Skip to main content
Log in

Problem Definition in Marital and Family Therapy: A Qualitative Study

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes findings from a grounded theory study on the process of constructing problem definitions by marital and family therapists. Coding of the observations and interviews resulted in two meta-problem definition processes. In the first meta-process clinicians kept their definitions internal to themselves during the therapy session. In contrast, the second meta-definition process involved clinicians bringing forth their internal problem definitions and incorporating them into the therapeutic conversation. Implications for existing conceptualizations and marital and family therapy practice and supervision are discussed, as well as suggestions for further consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler P.A., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N.K. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 109–126). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenail, R. J., & Maione, P. (1997). Sensemaking in clinical qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 3, 1–7. Accessed June 2, 1997. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/ QR3-1/sense.html.

  • Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668–1674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. (1994). Narrative inquiry with children: A generative form of preservice teacher research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 7, 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, J. E. (1992). Science or serendipity? What we know about clinical judgment in mental health. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14, 458–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garb, H. N. (1994). Toward a second generation of statistical prediction rules in psychodiagnosis and personality assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W., Lidz, C. W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1996a). Clinical versus actuarial predictions of violence in patients with mental illnesses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 602–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W., Lidz, C. W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1996b). Comparison of actuarial methods for identifying repetitively violent patients with mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. (1959). The effectiveness of clinicians' judgments: The diagnosis of organic brain damage from the Bender-Gestalt test. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. (1968). “Simple” models or simple processes? Some research on clinical judgments. American Psychologist, 23, 483–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L., & Werts, C. (1966). The reliability of clinician's judgments: Amultitraitmultimethod approach. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L.S., Heatherington, L., & Friedlander, M.L. (1996). The events-based approach to couple and family therapy research. In D.H. Sprenkle & S.M. Moon (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 411–428). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. (1993). Reading signs. In A. H. Rambo, A. Heath, & R. J. Chenail, Practicing therapy: Exercises for growing therapists (pp. 89–152). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker, L. L., Trepper, T. S., Wetchler, J. L., & Fontaine, K. L. (1995). The influence of therapist values, religiosity, and gender in the initial assessment of sexual addiction by family therapists. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. (1986). Clinical and statistical prediction: A retrospective and would-be integrative perspective. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 376–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. (1988). Judgment, inference, and reasoning in clinical perspective. In D. C. Turk, & P. Salovey (Eds.), Reasoning, inference, and judgment in clinical psychology (pp. 233–250). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivey, D. C. (1995). Family history, parenting attitudes, gender roles, and clinician perceptions of family and family member functioning: Factors related to gender inequitable practice. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivey, D. C. (1996). Family history and gender roles: Critical factors in practitioners' views of family interactions. Contemporary Family Therapy, 18, 425–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivey, D. C., Scheel, M. J., & Jankowski, P. J. (1999). A contextual perspective of clinical judgment in couples and family therapy: Is the bridge too far? Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. A., & Clossick, M. L. (1996). Sexism in family therapy: Does training in gender make a difference? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 22, 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. (1988). Rationalism and constructivism in clinical judgment. In D. C. Turk, & P. Salovey (Eds.), Reasoning, inference, and judgment in clinical psychology (pp. 155–181). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollum E. E., & Russell, C. S. (1992). Mother-blaming in family therapy: An empirical investigation. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1957). When shall we use our heads instead of the formula? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4, 268–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. H. (1993). Theories of developmental psychology. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1986). The analysis of interview-narratives. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 233–255). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 261–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsof, W.M., & Wynne, L.C. (1995). The effectiveness and efficacy of marital and family therapy: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 341–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafuls, S.E., & Moon, S.M. (1996). Grounded theory methodology in family therapy research. In D.H. Sprenkle, & S.M. Moon (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 64–80). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. (1986). Prediction and clinical inference: Forty years later. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 362–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 178–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D.H., & Bailey, C.E. (1995). Editor's introduction. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 339–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohmer, D. C., Shivy, V. A., & Chiodo, A. L. (1990). Information processing strategies in counselor hypothesis testing: The role of selective memory and expectancy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, D. C., Salovey, P., & Prentice, D. A. (1988). Psychotherapy: An informationprocessing perspective. In D. C. Turk & P. Salovey (Eds.), Reasoning, inference, and judgment in clinical psychology (pp. 1–14). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B.A. (1981). Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: One way of organizing the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory. Quality and Quantity, 15, 225–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S. J. (1986). The nature of interviewing. Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 45, 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zygmond, M. J., & Denton, W. (1988). Gender bias in marital therapy: Amultidimensional scaling analysis. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 16, 262–272.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Jankowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jankowski, P.J., Ivey, D.C. Problem Definition in Marital and Family Therapy: A Qualitative Study. Contemporary Family Therapy 23, 419–439 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013001012043

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013001012043

Navigation