order.” The Review of Austrian Economics, 11: 129-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael (1990) “The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism.” Political Theory, 18: 6-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1947 [1964]) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by Henderson, A. M., and Parsons, Talcott. Parsons, Talcott (ed.) New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yack, Bernard (1993) The Problems of a Political Animal. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCann, C.R. F. A. Hayek: The Liberal as Communitarian. The Review of Austrian Economics 15, 5–34 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013266204408

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013266204408

Keywords

Navigation