Skip to main content
Log in

The biogeography of the Anura of sub-equatorial Africa and the prioritisation of areas for their conservation

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an increasing need for protected areas to conserve biodiversity efficiently. The Anura of sub-equatorial Africa have received little attention, but we quantitatively analyse a database containing presence-only data for anurans of sub-equatorial Africa to determine patterns of distribution and species richness, and discuss the roles of present and past environmental conditions in shaping these patterns. We consider the distribution of areas rich in endemic, range-restricted and Red Data Book (RDB) species to identify areas of significance to conservation. The Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe and adjacent area in Mozambique, southeastern Malawi and the northern coast of KwaZulu/Natal are particularly species rich, whereas the southwestern Cape of South Africa and northwestern Zambia exhibit high degrees of endemism. Four major biogeographical sub-regions are identified, which can be further subdivided into provinces. All statistically significant, current environmental factors together account for 52.6% of species richness. Annual maximum rainfall, soil type variation, minimum temperature and range of elevation were all positively correlated with species richness. Thus, both habitat influences and history appear to have influenced patterns of anuran richness in the region. Generally, areas of high species richness coincide with those high in range-restricted, endemic and RDB species. In South Africa, the northeastern coast and southwestern Cape are hypothesised to have been both refugia and centres of speciation. Results suggest that the current reserve system in sub-equatorial Africa is inadequate for the conservation of the full complement of anuran species in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander WJR (1985) Hydrology of low latitude Southern Hemisphere land masses. Hydrobiologia 125: 75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR and Wake DB (1995) The puzzle of declining amphibian populations. Scientific American 272: 52–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Keisecker JM and Walls SC (1996) Field experiments, amphibian mortality, and UV radiation. BioScience 46: 386–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch WR (1988) South African Red Data Book-Reptiles and Amphibians. South African Natural Scientific Progress Report No. 151. CSIR, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray JR and Curtis JC (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Channing A and Griffin M (1993) An annotated checklist of the frogs of Namibia. Madoqua 18: 101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Channing A and Van Dijk DE (1995) Amphibia. In: Cowan GI (ed) Wetlands of South Africa, pp 193–206. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Pretoria. CTP Book Printers (Pty.), Parow

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe TM (1990) A quantitative analysis of patterns of distribution, species richness and endemism in southern African vertebrates. In: Peters G and Hutterer R (eds) Vertebrates in the Tropics. pp 145–160. Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe TM and Crowe AA (1982) Patterns of distribution, diversity and endemism in Afrotropical birds. Journal of Zoology 198: 417–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies B and Day J (1998) Vanishing Waters. University of Cape Town Press, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa, 487 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies BR, O'Keefe JH and Snaddon CD (1995) River and stream ecosystems in southern Africa: predictably unpredictable. In: Cushing CE, Cummins KW and Minsall GW (eds) Ecosystems of theWorld: River and Stream Ecosystems, pp 537–599. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis DHS (1962) Distribution patterns of southern African Muridae, with notes on some of their fossil antecedents. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museum 2: 56–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment Affairs (1994a) ENPAT (Environmental Potential Atlas): User's Reference, 19 pp

  • Department of Environment Affairs (1994b) ENPAT (Environmental Potential Atlas): National Database Guide, 24 pp 2075

