Skip to main content
Log in

Essay Review: When Evolution Became Conversation: Vestiges of Creation, Its Readers, and Its Respondents in Victorian Britain

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Behe, Michael J. 1996. Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1992. The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades Around 1900. Rev. ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 578 RYAN CAMERON MACPHERSON

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1988. The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, Roger. 1984. The Cultural Meaning of Popular Science: Phrenology and the Organization of Consent in Nineteenth-century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnton, Robert. 1990. “What Is the History of Books?” The Kiss of Lamourette: Reflections in Cultural History: 107–135. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembski, William A. 1999. Intelligent Design: The Bridge between Science & Theology. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembski, William A. (ed.). 1998. Mere Creation: Science, Faith & Intelligent Design. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, Adrian. 1997. Huxley: From Devil's Disciple to Evolution's High Priest. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1989. The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1982. Archetypes and Ancestors: Palaeontology in Victorian London 1850–1875. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1983. The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Kevin. 2001. “Whewell's Response to Darwinism as an Entreé into His Philosophy of Science: An Introductory Exploration.” Paper delivered at Mephistos 2001: Graduate Student Conference for the History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science, Technology, and Medicine, University of Notre Dame, 1 April.

  • Hilton, Boyd. 2000. “The Politics of Anatomy and an Anatomy of Politics c. 1825–1850.” Stefan Collini, Richard Whatmore and Brian Young (eds.), History, Religion, and Culture: British Intellectual History 1750–1950, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. J. S. 1972. “The Universal Gestation of Nature: Chambers' Vestiges and Explanations.” Journal of the History of Biology 5: 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N., Secord, J. A. and Spary, E. C. (eds.). 1996. Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, Adrian. 1998. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, John M. (ed.). 2000. Vestiges and the Debates before Darwin. 7 vols. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milhauser, Milton. 1959. Just Before Darwin: Robert Chambers and Vestiges. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numbers, Ronald L. 1998. Darwinism Comes to America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numbers, Ronald L. and Stenhouse, John. (eds.). 1999. Disseminating Darwinism: The Role of Place, Race, Religion, and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, Marilyn Bailey. 1973. “Robert Chambers and the Successive Revisions of the Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation.” Ph.D. diss., University of Oklahoma.

  • Pearcey, Nancy R. 1998. “You Guys Lost.” Dembski (ed.), pp. 73–92.

  • Ross, Hugh. 1998. “Big Bang Model Refined by Fire.” Dembski (ed.), pp. 363–384.

  • Rudwick, Martin J. S. 1985. The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke, Nicolaas A. 1983. The Great Chain of History: William Buckland and the English School of Geology (1814–1849). Oxford: Clarendon Press. ESSAY REVIEW 579

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, James A. 2000. Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, James A. (ed.). 1994. Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation and Other Evolutionary Writings. By Robert Chambers. Reprint of the 1st ed., 1844, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, James A. 1989. “Behind the Veil: Robert Chambers and Vestiges.” James R. Moore, (ed.), History, Humanity and Evolution: Essays for John C. Greene, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1986. Controversy in Victorian Geology: The Cambrian-Silurian Dispute. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Joel S. 1999. “Robert Chambers and Thomas Henry Huxley, Science Correspondents: The Popularization and Dissemination of Nineteenth Century Natural Science.” Journal of the History of Biology 32: 343–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven. 1994. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Phillip R. 2002 (forthcoming). “Whewell's Philosophy of Discovery and the Archetype of the Vertebrate Skeleton.” Annals of Science.

  • –– 1995. Review of Richard Owen: Victorian Naturalist, by Nicholaas A. Rupke. Metascience 7: 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern Literary Messenger. 1845. “Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation.” Southern Literary Messenger 11: 255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern Literary Messenger. 1846. “Explanations: A Sequel to ‘Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation,’ by the Author of That Work.” Southern Literary Messenger 12: 191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, George. 1847. “Theories of Creation and the Universe.” DeBow's Review 4: 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topham, Jonathan R. 1998. “Beyond the ‘Common Context’: The Production and Readings of the Bridgewater Treatises.” Isis 89: 233–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, Richard. 1984. “Science and Intellectual Authority in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Britain: Robert Chambers and Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation.” Victorian Studies 28: 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacPherson, R.C. Essay Review: When Evolution Became Conversation: Vestiges of Creation, Its Readers, and Its Respondents in Victorian Britain. Journal of the History of Biology 34, 565–579 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012951807944

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012951807944

Keywords

Navigation