Skip to main content
Log in

Accountability Testing Without Accountability?

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Ainsworth, L. (2000, November). Test Pilots. Canadian Living. 171-174.

  • American Educational Research Association (2000, July). Position statement concerning high-stakes testing in Pre K-12 education. Available at AERA web site (http://www.aera.net).

  • American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F.R. &; Meaghan, D.E. (2001). Renewing the debate over the use of standardized testing in the evaluation of learning and teaching. Interchange, 32(2).

  • Froese-Germain, B. (2001). Standardized testing + high stakes decisions = educational inequity. Interchange, 32(2).

  • Haertel, E.H. (1999). Performance assessment and education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(9), 662-666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, C.M. &; Bordignon, C. (2001). An examination of English teachers' opinions about the Ontario Grade 9 reading and writing test. Interchange, 32(2).

  • Linn, R.L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R.L. (1993). Educational assessment: Expanded expectations and challenges. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M.W. &; Shepard, L.A. (1995). Improving education through standards-based reform: A report of the National Academy of Education panel on standards-based education reform. Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 13-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECTA Report. (1977, Fall). Expert analysis of grade 3 assessment confirms teacher concerns. The Reporter, 37-38.

  • Popham, W.J. (1999). Where large scale educational assessment is heading and why it shouldn't. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(3), 13-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R.J., Baxter, G.P. &; Pine, J. (May 1992). Performance assessments: Political rhetoric and measurement reality. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 22-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1994). Assessment for measurement or standards: The peril and promise of large-scale assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 231-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L.A. (1989). Why we need better assessments. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 4-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L.A. (1997). The centrality of test use and consequences for test validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 5-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, B.L. &; Jones, K. (2000). Kentucky lesson: How high stakes school accountability undermines a performance-based curriculum vision. In B.L. Whitford &; K. Jones (Eds.), Accountability assessment, and teacher commitment: Lessons from Kentucky's reform efforts (pp. 9-24). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1989, April). Teaching to the (authentic) test. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41-47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lam, T.C., Bordignon, C. Accountability Testing Without Accountability?. Interchange 32, 191–202 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013022527681

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013022527681

Keywords

Navigation