Abstract
Peat was employed as a biological filter material for the removal of hydrogen sulphide (H2> S) dimethyl sulphide (Me2S) and methyl mercaptan (MeSH) from odorous ventilation air. Removal of H2S was possible without the need to inoculate the filter material with oxidizing microbes whereas Me2S required inoculation for degradation. The removal of Me2S was decreased as a result of MeSH addition. Liming of the filter material, i.e., addition of calcium hydroxide, increased removal efficiency and activated the oxidation of H2S without any adaptation period. As a consequence of the poor Me2S removal efficiency of natural peat, a limed and inoculated biofilter was needed to purify mixtures of gases containing sulphur. The highest H2S load tested with limed but otherwise natural peat was 136 g-S m-3 day-1, yielding a 99 % reduction. The maximum Me2S elimination capacity with limed and inoculated peat was 175 g-S m-3day-1, but removal became unstable when the load exceeded 150 g-S m-3day-1. The maximum MeSH load tested was 107 g-S m-3day-1, yielding 98 % removal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Budwill, K. and Coleman, R. N.: 2000, ‘Removal of Dimethyl Sulfide Vapors in Peat-based Biofilters’, in Proceedings of the Air & Waste Management Association’s 93rd Annual Conference and Exhibition, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A., June 18-22, 2000, paper 353, 9 pp.
Carlson, D. A. and Leiser, C. P.: 1966, ‘Soil Beds for the Control of Sewage Odors’, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 38, 829–840.
Cho K-S., Hirai, M. and Shoda, M.: 1991, ‘Removal of Dimethyl Sulfide by the Peat Seeded with Night Soil Sludge’, 71, 289–291.
Cho K-S., Hirai, M. and Shoda, M.: 1992, ‘Degradation of Hydrogen Sulfide by Xanthomonas sp. Strain DY44 Isolated from Peat’, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 1183–1189.
De Zwart, J. M. M. and Kuenen, J. G.: 1992, ‘C1-cycle of Sulfur Compounds’, Biodegrad. 3, 37–59.
Hirai, M., Ohtake, M. and Shoda, M.: 1990, ‘Removal Kinetics of Hydrogen Sulfide, Methanethiol and Dimethyl Sulfide by Peat Biofilters’, J. Ferment. Bioeng. 70, 334–339.
Jensen, A. B. and Webb, C.: 1995, ‘Treatment of H2S-containing Gases: A Review of Microbiological Alternatives’, Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 17, 2–10.
Kangas, J.; Nevalainen, A.; Manninen, A. and Savolainen, H.: 1986, ‘Ammonia, Hydrogen Sulphide and Methyl Mercaptides in Finnish Municipal Sewage Plants and Pumping Stations’, Sci. Total Environ 57, 49–55.
Kelly, D. P. and Harrison, A. P.: 1989, ‘Aerobic Chemolithotrophic Bacteria and Associated Organisms’ in Hensyl, W.R et al (ed.) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Volume 3, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 1842–1858.
Marttila, O., Jaakkola, J. J. K., Vilkka, V., Jäppinen, P. and Haahtela, T.: 1994, ‘The South Karelia Air Pollution Study: The Effects of Malodorous Sulfur Compounds from Pulp Mills on Respiratory and Other Symptoms in Children.’, Environ. Res. 66, 152–159.
Morton, R. L. and Caballero, R. C.: 1997, ‘Removing Hydrogen Sulfide from Wastewater Treatment Facilities’ Air Process Streams with a Biotrickling Filter’, Air and Waste Management Assocoation’s 90th annual meeting, Toronto, Canada. 97-RA71C.06.
Park, S-J., Cho, K.-S., Hirai, M. and Shoda, M.: 1993, ‘Removability of Malodorous Gases from a Night Soil Treatment Plant by a Pilot-scale Peat Biofilter Inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus DW44’, J. Ferment. Bioeng. 76, 55–59.
Partti-Pellinen, K., Marttila, O., Vilkka, V., Jaakkola, J. J. K.; Jäppinen, P. and Haahtela, T.: 1996, ‘The South Karelia Air Pollution Study: Effects of Low-level Exposure to Malodorous Sulfur Compounds on Symptoms’, Arch. Environ. Health 51, 315–320.
Smet, E., Chasaya, G., Van Langenhove, H. and Verstraete, W.: 1996, ‘The Effect of Inoculation and Type of Carrier Material Used on the Biofiltration of Methyl Sulphides’, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 45, 293–298.
Smet, E., Lens, P. and Van Langenhove, H.: 1998, ‘Treatment of Waste Gases Contaminated with Odorous Sulfur Compounds’, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Tech. 28, 89–117.
Smith, D. W. and Strohl, W. R.: 1991, ‘Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria’, in Shively, J.M. and Barton L.L. (eds.), Variations in Autotrophic Life, Academic Press. London, pp. 121–146.
Smith, N. A. and Kelly, D. P.: 1988, ‘Isolation and Physiological Chacterization of Autotrophic Sulphur Bacteria Oxidizing Dimethyl Disulphide as Sole Source of Energy’, J. Gen. Microbiol. 134, 1407–1417.
Van Groenestijn, J. W. and Hesselink, P. G. M.: 1993, ‘Biotechniques for Air Pollution Control’ Biodegrad. 4, 283–301.
Van Langenhove, H., Wuyts, E. and Schamp, N.: 1986, ‘Elimination of Hydrogen Sulphide from Odorous Air by a Wood Bark Biofilter’, Wat. Res. 20, 1471–1476.
Van Langenhove, H., Bendinger, B., Oberthür, R. and Schamp, N: 1992, ‘Organic Sulfur Compounds: Persistent Odourants in the Biological Treatment of Complex Waste Gases’, in Dragt, A. J. and Van Ham, J. (eds.) Biotechniques for air pollution abatement and odour control policies, Elsevier, Maastricht, pp. 177–182.
Williams, T. D. and Miller, F. C.: 1992a, ‘Odor Control Using Biofilters’, BioCycle 33, 72–77.
Williams, T. D. and Miller, F. C.: 1992b, ‘Biofilters and Facility Operations’, BioCycle 33, 75–79.
Winneke, G., Kotalik, J., Keldenich, H-O. and Kastka, J.: 1979, ‘Zur Wahrnehmung von Schwefelwasserstoff unter Labor-und Feldbedingungen’, Staub Reinhalt. Luft 39, 156–159.
Yang, Y. and Allen, E. R.: 1994, ‘Biofiltration Control of Hydrogen Sulfide 1. Design and Operational Parameters.’, J. Air Waste Manage. 44, 863–868.
Zhang, L., Hirai, M. and Shoda, M.: 1991, ‘Removal Characteristics of Dimethyl Sulfide, Methanethiol and Hydrogen Sulfide by Hyphomicrobium sp. 155 Isolated from Peat Biofilter’, J. Ferment. Bioeng. 72, 392–396.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hartikainen, T., Martikainen, P.J., Olkkonen, M. et al. Peat Biofilters in Long-Term Experiments for Removing Odorous Sulphur Compounds. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 133, 335–348 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012966705004
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012966705004