  • Dixon WJ (1990) BMDP Statistical Software. California University of California Press, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkrow DR and Cherry MI (1995) Anuran distribution, diversity, and conservation in South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African Journal of Zoology 30(3): 82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Frances RL and Welbourn PM (1992) Influence of lake pH and macrograzers on the distribution and abundance of nuisance metaphytic algae in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost DR (1985) Amphibian Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Allen Press and the Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas 732 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Götmark F, Ahlund M and Eriksson MOG (1986) Are indices reliable for assessing conservation value for natural areas? An avian case study. Biological Conservation 38: 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillet A and Crowe TM (1985) Patterns of distribution, species richness, endemism and guild composition of water-birds in Africa. African Journal of Ecology 23: 89–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillet A and Crowe TM (1986) A preliminary investigation of patterns of distribution and species richness of southern African waterbirds. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 16(3): 65–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Haffer J (1969) Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165: 131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SP (1961) Climatological Atlas of Africa. Government Printer, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw M, Williams PH and Mace GM (1994) Conservation of Afrotropical antelopes: consequences and efficiency of using different site selection methods and diversity criteria. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 354–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick JB (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25: 127–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht LE (1996) Amphibian decline still a puzzle. BioScience 46: 172–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR (1989) Introduction to some Australian developments in conservation evaluation. Biological Conservation 50: 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR and Usher MB (1981) Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biological Conservation 21: 79–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Nicholls AO and Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43: 63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Muriuki JN, deKlerk HM, Williams PH, Bennun LA, Crowe TM and van den Berge E (1997) Using patterns of distribution and diversity of Kenyan birds to select and prioritise areas for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 191–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson G and Platnick NI (1981) Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. Columbia University Press, New York, 567 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker C (1982) The western Cape lowland fynbos. What is there left to Conserve? Veld and Flora 68: 98–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore NI and Carruthers VC (1995) South African Frogs. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg, 322 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips K (1990) Where have all the frogs and toads gone? BioScience 40: 422–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Picker MD (1985) Hybridization and habitat selection in Xenopus gilli and Xenopus laevis in the southwestern Cape province. Copeia 3: 574–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Poynton JC (1964) The Amphibia of southern Africa: a faunal study. Annals of the Natal Museum 17: 1–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Poynton JC and Broadley DG (1978) The herpetofauna. In: Werger MJA (ed) Biogeography and Ecology of Southern Africa, pp 925–948. Junk, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH, Eversham BC and Gibbons DW (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diverstiy hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RC (1994) Ad Hoc reservations: forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems? Conservation Biology 8(3): 662–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RC, Johnson IR and Wilson PD (1994) Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 242–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo AG (1994) Iterative selection procedures: centres of endemism and optimal placement of reserves. Strelitzia 1: 231–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo AG and Siegfried WR (1992) Where should nature reserves be located in the Cape floristic region, South Africa? Models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximizing the protection of floral diversity. Conservation Biology 6(2): 243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo AG and Siegfried WR (1990) Protection of fynbos vegetation: ideal and real world options. Biological Conservation 54: 15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage JM (1973) The geographic distribution of frogs: patterns and predictions In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, 470 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart MM (1967) Amphibians of Malawi. State University of New York Press, New York, 179 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckenburg BR (1969) Effective temperature as an ecological factor in southern Africa. Zoologica Africana 4(2): 145–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD and Mallorie HC (1985) Rarity, species richness and conservation: butterflies of the Atlas mountains in Morrocco. Biological Conservation 33: 95–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpie JK and Crowe TM (1994) Patterns of distribution, diversity and endemism of larger African mammals. South African Journal of Zoology 29(1): 19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk DE (1966) Systematic and field keys to the families, genera and described species of South African anuran tadpoles. Annals of the Natal Museum 18: 231–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ and Williams PH (1991) What to protect?-systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55: 235–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake DB and Morowitz HJ (1991) Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon? Findings and recommendations. Alytes 9(2): 33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • White F (1981a) Vegetation Map of Africa. UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • White F (1981b) The Vegetation of Africa: A Descriptive Memoir to Accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/ UNSO Vegetation Map of Africa. UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams PH (1993) Using WORLDMAP: Priority Areas for Biodiversity, Version 3.06. The Natural History Museum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1985) The biological diversity crisis: a challenge to science. Issues in Science and Technology 2: 20–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seymour, C., De Klerk, H., Channing, A. et al. The biogeography of the Anura of sub-equatorial Africa and the prioritisation of areas for their conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, 2045–2076 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013137409896

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013137409896

Navigation