Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Birds at a Southern California beach: seasonality, habitat use and disturbance by human activity

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Use of a Santa Barbara beach by people and birds varied in both time and space. There were 100 birds, 18 people and 2 dogs per kilometer. Bird density varied primarily with the season and tide while human activity varied most between weekend and weekday. Bird distributions along the beach were determined mainly by habitat type (particularly a lagoon and exposed rocky intertidal areas) For crows and western gulls, there was some evidence that access to urban refuse increased abundance. Interactions between birds and people often caused birds to move or fly away, particularly when people were within 20 m. During a short observation period, 10% of humans and 39% of dogs disturbed birds. More than 70% of birds flew when disturbed. Bird species varied in the frequency that they were disturbed, partially because a few bird species foraged on the upper beach where contact with people was less frequent. Most disturbances occurred low on the beach. Although disturbances caused birds to move away from humans, most displacement was short enough that variation in human activity did not alter large-scale patterns of beach use by the birds. Birds were less reactive to humans (but not dogs) when beach activity was low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown S,Hickey C,Gill B,Gorman L,Gratto-Trevor C,Haig S,Harrington B,Hunter C,Morrison G,Page G,Sanzenbacher P,Skagen S andWarnock N (2000a) National Shorebird Conservation Assessment: Shorebird Conservation Status, Conservation Units, Population Estimates, Population Targets, and Species Prioritization. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Manomet, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S,Hickey C andHarrington B (eds) (2000b) The U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Manomet, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (1981) The effect of human activity on birds at a coastal bay. Biological Conservation 21: 231-241

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (1986) The effect of human activity on shorebirds in two coastal bays in the northeastern United States. Environmental Conservation 13: 123-130

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (1989) Least tern populations in coastal New Jersey: monitoring and management of a regionallyendangered species. Journal of Coastal Research 5: 801-811

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (1991) Foraging behavior and the effect of human disturbance on the piping plover (Charadrius melodus). Journal of Coastal Research 7: 39-51

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (1993) Shorebird squeeze. Natural History 102: 8-14

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (1994) The effect of human disturbance on foraging behavior and habitat use in piping plover (Charadrius melodus). Estuaries 17: 695-701

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (1998) Effects of motorboats and personal watercraft on flight behavior over a colony of common terns. Condor 100: 528-534

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J andGochfeld M (1991) Human activity influence and diurnal and nocturnal foraging of sanderlings (Calidris alba). Condor 93: 259-265

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J andGochfeld M (1998) Effects of ecotourists on bird behavior at Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Florida. Environmental Conservation 25: 13-21

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan JE,Hubbard DM,Martin DL,Engle JM,Richards DM,Davis GE,Lafferty KD andAmbrose RF (2000) Macrofauna communities of exposed sandy beaches on the Southern California mainland and Channel Islands. In: Brown DR,Mitchell KL andChang HW (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth California Islands Symposium, pp 339-346. OCS Study, MMS 99-0038

  • Fahy KA andWoodhouse CD (1995) 1995 Snowy plover linear restriction monitoring project: Vandenberg Air Force Base. Report prepared for Natural Resources, Vandenberg Air Force Base, Project No. 0S005097

  • Fitzpatrick S andBouchez B (1998) Effects of recreational disturbance on the foraging behaviour of waders on a rocky beach. Bird Study 45: 157-171

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsen GW andSmith EN (1995) Physiological responses of wildlife to disturbance. In: Knight RL andGutswiller KJ (eds) Wildlife and Recreationists, pp 95-107. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe MA,Geissler PH andHarrington BA (1989) Population trends of North American shorebirds based on the International Shorebird Survey. Biological Conservation 49: 185-200

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein ML (1993) Waterbird behavioral responses to human disturbance. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21: 31-39

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimkiewicz K andRobbins CS (1978) Standard abbreviations for common names of birds. North American Bird Bander 3: 16-25

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty KD (2001) Disturbance to wintering western snowy plovers. Biological Conservation (in press)

  • McCrary MD andPierson MO (2000) Influence of human activity on shorebird beach use in Ventura County, California. In: Brown DR,Mitchell KL andChang HW (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth California Islands Symposium, pp 424-427. OCS Study, MMS 99-0038

  • Nudds RL andBryant DM (2000) The energetic cost of short flights in birds. Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 1561-1572

    Google Scholar 

  • Page GW andShuford WD (2000) Southern Pacific Coast Regional Shorebird Plan. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Manomet, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister C,Harrington B andLavine M (1992) The impact of human disturbance on shorebirds at a migration staging area. Biological Conservation 60: 115-126

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttick GM (1979) Foraging behaviour and activity budgets of Curlew sandpipers. Ardea 67: 111-122

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit CJ andVisser GJM (1993) Effects of disturbance on shorebirds: a summary of existing knowledge from the Dutch Wadden Sea and Delta area. Wader Study Group Bulletin 68: 6-19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward C andLow BS (1997) Predictors of vigilance for American crows foraging in an urban environment. Wilson Bulletin 109: 481-489

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lafferty, K.D. Birds at a Southern California beach: seasonality, habitat use and disturbance by human activity. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, 1949–1962 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013195504810

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013195504810