Skip to main content
Log in

Co-operation and Unilateral Commitment in the Presence of Global Environmental Problems

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the link between group co-operation and unilateral commitment of some countries in the presence of global environmental problems. We show that in case of a failure of negotiation, some countries can decide to commit unilaterally and reduce their emissions. We call this behaviour precautionary commitment. Absence of international agreement does not mean global defection from the environmental issue.We also show that the emergence of a non-co-ordinatedglobal co-operation can result from a strategic actionfrom the members of the coalition. The insiders of the coalition create an incentive for the non-members to reduce without co-ordinating their emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Axelrod R. (1984), The Evolution of Co-operation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S. (1991), The Paradox of International Agreements, mimeo. London Business School.

  • Barrett S.(1992), ‘International Environmental Agreements as Games’, in R. Pethig, ed., Conflicts and Co-operation in Managing Environmental Resources. Springer-Verlag.

  • Barrett S. (1994), ‘Self Enforcing InternationalAgreements’, Oxford Economic Papers 46, 878–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S. (1997a), ‘HeterogeneousInternational Environmental Agreements’, in Carraro, ed., International Environmental Negotiations, Strategic Policy Issues. U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S. (1997b), ‘The Strategy of Trade Sanctions in InternationalEnvironmental Agreements’, Resource and Energy Economics 19, 345–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C. andD. Sinicalco (1992), ‘The International Dimension of Environmental Policy’, European Economic Review 36, 379–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C. and D. Sinicalco (1993), ‘Strategies for the International Protection of theEnvironment’, Journal of Public Economics 52, 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chander P. and H. Tulkens (1992),‘Theoretical Foundations of Negotiations and Costs Sharing in Transfrontier Pollution Problems’, European Economic Review 36, 388–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z. (1997), ‘Negotiating an Agreement on Global Warming: ATheoretical Analysis’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32, 170–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Aspremont C., A. Jacquemin, J. Gabszewics and J. Weymark (1983), ‘On the Stability of CollusivePrice Leadership’, Canadian Journal of Economics 16, 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donsimoni M., N. Economidesand H. Polemarchakis (1986), ‘Stable Cartels’, International Economic Review 27, 317–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folmer H., P. Mouche and S. Ragland (1993), ‘Interconnected Games and International EnvironmentalProblems’, Environmental and Resource Economics 3, 313–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güth W., W. Leininger and G. Stephan (1991), ‘On Supergames and Folk Theorems — a Conceptual Discussion’, in R. Selten, ed., Game Equilibrium Models, Volume II: Methods, Morals and Markets. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G.(1968), ‘The Tragedy of Commons’, Science 162, 1243–1248.

  • Hoel M. (1991), ‘GlobalEnvironmental Problems: The Effects of Unilateral Actions Taken by One Country’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20, 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala V., M. Pohjola and O. Tahvonen (1992a),‘Transboundary Air Pollution and Soil Acidi-fication: A Dynamic Analysis of an Acid Rain Game Between Finland and the USSR’, Environmental and Resource Economics 2, 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala V., M. Pohjola and O. Tahvonen (1992b), ‘An Economic Analysis of Transboundary Air Pollution Between Finland and the Former Soviet Union’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E. (1990), Governing theCommons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Péreau J-C. and T. Tazdaït (2000), Partial andGlobal Co-operation with Unilateral Commitment in the Presence of Global Environmental Problems. Nota di lavoro, September, FEEM.

  • Rotillon G. and T. Tazdaït (1996), ‘International Bargaining in the Presence ofGlobal Environmental Change’, Environmental and Resource Economics 8, 293–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotillon G.,T. Tazdaït and S. Zeghni (1996), ‘Bilateral or Multilateral Bargaining in the Face of Global Environmental Change’, Ecological Economics 18, 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snidal D. (1985), ‘Co-ordination versus Prisoners'Dilemma: Implications For International Cooperation and Regimes’, American Political Science Review 79, 923–942.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pereau, JC., Tazdait, T. Co-operation and Unilateral Commitment in the Presence of Global Environmental Problems. Environmental and Resource Economics 20, 225–239 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012638802001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012638802001

Navigation