Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrology and substrates: determinants of oligochaete distribution in lowland streams (The Netherlands)

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most soft-bottomed, lowland streams in the Netherlands discharge regimes largely follow the precipitation pattern. Winter discharges are higher and much more dynamic then summer discharges, although rain storms throughout the year cause unexpected peak flows. Minimal precipitation, reduced stream flow and droughts can occur during the summer months. Lowland stream habitat, particularly in The Netherlands, is hydrologically dynamic, with substrates frequently moved or disturbed. Differences in discharge patterns in Dutch soft-bottomed lowland streams are expected to affect distribution patterns of macroinvertebrates and thus oligochaetes. Ten small to medium sized lowland streams, differing from one another in hydrological regime, were studied. Five major habitats in each stream were assessed on three occasions over a 15-month period. Each habitat sampled with a micro-macrofauna shovel; during each sampling period, several environmental parameters, especially hydrological and substrate parameters, were measured. Ordination (CANOCO) (Ter Braak, 1989) and statistical tests (chi-squared test) (Lindgren & McElrath, 1970) were used to determine the major oligochaete distribution patterns between streams as well as between habitats within each stream. Each stream was characterized by its oligochaete assemblage; general distribution patterns and individual oligochaete–substratum relationships were documented. Hydro-morphological parameters together explained the differences in major distribution patterns. Preferences of oligochaetes for specific structural habitats are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boon, P. J., 1998. River restoration in five dimensions. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwat. Ecosystems 8: 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O., 1964. Observations on the biology of lake dwelling Tubificidae (Oligochaeta). Arch. Hydrobiol. 60: 385–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O., 1971. A guide for the identification of British aquatic Oligochaeta. Freshwat. Biol. Ass., Sc. Publ. 22.

  • Chekanovskaya, O. V., 1962. The aquatic oligochaete fauna of the U.S.S.R. Opred. Faune SSSR 78: 1–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildrew, A. G. & C. R. Townsend, 1977. The influence of substrate on the functional response of Plectrocnemia conspersa (Curtis) larvae (Trichoptera: Polycentropidae). Oecologia 31: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M., 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am. Nat. 113: 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laakso, M., 1969. Oligochaeta from brackish water near Tvärmine, south-west Finnland. Ann. zool. fenn. 6: 98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, B. W. & G. W. McElrath, 1970. Introduction to Probability and Statistics. MacMillan Comp., London (3rd edn.): 305 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., 1988. Stream ecosystem theory: observed patterns and potential applications. J. n. am. Bentol. Soc. 7: 263–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. C., L. B. M. Petersen & J. Lacoursière, 1992. A building-block model for stream restoration. In Boon, P. J., Calow P. & G. E. Petts (eds), River Conservation and Management. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester: 293–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Särkkä, J., 1987. The occurrence of oligochaetes in lake chains receiving pulp mill waste and their relation to eutrophication on the trophic scale. Hydrobiologia 155: 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, R. W., 1915. Morphologische und Biologische studien an Naididen in Sachsen und Böhmen. Julius Klinkhardt, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B., J. A. Gore & V. H. Resh, 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. J. n. am. Bentol. Soc. 7(4): 307–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C. J. F., 1987. CANOCO-A FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal component analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1). TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science, Wageningen, The Netherlands: 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timm, T., 1970. On the fauna of the Estonian Oligochaeta. Pedobiol. 10: 52–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolkamp, H. H., 1980. Organism-substrate relationships in lowland streams. Agricultural Research Reports 907, Doctoral thesis, Wageningen: 211 pp.

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M., 1987. Aquatic oligochaetes in ditches. Hydrobiologia 155: 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M., 1994. Water typology: a tool for water management and nature conservation. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 25: 1911–1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M., J. M. C. Driessen, H. G. Mosterdijk & J. A. Schot, 1998. The 5-S-Model, an integrated approach for stream rehabilitation. In Hansen, H. O. & B. L. Madsen (eds), River Restoration’ 96, Session Lectures Proceedings. National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark: 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verdonschot, P.F. Hydrology and substrates: determinants of oligochaete distribution in lowland streams (The Netherlands). Hydrobiologia 463, 249–262 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013132514610

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013132514610

Navigation