Skip to main content
Log in

A Correction of an Inconsistency in my Paper “Cauchy's Theorem on Manifolds”

  • Published:
Journal of elasticity and the physical science of solids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Cauchy postulates are required for the formulation and proof of Cauchy's theorem for the existence of stress. The generalized postulates and theorem in the geometric setting of differentiable manifolds was considered in a previous paper. This note presents an inconsistency in one of the proposed postulates, the boundedness postulate, and corrects it by specifying a weaker requirement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. Degiovanni, A. Marzocchi and A. Musesti, Cauchy fluxes associated with tensor fields having divergence measure. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 147(1999) 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Segev, The geometry of Cauchy's fluxes. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 154(2000) 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Segev and G. Rodnay, Cauchy's theorem on manifolds. J. Elasticity 56(2000) 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Segev, Forces and the existence of stresses in invariant continuum mechanics. J. Math. Phys. 27(1986) 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Truesdell, A First Course in Rational Continuum Mechanics, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segev, R. A Correction of an Inconsistency in my Paper “Cauchy's Theorem on Manifolds”. Journal of Elasticity 63, 55–59 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013085312562

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013085312562

Navigation