Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosing Aging: I. Problem of Reliability of Linear Regression Models of Biological Age

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of the reliability of linear regression models of biological age assessment was studied using an experimental population of patients of a geroprophylactic center. The main factors of the model quality (interpopulation difference, method of approximation of biological age, and methods of approximation of statistical significance of parameters of biological age models) were tested. New equations were derived for calculating biological age. All parameters of these equations meet the requirements of significance. It was shown that if the nonlinear character of age dynamics of biological markers of aging and the statistical significance of model parameter estimates are taken into account, the model of biological age is substantially simplified and its reliability increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Biological Aging Measurement, Dean, W., Ed., Los Angeles, 1988.

  2. Belozerova, L.M., Ontogenetic Method of Determination of Human Biological Age, Usp. Gerontol., 1999, no. 3, p. 193.

  3. Voitenko, V.P., Tokar', A.V., and Polyukhov, A.M., Method of Determination of Human Biological Age, Gerontologiya i geriatriya. Biologicheskii vozrast, nasledstvennost’ i starenie (Gerontology and Geriatrics: Biological Age, Heredity, and Aging), Chebotarev, D.F., Ed., Kiev, 1984, p. 132.

  4. Krut'ko, V.N., Mamai, A.V., and Slavin, M.B., Classifi-cation, Analysis, and Application of Biological Age Indicators to Prognosis of Life Expectancy, Fiziol. Chel., 1995, no. 6, p. 42.

  5. Anstey, K.J., Lord, S.R., and Smith, G.A., Measuring Human Functional Age: A Review of Experimental Findings, Exp. Aging Res., 1966, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bulpitt, C.J., Assessing Biological Age: Practicality? (Review), Gerontology, 1995, vol. 41 no. 6, p. 315.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McClean, G.E., Biomarkers of Age and Aging (Review), Exp. Gerontol., 1997, vol. 32, nos. 1-2, p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mooradian, A.D., Biomarkers of Aging: Do We Know What to Look For?, J. Gerontol., 1990, vol. 45, no. 6, p. B183.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Practical Handbook of Human Biological Age Determination, Balin, A.K., Ed., Boca Raton: CRC, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turturro, A. and Hart, R.W., Biomarkers of Aging: An Overview, Biomed. Environ. Sci., 1991, vol. 4, nos. 1-2, p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aivazyan, S.A., Enyukov, I.S., and Meshalkin, L.D., Prikladnaya statistika. Issledovanie zavisimostei: spravochnoe izdanie (Handbook of Applied Statistics: Correlation Studies), Moscow: Finansy i Statistika, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krut'ko, V.N., Smirnova, T.M., Dontsov, V.I. et al. Diagnosing Aging: I. Problem of Reliability of Linear Regression Models of Biological Age. Human Physiology 27, 725–731 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012941413535

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012941413535

Keywords

Navigation