Skip to main content
Log in

Welfare-Improving Carbon Dioxide Tax Reform Taking Externality and Location into Account

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using Swedish household data from 1992, I analyze whether households disproportionately burdened by an increased carbon dioxide tax can be compensated by changes in other commodity taxes. This is done by searching for Dalton–improving tax reforms (DI-reforms), a method for welfare analysis which requires only ranking of households rather than cardinal comparisons. This application of the method has two features not found in earlier applications. First, the direct value of reduced carbon dioxide emissions is incorporated in the analysis. Second, the method is extended to allow identification of three-dimensional tax reforms, to be able to rank households along three dimensions. It is found that i) incorporating the value of reduced emissions does not unambiguously expand the set of DI-reforms, and ii) DI-reforms exist only when households are ranked in line with expenditures and size. When households' access to public transportation is also considered no DI-reforms are found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks, J., R. Blundell and A. Lewbel. (1996). “Tax Reform and Welfare Measurement: Do We Need Demand System Estimation?” Economic Journal 106, 1227–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., P. Pashardes and G. Weber. (1993). “What do We Learn About Consumer Demand Patterns from Micro Data?” American Economic Review 83, 570–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, H. (1920). “The Measurement of the Inequality of Income.” Economic Journal 30, 348–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (1972). “Distributional Equity and the Optimal Structure of Public Pricing.” American Economic Review 62, 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (1976). “On the Theory of Tax Reform.” Journal of Public Economics 6, 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, S. and P. Hedström. (1979). Jordbrukares och företagares inkomster och levnads-förhällanden, Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayeres, I. and S. Proost. (1998). “Marginal Tax Reform, Externalities and Income Distribution,” Center for Economic Studies Discussion Paper Series 98.32.

  • Myles, G. D. (1995). Public Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayshar, Y. and S. Yitzhaki. (1995). “Dalton-Improving Indirect Tax Reform.” American Economic Review 85, 793–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayshar, Y. and S. Yitzhaki. (1996). “Dalton-Improving Tax Reform: When Households Differ in Ability and Needs.” Journal of Public Economics 62, 399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1991). “To Slow or Not To Slow: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect.” The Economic Journal 101, 920–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salensmide, K. and F. Hammer. (1994). “Verdesettning av miljögoder ved bruk av samvalgs-analyse-Hovedundersökelse.” TÖI rapport 251/1994, Oslo: Transportökonomiskt Institutt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. (1975). “Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities.” Swedish Journal of Economics 77(1), 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner, T. (1994). “Environmental Tax Reform-The Swedish Experience.” European Environment 4, Part 6.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lundin, D. Welfare-Improving Carbon Dioxide Tax Reform Taking Externality and Location into Account. International Tax and Public Finance 8, 815–835 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012851528820

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012851528820

Navigation