Abstract
This article examines the mass public's perceptions of the factors that actually influence Supreme Court decisions as well those that ought to influence such decisions. We expect significant discrepancies between what the public believes ought to be the case and what it perceives to actually be the case with regard to Supreme Court decision making and that these discrepancies have a significant negative impact on the public's assessment of the Court. More specifically, we hypothesize that the public believes that political factors have more influence on the Court than “ought” to be the case and that the public perceives traditional legal factors to be less influential than they should be. We find that the expected discrepancies do exist and significantly detract from popular regard for the Court.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adamany, David W. (1973). Legitimacy, realigning elections and the Supreme Court. Wisconsin Law Review 1973: 790–846.
Adamany, David W., and Grossman, Joel B. (1983). Support for the Supreme Court as a national policymaker. Law and Policy Quarterly 5: 405–437.
Becker, Theodore L. (1964). Political Behavioralism and Modern Jurisprudence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Bork, Robert H. (1990). The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: The Free Press.
Brisbin, Richard A. (1996). Slaying the dragon: Segal, Spaeth and the function of law in Supreme Court decision making. American Journal of Political Science 40: 1004–1017.
Caldeira, Gregory A. (1986). Neither the purse or the sword: dynamics of public confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review 80: 1209–1226.
Caldeira, Gregory A. (1994). Review of The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. The Law and Politics Book Review 3: 98–100.
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Gibson, James L. (1992). The etiology of public support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science 36: 635–664.
Canon, Bradley C. (1993). Review of The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model by Jeffrey Segal and Harold J. Spaeth. Law and Politics Book Review3 (September).
Casey, Gregory (1974). The Supreme Court and myth: an empirical investigation. Law & Society Review 8: 385–419.
Casey, Gregory (1976). Popular perceptions of Supreme Court rulings. American Politics Quarterly 4: 3–45.
Dolbeare, Kenneth (1967). The public views the Supreme Court. In Herbert Jacob (ed.), Law, Politics and the Federal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown and Co, pp. 194–212.
Dolbeare, Kenneth M., and Hammond, Phillip E. (1968). The political party basis of attitudes toward the Supreme Court. Public Opinion Quarterly 37: 16–30.
Ely, John Hart (1980). Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fiscus, Ronald J. (1991). Of constitutions and constitutional interpretation. Polity 24: 313–322.
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Baird, Vanessa (1998). On the legitimacy of national high courts. American Political Science Review 92: 343–358.
Handberg, Roger, and Maddox, William S. (1982). Public opinion of the Supreme Court in the 1970s. American Politics Quarterly 10: 333:46.
Hirsch, Herbert, and Donohew, Lewis (1968). A note on black–white differences in attitudes toward the Supreme Court. Social Science Quarterly 49: 557–563.
Jaros, Dean, and Roper, Robert (1980). The Supreme Court, myth, diffuse support, specific support, and legitimacy. American Politics Quarterly 8: 85–105.
Kessel, John H. (1966). Public perceptions of the Supreme Court. Midwest Journal of Political Science 10: 167–191.
Knight, Jack, and Epstein, Lee (1996). The norm of stare decisis. American Journal of Political Science 40: 1018–1035.
Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph (1968a). Public opinion and the Supreme Court: the Goldwater campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly 32: 31–50.
Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph (1968b). Public opinion and the United States Supreme Court: a preliminary mapping of some prerequisites for court legitimation of regime changes. Law & Society Review 2: 357–382.
Murphy, Walter F., Tanenhaus, Joseph, and Kastner, Daniel (1973). Public Evaluations of Constitutional Courts: Alternative Explanations. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Scheb, John, and Lyons, William (2000). The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court. Social Science Quarterly 81: 928–940.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. (1993). The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. (1996a). The influence of stare decisis on the votes of United States Supreme Court justices. American Journal of Political Science 40: 971–1003.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. (1996b). Norms, dragons and stare decisis: a response. American Journal of Political Science 40: 1064–1082.
Sigelman, Lee (1979). Black–white differences in attitudes toward the Supreme Court: a replication of the 1970s. Social Science Quarterly 60: 113–119.
Stumpf, Harry (1967). The political efficacy of judicial symbolism. Western Political Quarterly 19: 293–303.
Tanenhaus, Joseph, and Murphy, Walter F. (1981). Patterns of public support for the Supreme Court: a panel study. Journal of Politics 43: 24–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scheb, J.M., Lyons, W. Judicial Behavior and Public Opinion: Popular Expectations Regarding the Factors That Influence Supreme Court Decisions. Political Behavior 23, 181–194 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013037915485
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013037915485