Abstract
Use of a Santa Barbara beach by people and birds varied in both time and space. There were 100 birds, 18 people and 2 dogs per kilometer. Bird density varied primarily with the season and tide while human activity varied most between weekend and weekday. Bird distributions along the beach were determined mainly by habitat type (particularly a lagoon and exposed rocky intertidal areas) For crows and western gulls, there was some evidence that access to urban refuse increased abundance. Interactions between birds and people often caused birds to move or fly away, particularly when people were within 20 m. During a short observation period, 10% of humans and 39% of dogs disturbed birds. More than 70% of birds flew when disturbed. Bird species varied in the frequency that they were disturbed, partially because a few bird species foraged on the upper beach where contact with people was less frequent. Most disturbances occurred low on the beach. Although disturbances caused birds to move away from humans, most displacement was short enough that variation in human activity did not alter large-scale patterns of beach use by the birds. Birds were less reactive to humans (but not dogs) when beach activity was low.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown S,Hickey C,Gill B,Gorman L,Gratto-Trevor C,Haig S,Harrington B,Hunter C,Morrison G,Page G,Sanzenbacher P,Skagen S andWarnock N (2000a) National Shorebird Conservation Assessment: Shorebird Conservation Status, Conservation Units, Population Estimates, Population Targets, and Species Prioritization. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Manomet, Massachusetts
Brown S,Hickey C andHarrington B (eds) (2000b) The U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Manomet, Massachusetts
Burger J (1981) The effect of human activity on birds at a coastal bay. Biological Conservation 21: 231-241
Burger J (1986) The effect of human activity on shorebirds in two coastal bays in the northeastern United States. Environmental Conservation 13: 123-130
Burger J (1989) Least tern populations in coastal New Jersey: monitoring and management of a regionallyendangered species. Journal of Coastal Research 5: 801-811
Burger J (1991) Foraging behavior and the effect of human disturbance on the piping plover (Charadrius melodus). Journal of Coastal Research 7: 39-51
Burger J (1993) Shorebird squeeze. Natural History 102: 8-14
Burger J (1994) The effect of human disturbance on foraging behavior and habitat use in piping plover (Charadrius melodus). Estuaries 17: 695-701
Burger J (1998) Effects of motorboats and personal watercraft on flight behavior over a colony of common terns. Condor 100: 528-534
Burger J andGochfeld M (1991) Human activity influence and diurnal and nocturnal foraging of sanderlings (Calidris alba). Condor 93: 259-265
Burger J andGochfeld M (1998) Effects of ecotourists on bird behavior at Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Florida. Environmental Conservation 25: 13-21
Dugan JE,Hubbard DM,Martin DL,Engle JM,Richards DM,Davis GE,Lafferty KD andAmbrose RF (2000) Macrofauna communities of exposed sandy beaches on the Southern California mainland and Channel Islands. In: Brown DR,Mitchell KL andChang HW (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth California Islands Symposium, pp 339-346. OCS Study, MMS 99-0038
Fahy KA andWoodhouse CD (1995) 1995 Snowy plover linear restriction monitoring project: Vandenberg Air Force Base. Report prepared for Natural Resources, Vandenberg Air Force Base, Project No. 0S005097
Fitzpatrick S andBouchez B (1998) Effects of recreational disturbance on the foraging behaviour of waders on a rocky beach. Bird Study 45: 157-171
Gabrielsen GW andSmith EN (1995) Physiological responses of wildlife to disturbance. In: Knight RL andGutswiller KJ (eds) Wildlife and Recreationists, pp 95-107. Island Press, Washington, DC
Howe MA,Geissler PH andHarrington BA (1989) Population trends of North American shorebirds based on the International Shorebird Survey. Biological Conservation 49: 185-200
Klein ML (1993) Waterbird behavioral responses to human disturbance. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21: 31-39
Klimkiewicz K andRobbins CS (1978) Standard abbreviations for common names of birds. North American Bird Bander 3: 16-25
Lafferty KD (2001) Disturbance to wintering western snowy plovers. Biological Conservation (in press)
McCrary MD andPierson MO (2000) Influence of human activity on shorebird beach use in Ventura County, California. In: Brown DR,Mitchell KL andChang HW (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth California Islands Symposium, pp 424-427. OCS Study, MMS 99-0038
Nudds RL andBryant DM (2000) The energetic cost of short flights in birds. Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 1561-1572
Page GW andShuford WD (2000) Southern Pacific Coast Regional Shorebird Plan. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Manomet, Massachusetts
Pfister C,Harrington B andLavine M (1992) The impact of human disturbance on shorebirds at a migration staging area. Biological Conservation 60: 115-126
Puttick GM (1979) Foraging behaviour and activity budgets of Curlew sandpipers. Ardea 67: 111-122
Smit CJ andVisser GJM (1993) Effects of disturbance on shorebirds: a summary of existing knowledge from the Dutch Wadden Sea and Delta area. Wader Study Group Bulletin 68: 6-19
Ward C andLow BS (1997) Predictors of vigilance for American crows foraging in an urban environment. Wilson Bulletin 109: 481-489
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lafferty, K.D. Birds at a Southern California beach: seasonality, habitat use and disturbance by human activity. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, 1949–1962 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013195504810
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013195504810


