Research in Science Education

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 267–288 | Cite as

A Complete Circuit is a Complete Circle: Exploring the Potential of Case Materials and Methods to Develop Teachers' Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Science

  • Kirsten R. Daehler
  • Mayumi Shinohara


This study explores the potential of science teaching cases to deepen teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. Discussions of a single case were facilitated with three separate groups of elementary teachers (18 total). Transcriptions of these discussions were analysed according to what each group talked about, the depth of their discussions, and how and when they explored the meaning of challenging science concepts and related this understanding to their pedagogical reasoning. While many teachers began the discussion without a clear understanding of certain key concepts, after a two-hour case discussion and brief hands-on activities they collaboratively developed a deeper understanding of the content. At the same time teachers refined their pedagogical content knowledge around what makes this content hard or easy for Year 4 students and analysed instructional strategies to help students comprehend these tough concepts. Furthermore, the sequence of topics discussed appeared to influence the depth and richness of the group's pedagogical discourse.

science cases teacher education and pedagogical content knowledge 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Clermont, C. P., Krajcik, J. S., & Borko, H. (1993). The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 21-43.Google Scholar
  2. Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263-272.Google Scholar
  3. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (Eds.). (1985). Children's ideas in science. London: Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  4. Fernández-Balboa, J. M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11, 293-306.Google Scholar
  5. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 129-146.Google Scholar
  7. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 3-11.Google Scholar
  8. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.Google Scholar
  9. Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education, 5, 1-20.Google Scholar
  10. Stavy, R. (1991). Children's ideas about matter. School Science and Mathematics, 91, 240-244.Google Scholar
  11. van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673-695.Google Scholar
  12. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1993). Research on alternative con-ceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Weiss, I. R. (1994). A profile of science and mathematics education in the United States: 1993. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirsten R. Daehler
    • 1
  • Mayumi Shinohara
    • 2
  1. 1.WestEd-San Francisco
  2. 2.WestEd-Oakland

Personalised recommendations