Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Water Spray Protection of Machinery Spaces

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report provides an evaluation of the firefighting capabilities of fixed pressure water spray systems for machinery spaces as described in Regulation 10 of Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). The objective of this evaluation was to determine if a system meeting the minimum SOLAS requirement can provide adequate protection of shipboard machinery spaces. To meet this objective, the capabilities and limitations of twelve water spray systems were determined using the International Maritime Organization (IMO) test protocol for water mist systems (MSC 668 and 728) as the basis for this analysis. The tests were conducted in a simulated 500-m3 machinery space onboard the U.S. Coast Guard's test vessel STATE OF MAINE. Generally speaking, the trends in performance of water spray systems were similar to those observed for water mist systems. All systems were capable of extinguishing larger fires (4 kW/m3 and greater) with variations in system capabilities becoming apparent as the fire size was reduced (2 kW/m3 and below). Only about half of the systems were capable of extinguishing the 1.0 MW obstructed spray fire located on the side of the engine mock-up (similar to IMO-6). Water mist systems typically exhibit slightly better capabilities primarily against the smaller fires. It was concluded that the capabilities of these systems cannot be associated with a single parameter such as application rate and must be determined empirically. As a result, the approval of these systems needs to be performance based as with all other fire suppression systems required by SOLAS. It was recommended that SOLAS Regulation 10 be re-written to cover all water based machinery space systems with the caveat that they pass a modified IMO test protocol based on the one currently used for approving water mist systems [MSC 668 and 728].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.G. Back, C.L. Beyler, P.J. DiNenno, E.W. Forssell, M.J. Peatross, R. Hansen, D. Waller, and R. Zalosh, “An Evaluation of the International Maritime Organization's Gaseous Agents Test Protocol,” Report No. CG-D–24–97, U.S.Coast Guard, Groton, CT, October 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G.G. Back, E.W. Forssell, C.L. Beyler, P.J. DiNenno, R. Hansen, and D. Beene, “AnEvaluation of the International Maritime Organization's Gaseous Agents Test Protocol with Halocarbon Agents and an Inert Gas, 180 Degree Nozzles, and Low Temperature Conditioned Cylinders,” Report No. CG-D–02–99, U.S.Coast Guard, Groton, CT, December 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.G. Back, C.L. Beyler, P.J. DiNenno, and R. Hansen, “Full-Scale Water Mist Design Parameters Testing,” Report No. CG-D–03–99, U.S.Coast Guard, Groton, CT, February 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.G. Back, B.Y. Lattimer, C.L. Beyler, and H.R. DiNenno, “Full-Scale Testing of Water Mist Fire Suppression Systems for Small Machinery Spaces and Spaces with Combustible Boundaries,” Report No. CG-D–21–99, U.S.Coast Guard, Groton, CT, October 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.G. Back, C.L. Beyler, P.J. DiNenno, and R. Hansen,“Water Mist Protection Requirements for Verv Large Machinery Space,” Report No. CG-D–15–00, U.S.Coast Guard, Groton, CT, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. International Maritime Organization, “Guidelines forApproval of Equivalent Gas Fire-Extinguishing Systems, as Referred to in SOLAS 74, for Machinery Spaces and Cargo Pump-Rooms,” Annex to IMO Maritime Safety Committee Circular 848, June 8, 1998.

  7. 46 CFR, “Code of Federal Regulations,” Washington, DC, 1998.

  8. International MaritimeOrganization, “FTP Code, International Code for Application of Fire Test Procedures,” London, England, 1998.

  9. NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 1996 ed., Quincy,MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1996.

  10. NFPA 15, Water Spray Fixed Systems forFire Protection, 1996 ed., Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1996.

  11. G.G. Back, C.L. Beyler, and R. Hansen, “The Capabilities and Limitations of Total FloodingWater Mist Fire Suppression Systems in Machinery Space Applications,” Fire Technology, vol.36, February 2000, pp.8–23.

  12. G.G. Back, C.L. Beyler, P.J. DiNenno, and R. Hansen,“Water Spray Protection of Machinery Spaces,” Report No.CG-D–04–01, U.S.Coast Guard, Groton, CT, March 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Beyler, “Flammability Limits of Premixed and Diffusions Flames,”The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Section l/Chapter 7, Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.G. Back, C.L. Beyler, and R. Hansen, “A Ouasi-Steady-State Model for Predicting Fire Suppression in Spaces Protected by Water Mist Systems,” Fire Safety Journal, vol.35, November 2000, pp.327–362.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Coast Guard R&D Center, 1082 Shennecossett Road, Groton, CT, 06340

    Richard L. Hansen

  2. Hughes Associates Inc., 3610 Commercial Drive, Suite 817, Baltimore, MD, 21227-1652

    Gerard G. Back

Authors
  1. Richard L. Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerard G. Back
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, R.L., Back, G.G. Water Spray Protection of Machinery Spaces. Fire Technology 37, 317–326 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012720831429

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012720831429

Search

Navigation