Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 331–345 | Cite as

Attracting Applicants in the War for Talent: Differences in Work Preferences Among High Achievers

  • Christine Quinn Trank
  • Sara L. Rynes
  • Robert D. BretzJr
Article

Abstract

This study examines how several indicators of ability and achievement are associated with individual differences in preferences for job and organizational attributes. Results from a sample of 378 business and liberal arts students suggest that students with high cognitive ability and all types of high achievement place greater importance on interesting and challenging work than do other students. However, on other work attributes (e.g., job flexibility, pay practices, fast-track promotion systems), students with high cognitive ability and high academic achievement (i.e., grade point average) appear to have different preference patterns from those with high social achievement (e.g., extracurricular and leadership activities). Results are discussed in terms of implications for employers and future research.

cognitive ability academic achievement social achievement job attributes recruitment job applicants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ashford, S.J. & Cummings, L.L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370–398.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J.S. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-seeking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, A.E. & Bretz, R.D. Jr. (2000). Compensation, attraction and retention. In S.L. Rynes & B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensation in Organizations, 32–61. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Bobko, P. (1990). Multivariate correlational analysis. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 1 (2nd edition), 1992, pp. 637–686. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  5. Borman, W.C., Hanson, M.A. & Hedge, J.W. (1997). Personnel Selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 299–337.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, B.K. & Campion, M.A. (1994). Biodata phenomenology: Recruiters' perceptions and use of biographical information in resume screening. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 897–908.Google Scholar
  7. Cable, D.M., & Judge, T.A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person-organizational fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317–348.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, Y. & Pfeffer, J. (1986). Organizational hiring standards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 1–24.Google Scholar
  10. Czikszentmihayli, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Davenport, T.O. (1999). Human capital. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Eccles, J. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.Google Scholar
  13. Fishman, C. (1998, October 17). The war for talent. Fast Company, 16, 104–106.Google Scholar
  14. Frank, R. H. & Cook, P. J. (1995). The winner-take-all society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Freiberg, K. & Freiberg, J. (1997). Nuts! Southwest Airlines' crazy recipe for business and personal success. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  16. Hamel, G. (2000, June 12). Reinvent your company. Fortune, 141(12), 98–118.Google Scholar
  17. Hough, L. (1984). Development and evaluation of the "accomplishment record" method of selecting and promoting professionals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 135–46.Google Scholar
  18. Hunter, J.E. & Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors across studies. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348–357.Google Scholar
  19. Jurgensen, C.E. (1978). Job preferences (What makes a job good or bad?) Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 267–276.Google Scholar
  20. Kanfer, R.M. & Heggestad, E.D. (1990). Motivational traits and skills: A person-centered approach to work motivation. In B. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 19), 1–56. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Labich, K. (1995, February 20). Kissing off corporate America. Fortune, 131(3), 44–52.Google Scholar
  23. Leavitt, H.J. (1996). The old days, hot groups and managers' lib. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 288–300.Google Scholar
  24. Leonard, D. (2000, May 29). Invasion of the body snatchers. Fortune, 141(11), 86–106.Google Scholar
  25. Louis, M. (1980). Surprise and sensemaking: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226–251.Google Scholar
  26. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P. & Ryan, J. (1995). Stability of vocational interests among the intellectually gifted from adolescence to adulthood: A 15-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 196–200.Google Scholar
  27. Mael, F.A. (1991). A conceptual rationale for domains and attributes of biodata items. Personnel Psychology, 44, 763–792.Google Scholar
  28. Mael, F.A. & Ashforth, B.E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 309–333.Google Scholar
  29. McClelland, D.C., Atkinson, J.W., Clark, R.A. & Lowell, E.L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  30. Mumford, M.D. & Stokes, G.S. (1992). Developmental determinants of individual action: Theory and practice in applying background measures. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 3 (2nd ed.), 61–138. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  31. Munk, N. (1998, March 16). The new organization man. Fortune, 137(5), 62–74.Google Scholar
  32. Offermann, L.R. & Gowing, M.K. (1990). Organizations of the future: Changes and challenges. American Psychologist, 45, 95–108.Google Scholar
  33. Oliphant, V.N. & Alexander, E.R. (1982). Reactions to resumes as a function of resume determinateness, applicant characteristics, and sex of raters. Personnel Psychology, 35, 829–842.Google Scholar
  34. Parsons, J.E. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  35. Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  36. Posner, B.Z. (1981). Comparing recruiter, student, and faculty perceptions of important applicant and job characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 34, 329–339.Google Scholar
  37. Powell, G.N. (1984). Effects of job attributes and recruiting practices on applicant decisions: A comparison. Personnel Psychology, 70, 706–719.Google Scholar
  38. Quinn, J.B. (1992). Intelligent enterprise. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ratan, S. (1993, October 4). Generational tension in the office: Why busters hate boomers. Fortune, 128 (8), 56–70.Google Scholar
  40. Roth, P.L. & Bobko, P. (2000). College grade point average as a personnel selection device: Ethnic group differences and potential adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 399–406.Google Scholar
  41. Rousseau, D.M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389–400.Google Scholar
  42. Rynes, S.L. (1991). Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research directions. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 2 (2nd ed.), 399–444. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists' Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rynes, S.L., & Barber, A.E. (1990). Applicant attraction strategies: An organizational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 15, 286–310.Google Scholar
  44. Rynes, S.L. & Connerley, M.L. (1993). Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1993, 7, 261–277.Google Scholar
  45. Sackett, P.R. & Roth, L. 1996. Multi-stage selection strategies: A Monte Carlo investigation of effects on performance and minority hiring. Personnel Psychology, 49, 549–572.Google Scholar
  46. Schein, E.H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  47. Schmidt, F.L. & Hunter, J.E. (1981). Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings. American Psychologist, 36, 1128–1137.Google Scholar
  48. Sellers, P. (1994, December 12). Don't call me slacker! Fortune, 130( ), 180–196.Google Scholar
  49. Sergent, M.T., & Sedlacek, W.E. (1990). Volunteer motivations across student organizations: A test of person-environment fit theory. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 255–261.Google Scholar
  50. Spence, J.T., & Helmreich, R.L. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives, 7–74. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  51. Stewart, T.A. 1997. Intellectual capital. New York: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar
  52. Stross, R.E. (1996, November 25). Microsoft's big advantage-hiring only the supersmart. Fortune, 134(10), 158–162.Google Scholar
  53. Stross, R.E. (1997, December 8). Mr. Gates builds his brain trust. Fortune, 136(11), 84–98.Google Scholar
  54. Taylor, M.S. & Collins, C. J. (2000). Organizational recruitment: Enhancing the intersection of research and practice. In C.L. Cooper & E.A. Locke (Eds.), Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Linking theory with practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Tatsuoka, M.M. (1988). Multivariate analysis: Techniques for educational and psychological research. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Turban, D.B. & Keon, T.L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 184–193.Google Scholar
  57. Wanous, J.P. (1973). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  58. Wonderlic Personnel Test Manual. (1983). Northfield, IL: E.F. Wonderlic & Assocs.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Quinn Trank
    • 1
  • Sara L. Rynes
    • 2
  • Robert D. BretzJr
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Management and OrganizationsThe University of IowaIowa City
  2. 2.The University of IowaUSA
  3. 3.University of Notre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations