Abstract
Using Swedish household data from 1992, I analyze whether households disproportionately burdened by an increased carbon dioxide tax can be compensated by changes in other commodity taxes. This is done by searching for Dalton–improving tax reforms (DI-reforms), a method for welfare analysis which requires only ranking of households rather than cardinal comparisons. This application of the method has two features not found in earlier applications. First, the direct value of reduced carbon dioxide emissions is incorporated in the analysis. Second, the method is extended to allow identification of three-dimensional tax reforms, to be able to rank households along three dimensions. It is found that i) incorporating the value of reduced emissions does not unambiguously expand the set of DI-reforms, and ii) DI-reforms exist only when households are ranked in line with expenditures and size. When households' access to public transportation is also considered no DI-reforms are found.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banks, J., R. Blundell and A. Lewbel. (1996). “Tax Reform and Welfare Measurement: Do We Need Demand System Estimation?” Economic Journal 106, 1227–1241.
Blundell, R., P. Pashardes and G. Weber. (1993). “What do We Learn About Consumer Demand Patterns from Micro Data?” American Economic Review 83, 570–597.
Dalton, H. (1920). “The Measurement of the Inequality of Income.” Economic Journal 30, 348–361.
Feldstein, M. (1972). “Distributional Equity and the Optimal Structure of Public Pricing.” American Economic Review 62, 32–36.
Feldstein, M. (1976). “On the Theory of Tax Reform.” Journal of Public Economics 6, 77–104.
Johansson, S. and P. Hedström. (1979). Jordbrukares och företagares inkomster och levnads-förhällanden, Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm.
Mayeres, I. and S. Proost. (1998). “Marginal Tax Reform, Externalities and Income Distribution,” Center for Economic Studies Discussion Paper Series 98.32.
Myles, G. D. (1995). Public Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayshar, Y. and S. Yitzhaki. (1995). “Dalton-Improving Indirect Tax Reform.” American Economic Review 85, 793–807.
Mayshar, Y. and S. Yitzhaki. (1996). “Dalton-Improving Tax Reform: When Households Differ in Ability and Needs.” Journal of Public Economics 62, 399–412.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1991). “To Slow or Not To Slow: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect.” The Economic Journal 101, 920–937.
Salensmide, K. and F. Hammer. (1994). “Verdesettning av miljögoder ved bruk av samvalgs-analyse-Hovedundersökelse.” TÖI rapport 251/1994, Oslo: Transportökonomiskt Institutt.
Sandmo, A. (1975). “Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities.” Swedish Journal of Economics 77(1), 86–98.
Sterner, T. (1994). “Environmental Tax Reform-The Swedish Experience.” European Environment 4, Part 6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lundin, D. Welfare-Improving Carbon Dioxide Tax Reform Taking Externality and Location into Account. International Tax and Public Finance 8, 815–835 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012851528820
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012851528820