Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical and pharmacokinetic data of a docetaxel-epirubicin combination in metastatic breast cancer

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to explore activity and pharmacokinetic data of a docetaxel-epirubicin combination we analyzed a population of 60 metastatic breast cancer patients. All the patients had an ECOG performance status < 3; 41 patients (68%) had visceral metastases as dominant site of disease, including 33% with liver metastases. Three or more involved organs were present in 43% of patients; 35% had received prior hormonotherapy; 10% for metastatic disease. Twenty-five patients (42%) had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy; 15% a CAF regimen. Twenty per cent of patients had less than 12 months disease-free interval. Docetaxel and epirubicin were both given at a dose of 75 mg/m2 i.v. d.1 every 3 weeks. After a median of six cycles we had 5 CR (8.3%), 40 PR (66.6%), 7 NC (11.6%), and 8 PD (13.3%). Response rates in patients with visceral and liver metastases were 78% and 55% respectively. Premenopausal status, < 1 year disease free survival and > 3 metastatic sites were associated with a lower response rate. After a median follow-up of 19 months (12–36), median disease-free survival is 11 months and median overall survival has not been reached. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 75% of courses but with febrile neutropenia in 6.2% of courses only. Non-hematologic toxicity wasn’t clinically important. A NYHA class III reversible cardiac failure was observed in one patient (1.6%). The pharmacokinetic evaluation in 16 patients has shown that docetaxel transiently interfered with epirubicin plasma level when docetaxel was administered 1 h after epirubicin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tomiak E, Piccart M, Mignolet F: Characterisation of complete responders to combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: a retrospective EORTC Breast Group Study. Eur J Cancer 32: 1876-1887, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  2. A'Hern RPA, Smith IE, Ebbs SR: Chemotherapy and survival in advanced breast cancer: the inclusion of doxorubicin in Cooper type regimens. Br J Cancer 67: 801-805, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hortobagy G: Docetaxel in breast cancer and a rationale for combination chemotherapy. Oncology 6(suppl 6): 11-15, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crown J: Phase III randomized trials of docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Sem Oncol 26(suppl 8): 33-38, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ravdin TM: Treatment of patients resistant to anthracycline therapy. Anticancer Drugs 7(suppl 2): 13-16, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  6. Launchbury AP, Habboubi N: Epirubicin and doxorubicin: a comparison of their characteristics, therapeutic activity and toxicity. Cancer Treat Rev 19: 197-228, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  7. French Epirubic in Study Group: A prospective randomized phase III trial comparing combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil and either doxorubicin or epirubicin. J Clin Oncol 6: 679-688, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sparano JA: Doxorubicin/taxane combinations: cardiac toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Sem Oncol 3(Suppl 9): 14-19, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  9. Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association: Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels. 8th Edn, Boston, MA, Little Brown, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  10. Villani F, Misrachi D, Galimberti M: Cardiac arrhytmia and ischaemic events after combination chemotherapy for testicular cancer. Eur Heart J 15: 1533-1536, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A: Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47: 207-214, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vergniol JC, Bruno R, Montay G, Frydman A: Determination of taxotere in human plasma by a semi-automated highperformance liquid chromatographic method. J Chromatogr 582: 273-278, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  13. Camaggi CM, Comparsi R, Strocchi E, Testoni F, Angelelli B, Pannuti F: Epirubicin and doxorubicin comparative metabolism and pharmacokinetics. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 21: 221-228, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  14. Longo DL, Duffey PL, De Vita Jr VT, Wesley MN, Hubbard SM, Young RC: The calculation of actual or received dose intensity: a comparison of published methods. J Clin Oncol 9: 2042-2051, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fulton B, Spencer CM: Docetaxel: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of metastatic breast cancer. Drugs 51: 1075-1092, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  16. Conte PF, Baldini E, Gennari A, Michelotti A, Salvadori B, Tibaldi C: Dose-finding study and pharmacokinetics of epirubic in and paclitaxel over 3-h: a regimen with high activity and low cardiotoxicity in advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 2510-2517, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  17. French Epirubicin Study Group: Epirubicin-based chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients: role of dose-intensity and duration of treatment. J Clin Oncol 18: 3115-3124, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pagani O: Taxoids in combination with epirubicin: the search for improved outcomes in breast cancer. Sem Oncol 25(suppl 12): 23-26, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sparano JA, O'Neill A, Schaefer PL, Falkson C, Wood WC: Phase II trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel plus granulocytecolony-stimulating factor in metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (E1196) J Clin Oncol 18: 2369-2377, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nabholtz J-M, Mackey J, Smyle M, Tonkin K: Taxane-based three-drug com bination in metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Sem Oncol 25(suppl 12): 27-31, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yamamoto N, Watanabe T, Katsumata N: Construction and validation of a practical prognostic index in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16: 2401-2408, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  22. Henderson JC, Allegra JC, Woodcock T: Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with doxorubic in in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 7: 560-571, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fumoleau P, Delgado FM, Delozier T, Monnier A, Delgado MAG, Kerbrat P, Garcia-Gitalt E, Keiling R, Namer M, Colson MT, Goudier MJ, Chollet P, Lecourt L, Montcuquet P: Phase II trial of weekly intravenous vinorelbine in first line advanced breast cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 11: 1245-1252, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alexandre J, Bleuzen P, Bonneterre J, Sutherland W, Misset JL, Guastalla J-P, Viens P, Faivre S, Chahine A, Spielman M, Bensmaine A, Marty M: Factors predicting for efficacy and safety of docetaxel in a compassionate-use cohort of 825 heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 18: 562-573, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  25. Klink-Alakl M, Riva A, Bruno R, Azli N, Lebecq A: Taxotere safety profile in patients with liver metastases with or without impaired liver function. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 16: 220a, (abs 770), 1997

