Skip to main content
Log in

Urothelial cell transplantation using biodegradable synthetic scaffolds

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reconstruction of the urinary bladder with bowel to restore storage capacity is associated with significant complications arising from substituting an absorptive, mucus-producing intestinal epithelium for the barrier urothelium of the bladder. To overcome these problems, we are developing a “composite enterocystoplasty” procedure to replace the epithelium of the bowel with autologous in vitro-propagated normal urothelial cells. The aims of this study were to evaluate synthetic biomaterials as delivery vehicles for the cultured urothelial cells and provide support during transfer and cell adherence to the de-epithelialized bowel wall. The surgical compliance of 12 biomaterials was evaluated, along with their ability to support urothelial cell attachment. Transfer of urothelial cells onto biomaterials as single cell suspensions or intact cell sheets was investigated. Seeding of a single cell suspension on to non-woven mesh resulted in poor cell attachment. Seeding onto woven mesh was more efficient, but the most effective transfer method involved producing an intact cell sheet that could be combined with woven, knitted and non-woven biomaterials. Transfer of the cell sheet : mesh complexes onto a de-epithelialized bladder stroma produced a stratified epithelium incorporating the strands of the mesh and expressing urothelial-associated antigens after 48 h in organ culture. Thus, we have developed and evaluated a suitable transfer method for in vitro propagated urothelial cells to be used in “composite enterocystoplasty”.

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O. M. Lilien and M. Camey, J. Urol. 132 (1984) 886.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. J. Christmas, S. A. V. Holmes and W. F. Hendry, Br. J. Urol. 78 (1996) 69.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. A. Ghoneim and I. Shoukry, Int. Urol. Nephrol. 4 (1972) 25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. P. Stephenson and A. R. Mundy. Br. J. Urol. 57 (1985) 27.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. R Mundy, ibid. 69 (1992) 594.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Narayan, G. A. Broderick and E. A. Tanagho, ibid. 67 (1991) 588.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Gosalbez, Jr., J. R. Woodard, B. H. Broecker and B. Warshaw, J. Urol. 150 (1993) 710.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. E. Nurse and A. R. Mundy, British Journal of Urology 63 (1989) 165.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. L. Poulsen and K. Steven, ibid. 78 (1996) 47.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Gillon and A. R. Mundy, ibid. 63 (1989) 372.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. S. Palmer, I. Franco, S. J. Kogan, E. Reda, B. Gill and S. B. Levitt, J. Urol. 150 (1993) 726.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. J. Gleeson and D. P. Griffith, ibid. 148 (1992) 1377.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Probst, R. Dahiya, S. Carrie and E. A. Tanagho, Br. J. Urol. 79 (1997) 505.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. P. Kropp, B. L. Eppley, C. D. Prevel, M. K. Rippy, R. C. Harruff, S. F. Badylak, M. C. Adams, R. C. Rink and M. A. Keating, Urology 46 (1995) 396.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Oberpenning, J. Meng, J. J. Yoo and A. Atala, Nat. Biotechnol. 17, (1999) 149.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Atala, J. P. Vacanti, C. A. Peters, J. Mandell, A. B. Retik and M. R. Freeman, J. Urol. 148 (1992) 658.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Atala, M. R. Freeman, J. P. Vacanti, J. Shepard and A. B. Retik, ibid. 150 (1993) 608.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Frey, N. Lutz and A. L. Leuba, ibid. 156 (1996) 608.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Merguerian, D. R. Chavez and S. Hakim, ibid. 152 (1994) 671.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. A. R. Hutton, L. K. Tredosiewicz, D. F. M. Thomas and J. Southgate, ibid. 150 (1993) 721.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Southgate, K. A. Hutton, D. F. Thomas and J. K. Trejdosiewicz, Lab. Invest. 71 (1994) 583.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. D. Scriven, C. Booth, D. F. Thomas, L. K. Trejdosiewicz and J. Southgate, J. Urol. 158 (1997) 1147.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Southgate and L. K. Trejdosiewicz, Hum. Reprod. 65(12) (1997).

  24. A. Staack, T. Alexander, P. Merguerian and M. K. Terris, Eur. Urol. 39(4) (2001) 471.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Southgate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scriven, S.D., Trejdosiewicz, L.K., Thomas, D.F.M. et al. Urothelial cell transplantation using biodegradable synthetic scaffolds. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 12, 991–996 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012869318205

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012869318205

Keywords

Navigation