Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting the interfacial adhesion of ultrahigh-modulus polyethylene fibre–vinylester composites using gas plasma treatment

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interfacial adhesion of ultrahigh-modulus polyethylene (UHMPE) fibre–vinylester composites was improved by the oxygen plasma treatment of the UHMPE fibre. The chemical functional group formations on the UHMPE fibre surface by oxygen plasma treatment were analysed using diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and the morphological changes of the UHMPE fibre surface by plasma etching were observed by scanning electron microscopy. The wettability enhancement by the chemical functional group formation and the mechanical interlocking due to the micropits were important factors in improving the interfacial adhesion of the UHMPE fibre–vinylester composites by oxygen plasma treatment. In order to investigate the relative importance of the two factors, wettability enhancement and mechanical interlocking, in the improved interfacial adhesion of the UHMPE fibre–vinylester composites, nitrogen plasma treatment was also performed. Nitrogen plasma treatment of the UHMPE fibre was proved to be effective in the formation of the micropittings and ineffective in the chemical functional group formation in comparison with the oxygen plasma treatment. The interlaminar shear strengths of the nitrogen-plasma-treated UHMPE fibre–vinylester composites showed almost the same value as those of the oxygen-plasma-treated UHMPE fibre–vinylester composites. The wettability enhancement and mechanical interlocking are important in the improvement of interfacial adhesion of UHMPE fibre–vinylester composites by plasma treatment and mechanical interlocking seems to be more important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. SMITH and P. J. LEMSTRA, J. Mater. Sci. 15 (1980) 505.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. A. GEORGE, in “Polymer surfaces and interfaces 2”, edited by W. J. Feast, H. S. Munro and R. W. Richards (Wiley, New York, 1993) pp. 161–201.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. J. BARHAM and A. KELLER, J. Mater. Sci. 20 (1985) 2281.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. M. WARD and N. H. LADIZESKY, Pure Appl. Chem. 57 (1985) 1641.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. C. PREVORSEK, in “Reference book for composite technology”, edited by S. M. Lee (Technomic, Lancaster 1989) pp. 167–74.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. D. VOLPE, L. FAMBRI, R. FENNER, C. MIGLIARESI and A. PEGORETTI, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 3919.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. TABOUDOUCHT, R. OPALKO and H. ISHIDA, Polym. Compos. 13 (1992) 81.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. R. BROWN, P. J. C. CHAPPELL and Z. MATHYS, J. Mater. Sci. 27 (1992) 3167.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Z.-F. LI and A. N. NETRAVALI, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 44 (1992) 319.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Idem., ibid. 44 (1992) 333.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Z.-F. LI, A. N. NETRAVALI and W. SASCHE, J. Mater. Sci. 27 (1992) 4625.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. ROSTAMI, B. ISKANDARANI and I. KAMEL, Polym. Compos. 13 (1992) 207.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. L. KAPLAN, P. W. ROSE, H. X. NGUYEN and H. W. CHANG, in Proceedings of the 33rd International SAMPE Symposium, Anaheim, CA, 7–10 March 1988, edited by G. Carrillo, E. D. Newell, W. D. Brown and P. Phelan (SAMPE, Covina, CA, 1988) p. 551.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. X. NGUYEN, G. RIAHI, G. WOOD and A. POURSARTIP, in Proceedings of the 33rd International SAMPE Symposium, Anaheim, CA, 7–10 March 1988, edited by G. Carrillo, E. D. Newell, W. D. Brown and P. Phelan (SAMPE, Covina, CA, 1988) p. 1721.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. R. BROWN, P. J. C. CHAPPELL and Z. MATHYS, J. Mater. Sci. 27 (1992) 6475.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. GAO and Y. ZENG, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 47 (1993) 2065.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Idem., ibid. 47 (1993) 2093.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. MASSE, J. P. CAVROT, P. FRANCOIS, J. M. LEFEBVRE and B. ESCAIG, Polym. Compos. 15 (1994) 247.

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. H. LADIZESKY and I. M. WARD, J. Mater. Sci. 24 (1989) 3763.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. TISSINGTON, G. POLLARD, and I. M. WARD, ibid. 26 (1991) 82.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. T. MCKENZIE, S. R. GULLER, and J. L. KOENIG, in “Fourier transform infrared characterization of polymers”, edited by H. Ishida (Plenum, New York, 1987) p. 377.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. I. BOWER and W. F. MADDAMS, in “The vibrational spectroscopy of polymers” (Cambridge University press, Cambridge, Cambs., 1989) pp. 163–73.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. M. CHAN, in “Polymer surface modification and characterization” (Carl Hanser, Munich, 1994) p. 239.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jyongsik Jang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moon, S.I., Jang, J. Factors affecting the interfacial adhesion of ultrahigh-modulus polyethylene fibre–vinylester composites using gas plasma treatment. Journal of Materials Science 33, 3419–3425 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013205918208

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013205918208

Keywords

Navigation