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nabholtz JM, Smylie M, Mackey J, Au E-J, Tonkin K, Au R: Docetaxel and anthracycline polychemotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Sem Oncol 26(suppl 8): 47-52, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gianni L, Munzone E, Capri G: Paclitaxel by 3 h infusion in combination with bolus doxorubicin in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer: high antitumor efficacy and cardiac effects in a dose-finding and sequence-finding study. J Clin Oncol 13: 2688-2699, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gehl J, Boesgaard M, Paaske T, Jensen BV, Dombernowsky P: Combined doxorubic in and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer: effective and cardiotoxic. Ann Oncol 7: 687-693, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gianni L, Vigano L, Locatelli A, Capri G, Giani A, Tarenzi E, Bonadonna G: Human pharmacokinetic characterization and in vitro study of the interaction between doxorubicin and paclitaxel in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 1906-1915, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gottesman MM, Pastan I: Biochemistry of multidrug resistance mediated by the multidrug transporter. Annu Rev Biochem 62: 385-427, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  31. Webster L, Linsenmeyer M, Millward M, Morton C, Bishop J, Woodcock D: Measurement of Cremophor EL following taxol: plasma levels sufficient to reverse drug exclusion mediated by the multi-drug resistant phenotype. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 1685-1690, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  32. Woodcock DM, Linsenmeyer ME, Chojnowski G, Kriegler AB, Nink V, Webster LK, Sawyer WH: Reversal of multidrug resistance by surfactants. BrJ Cancer 66: 62-68, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rowinsky EK: The development and the clinical utility of the taxane class of antimicrotubule chemotherapy agents. Annu Rev Med 48: 353-374, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  34. van Oostrerom AT, Schrijvers D: Docetaxel (taxotere), a review of preclinical and clinical experience. Part II: clinical experience. Anticancer Drugs 6: 356-368, 1995

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Airoldi, M., Cattel, L., Pedani, F. et al. Clinical and pharmacokinetic data of a docetaxel-epirubicin combination in metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 70, 185–195 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013070612986

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013070612986

Navigation