Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strategies and Dispositional Correlates of Sexual Coercion Perpetrated by Women: An Exploratory Investigation

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research tests whether theoretical constructs typically associated with male perpetrators of sexual coercion are predictive of women who perpetrate sexual coercion. We administered a questionnaire that contained measures of sexual experience, social dominance, ambivalent sexism, sex roles, attitudes toward sexual harassment, and lovestyle approaches toward intimate relationships to a sample of women undergraduates. Results found 18% of women to report engaging in sexually coercive behaviors. Coercive women exhibited higher tolerance of sexual harassment, and were significantly higher in femininity than noncoercive women. Coercive women were also found to embrace a ludic (manipulative, game-playing approach toward love) lovestyle significantly more than noncoercive women, while pragma (a logical approach toward love) was negatively associated with coercion. Lastly, a significant difference was found between coercive and noncoercive women and self-reported victimization. Eighty-one percent of women who reported using coercive strategies in their relationships also reported having been sexually victimized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, P. B. (1996). Correlates of college women's self reports of heterosexual aggression. Sexual Abuse Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 121-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, D. M., & Compton, S. V. (1997). Patterns of sexual coercion in adult heterosexual relationships: An exploration of male victimization. Family Process, March, 36(1), 81-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, F. S., Madura, M., & Weaver, L. (1998). Premarital sexual aggressors: A multivariate analysis of social, relational and individual variables. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 56-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fain, T. C., & Anderton, D. L. (1987). Sexual harassment: Organizational context and diffuse status. Sex Roles, 17, 291-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiebert, M. S., & Tucci, M. (1998). Sexual coercion: Men victimized by women. Journal of Men's Studies, 6(2), 127-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, M., Byrne, D., & Hamburger, M. E. (1995). Coercive heterosexual sexuality in dating relationships of college students: Implications of differential male–female experiences. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 69-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalichman, S. C., Sarwer, D. B., Johnson, J. R., Ali, S. A., Early, J., & Tuten, J. T. (1993). Sexual coercive behavior and love styles: A replication and extension. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 6, 91-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455-457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual Experiences Survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422-423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Leonard, K. E., Beezley, D. A., & Oros, C. J. (1985). Non-stranger sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12, 981-992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. A. (1973). The Colors of Love. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization. Family Relations, 35, 383-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953-962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, D. B., & Percival, E. (1989). Ideology of experience? Sex Roles, 20, 135-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConaghy, N., & Zamir, R. (1995). Heterosexual and homosexual coercion, sexual orientation and sexual roles in medical students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 489-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muelenhard, C. L., & Falcon, P. L. (1990). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muelenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, L. F., Byers, E. S., Finkelman, L. (1998). A comparison of male and female college student's experiences of sexual coercion. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(2), 177-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarwer, D. B., Kalichman, S. C., Johnson, J. R., Early, J., & Akram, A. (1993). Sexual aggression and love styles: An exploratory study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 265-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, C. K., Berry, C. J., & Wiles, K. A. (1984). Violence in college students' dating relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 530-548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H. (1999). An analysis of empirical estimates of sexual aggression: Victimization and perpetration. Violence and Victims, 14(3), 241-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1998). The dynamics and impact of sexual coercion of men by women. Sexually aggressive women: Current perspectives and controversies (pp. 121-143). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. W., & Humphrey, J. A. (1994). Women's aggression in heterosexual conflicts. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 195-202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Castleton State College, USA;

    Brenda L. Russell

  2. University of Illinois, USA

    Debra L. Oswald

Authors
  1. Brenda L. Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Debra L. Oswald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brenda L. Russell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, B.L., Oswald, D.L. Strategies and Dispositional Correlates of Sexual Coercion Perpetrated by Women: An Exploratory Investigation. Sex Roles 45, 103–115 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013016502745

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013016502745

Keywords

Search

Navigation