Abstract
The production of antihydrogen is examined in the light of recent experimental results on a technique for the efficient accumulation, manipulation, and storage of positrons. From these data, we argue that this high-efficiency positron trapping technique could be adapted for the production of antihydrogen and would offer significant advantages over other positron trapping techniques currently being proposed for this purpose.
Keywords
Antihydrogen Gate Valve Positron Beam Antihydrogen Atom Positronium Atom
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]M. Charlton et al., Phys. Rep. 241 (1994) 65.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [2]M.H. Holzscheiter, Phys. Scr. T 5 (1995) 326.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [3]M.H. Holzscheiter et al., Phys. Lett. A 214 (1996) 279.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [4]G. Gabrielse et al., Hyp. Interact. 81 (1993) 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]C.M. Surko, M. Leventhal and A. Passner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 901.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [6]R.G. Greaves, M.D. Tinkle and C.M. Surko, Phys. Plasmas 1 (1994) 1439.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [7]L. Haarsma, K. Abdullah and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 806.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [8]T.W. Hansch and C. Zimmermann, Hyp. Interact. 76 (1993) 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]B.I. Deutch et al., Hyp. Interact. 76 (1993) 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]M.E. Glinsky and T.M. O’Neil, Phys. Fluids B 3 (1991) 1279.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [11]D.S. Hall and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1962; W. Quint, R. Kaiser, D. Hall and G. Gabrielse, Hyp. Interact. 76 (1993) 181.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [12]J. Walz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 3257.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [13]G. Baur et al., Phys. Lett. B 368 (1996) 251.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [14]G. Gabrielse et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 1317.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [15]C.M. Surko, A. Passner, M. Leventhal and F.J. Wysocki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 1831.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [16]D.J. Wineland, C.S. Weimer and J.J. Bollinger, Hyp Interact. 76 (1993) 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]B. Ghaffari, R.S. Conti and T.D. Steiger, AIP Conf. Proc. 303 (1994) 487.Google Scholar
- [18]T.E. Cowan et al., Hyp. Interact. 76 (1993) 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]A. Mohri et al., in: Elementary Processes in Dense Plasmas, eds. S. Ichimaru and S. Ogata (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1995) pp. 477–486.Google Scholar
- [20]H.G. Dehmelt, P.B. Schwinberg and R.S. Van Dyck, Jr., Int. J. Mass Spectr. Ion Phys. 26 (1978) 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]P.B. Schwinberg, R.S. Van Dyck, Jr., and H.G. Dehmelt, Phys. Lett. A 81 (1981) 119.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [22]T.J. Murphy and C.M. Surko, Phys. Rev. A 46 (1992) 5696.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [23]H. Dehmelt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62 (1990) 525.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [24]M. Charlton, Rep. Prog. Phys. 48 (1985) 737.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [25]D.M. Schrader and R.E. Svetic, Can. J. Phys. 60 (1982) 517.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [26]K. Iwata et al., Phys. Rev. A 51 (1995) 473.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [27]L. Bracci, G. Fiorentini and O. Pitzurra, Phys. Lett. B 85 (1979) 280.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [28]B.R. Beck, J. Fajans and J.H. Malmberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 317.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [29]M. Charlton, Can. J. Phys. 74 (1996) 483.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [30]M.R. Poulsen et al., J. Physics: Cond. Matter 3 (1991) 2849.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [31]J.P. Merrison, private communication, 1995.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997