Skip to main content
Log in

External Contribution to Urban Air Pollution

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elevated particulate matter concentrations in urbanlocations have normally been associated with local trafficemissions. Recently it has been suggested that suchepisodes are influenced to a high degree by PM10sources external to urban areas. To further corroboratethis hypothesis, linear regression was sought betweenPM10 concentrations measured at eight urban sites inthe U.K., with particulate sulphate concentration measuredat two rural sites, for the years 1993–1997. Analysis ofthe slopes, intercepts and correlation coefficientsindicate a possible relationship between urban PM10and rural sulphate concentrations. The influences of winddirection and of the distance of the urban from the ruralsites on the values of the three statistical parametersare also explored. The value of linear regression as ananalysis tool in such cases is discussed and it is shownthat an analysis of the sign of the rate of change of theurban PM10 and rural sulphate concentrations providesa more realistic method of correlation. The resultsindicate a major influence on urban PM10 concentrations from the eastern side of the UnitedKingdom. Linear correlation was also sought using PM10 data from nine urban sites in London and nearby ruralRochester. Analysis of the magnitude of the gradients andintercepts together with episode correlation analysisbetween the two sites showed the effect of transportedPM10 on the local London concentrations. This articlealso presents methods to estimate the influence of ruraland urban PM10 sources on urban PM10 concentrations and to obtain a rough estimate of thetransboundary contribution to urban air pollution from thePM10 concentration data of the urban site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clarke, A. G., Willison, M. J. and Zeki, E. M.: 1984, ‘A comparison of urban and rural aerosol composition usingdichotomous samplers’, Atmos. Environ. 18, 1767–1775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjellbrekke, A. G., Lovblad, G., Sjoberg, K., Schaug, J. and Skejelmoen, J. E.: 1995, ‘EMEP Data Report 1993’, European Measurement and Evaluation Programme.

  • King, A. M. and Dorling, S.:1997, ‘PM10 particulate matter – the significance of ambient levels’, Atmos. Environ. 31, 2379–2381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micallef, A. and Colls, J. J.: 1998, ‘The origins of PM10 particulate matter in the U.K. urban atmosphere: the role of sulphate aerosol’, J. Aerosol Sci. 29, 171–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micallef, A. and Colls, J. J.: 1999, ‘Analysis of long-term measurements of airborne concentrations of sulphur dioxideand SO 2–4 in the rural United Kingdom’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 57, 277–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • QUARG: 1996, ‘Airborne ParticulateMatter in the United Kingdom’, Third report of the Quality of Urban Air Review Group, Department of the Environment, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, J. R.: 1997, ‘A UK-wide episode of elevated particle (PM10) concentration inMarch 1996’, Atmos. Environ. 31,2381–2383.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom Review Group on Acid Rain: 1990, ‘Acid Deposition in the United Kingdom 1986–1988’, ThirdReport, Department of the Environment. Stevenage: Warren Spring Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfred Micallef.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grima, R., Micallef, A. & Colls, J.J. External Contribution to Urban Air Pollution. Environ Monit Assess 73, 291–314 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013194403072

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013194403072

Navigation